Aces High Bulletin Board

General Forums => Wishlist => Topic started by: tuton25 on October 13, 2012, 09:25:42 PM

Title: My list of planes to be added
Post by: tuton25 on October 13, 2012, 09:25:42 PM
1) HE-111
2) JU-52
3) KI-100
4) B6N
5) J2M
6) Re.2005
7) KI-44
8) DO-217
9) JU-188
10) TU-2
11) Z.1007
12) P.108
13) HE-177
14) Mosquito Mk. IV
15) Mosquito Mk. XXX

Just my list of aircraft that would make good additions to the game
Title: Re: My list of planes to be added
Post by: Karnak on October 13, 2012, 11:47:19 PM
15) Mosquito Mk. XV
Why?

This was intended to intercept the Ju86 high altitude bombers. It was stripped down with a reduced fuel load.  The .303s in the nose were removed and the 20mm cannons in the belly were replaced with .303s.  Yes, a Mosquito fighter armed with four .303s.

If you want a high altitude Mosquito fighter, the Mk 30 is the one you want.
Title: Re: My list of planes to be added
Post by: tuton25 on October 13, 2012, 11:50:55 PM
sorry, listed the wrong plane, wikipedia lied again, (or my inability to read)
Title: Re: My list of planes to be added
Post by: guncrasher on October 14, 2012, 02:24:26 AM
sorry, listed the wrong plane, wikipedia lied again, (or my inability to read)

there's about another 100 planes that you forgot to add to that list.


semp
Title: Re: My list of planes to be added
Post by: MrKrabs on October 14, 2012, 03:17:28 AM
First mistake was mentioning Wikipedia...
Title: Re: My list of planes to be added
Post by: Karnak on October 14, 2012, 08:13:13 AM
First mistake was mentioning Wikipedia...
Not really.  Wikipedia is a fine starting point.  It gets dinged much more than is actually warranted.
Title: Re: My list of planes to be added
Post by: RngFndr on October 14, 2012, 09:28:39 AM
A26 Invader.. Uber LW light bomber FTW!
Title: Re: My list of planes to be added
Post by: Karnak on October 14, 2012, 09:45:10 AM
A26 Invader.. Uber LW light bomber FTW!
That would likely be the cheapest perk bomber.  Perked just enough to control its usage considering the high likelyhood of it failing to return to base.
Title: Re: My list of planes to be added
Post by: RngFndr on October 14, 2012, 09:55:00 AM
That would likely be the cheapest perk bomber.  Perked just enough to control its usage considering the high likelyhood of it failing to return to base.

Gotta be more survivable than an A20 in LW..
Without a doubt, it would be the primo light bomber in the game!
Title: Re: My list of planes to be added
Post by: Karnak on October 14, 2012, 01:00:05 PM
Gotta be more survivable than an A20 in LW..
Without a doubt, it would be the primo light bomber in the game!
Faster than the A-20G, but less maneuverable.  Heavy bomb load and more guns.

It would likely be perked.  Pyro said as much in a phone conversation years ago.
Title: Re: My list of planes to be added
Post by: tuton25 on October 14, 2012, 04:44:29 PM
We need another goon
Title: Re: My list of planes to be added
Post by: ink on October 14, 2012, 05:19:28 PM

5) J2M


Just my list of aircraft that would make good additions to the game


this is the one I would like to see :aok


and of course update the KI84 to the quad 20's :x
Title: Re: My list of planes to be added
Post by: SmokinLoon on October 15, 2012, 12:35:11 PM
While there are dozens of aircraft that could legitimately be added to AH for a number of reasons and purposes, the following are my opinions as to what is priority:

TOP Three Priority:
He111, Ki-43 "Oscar", Tu-2.

Secondary:
Beaufighter, D520, MiG3, Wellington

Tertiary:
Meteor Mk III, Pe-2, and re-model of AH1 Aircraft.   :)

Title: Re: My list of planes to be added
Post by: Slade on October 15, 2012, 12:56:49 PM
Quote
TOP Three Priority: He111, Ki-43 "Oscar", Tu-2.

+1
Title: Re: My list of planes to be added
Post by: Karnak on October 15, 2012, 02:04:53 PM
TOP Priority:
He111, Ki-43 Hayabusa 'Oscar', Tu-2, D4Y Susei 'Judy'.

Secondary:
Beaufighter, D520, MiG3, Wellington, Pe-2, J2M Raiden 'Jack', Ki-44-II Shoki 'Tojo', Ju188A-1, SM.79-II, B6N2 Tenzan 'Jill', remodel of AH1 units

Tertiary:
G.55, SB2C Helldiver, Seafire L.Mk III, Firefly Mk I, Bf109G-6/AS, Ki-102 'Randy', H8K2 'Emily', B7A2 Ryusei 'Grace', Ju52

Quadrary:
Meteor Mk III, He162A, F7F, F8F
Title: Re: My list of planes to be added
Post by: tuton25 on October 15, 2012, 07:53:13 PM
why can't I edit it again???
Title: Re: My list of planes to be added
Post by: SmokinLoon on October 16, 2012, 12:58:33 PM
why can't I edit it again???

Because your edit-fu is weak, young padawan.  Go now, and be at peace.   ;)
Title: Re: My list of planes to be added
Post by: Tank-Ace on October 17, 2012, 04:13:43 PM
Don't forget the IAR 80. Main romanian fighter up untill 1944. The IAR 80M would be about the equal of the spit 8 in terms of speed and firepower, IIRC.
Title: Re: My list of planes to be added
Post by: Ack-Ack on October 17, 2012, 05:19:54 PM
Don't forget the IAR 80. Main romanian fighter up untill 1944. The IAR 80M would be about the equal of the spit 8 in terms of speed and firepower, IIRC.

No it wouldn't have.  The proposed IAR 80M was nothing more than an upgunned versions of the IAR 80A/80B and IAR 81A/81B models.  It wouldn't even come close to the performance of a Spitfire VIII in terms of speed.  Also, the IAR 80 was such a minor player in the war that it's contributions is merely a footnote.

ack-ack
Title: Re: My list of planes to be added
Post by: Tank-Ace on October 17, 2012, 05:48:39 PM
And the D520's wasn't? It had potential, yes, but really did almost nothing.
Title: Re: My list of planes to be added
Post by: Ack-Ack on October 17, 2012, 06:08:53 PM
And the D520's wasn't? It had potential, yes, but really did almost nothing.

While the contributions to the overall war effort of the D.520 was minimul, it's service record with the French and Vichy French was better than the IAR 80/81's record on the Eastern Front and in the defense of Romania.

ack-ack
Title: Re: My list of planes to be added
Post by: Plawranc on October 18, 2012, 06:35:42 PM
HE-111
Title: Re: My list of planes to be added
Post by: Tank-Ace on October 18, 2012, 07:28:03 PM
While the contributions to the overall war effort of the D.520 was minimul, it's service record with the French and Vichy French was better than the IAR 80/81's record on the Eastern Front and in the defense of Romania.

ack-ack

Not saying the D.520 shouldn't be added, but only that if its high enough on the list to be a secondary addition, then the IAR is as well.

Personally, I feel the fact that it was Romania's primary fighter till June of '44 counts for more in the History section. After looking at the 80M, it looks like it would be decent in MW, depending on how HTC were to impement it.
Title: Re: My list of planes to be added
Post by: Ack-Ack on October 18, 2012, 07:51:01 PM
Not saying the D.520 shouldn't be added, but only that if its high enough on the list to be a secondary addition, then the IAR is as well.

Personally, I feel the fact that it was Romania's primary fighter till June of '44 counts for more in the History section. After looking at the 80M, it looks like it would be decent in MW, depending on how HTC were to impement it.

The only reason why the IAR 80 was the main fighter for the Romanians was it was the only fighter they had until they started to convert en masse to the Bf 109G-6.  During the "American Campaign" in four months of action, the Romanians lost more IAR 80s and pilots than they did in 2 years of combat against the Soviets.

As for the IAR 80M there are no numbers on how many IAR 80A/80B and IAR 81A/81Bs were converted to the IAR 80M, so if the IAR 80/81 was ever introduced into AH, it would probably be the IAR 80A/80B or the fighter bomber version IAR 81A/81B.

Though I am curious as to why you would ever think the IAR 80 was comparable to the far more superior Spitfire VIII. 

ack-ack
Title: Re: My list of planes to be added
Post by: Karnak on October 18, 2012, 08:18:16 PM
Looking at the numbers I have it seems that the IAR-80 and variants are roughly parable, depending on version, with the A6M2, Hurricane Mk I, Bf109E-4 and Spitfire Mk Ia.
Title: Re: My list of planes to be added
Post by: Motherland on October 18, 2012, 08:29:03 PM
TOP Priority:
He111, Ki-43 Hayabusa 'Oscar', Tu-2, D4Y Susei 'Judy'.

Secondary:
Beaufighter, D520, MiG3, Wellington, Pe-2, J2M Raiden 'Jack', Ki-44-II Shoki 'Tojo', Ju188A-1, SM.79-II, B6N2 Tenzan 'Jill', remodel of AH1 units

Tertiary:
G.55, SB2C Helldiver, Seafire L.Mk III, Firefly Mk I, Bf109G-6/AS, Ki-102 'Randy', H8K2 'Emily', B7A2 Ryusei 'Grace', Ju52

Quadrary:
Meteor Mk III, He162A, F7F, F8F
Out of all the RA fighters, the G.55? And only the G.55?
Title: Re: My list of planes to be added
Post by: Tank-Ace on October 18, 2012, 08:31:03 PM
The only reason why the IAR 80 was the main fighter for the Romanians was it was the only fighter they had until they started to convert en masse to the Bf 109G-6.  During the "American Campaign" in four months of action, the Romanians lost more IAR 80s and pilots than they did in 2 years of combat against the Soviets.

As for the IAR 80M there are no numbers on how many IAR 80A/80B and IAR 81A/81Bs were converted to the IAR 80M, so if the IAR 80/81 was ever introduced into AH, it would probably be the IAR 80A/80B or the fighter bomber version IAR 81A/81B.

Though I am curious as to why you would ever think the IAR 80 was comparable to the far more superior Spitfire VIII.

I don't know why, but I was remembering the 80 being up in the 330mph range at low alt. My mistake. But it would be reasonable in MW. I mean the biggest issue with the 109E is that its a bit light on ammunition, and the balistics are poorer. And the A6M is just about as good as its older brothers. And the IIC can do well in certian situations, and the biggest improvment was its firepower.

As for the 80M, IIRC, most 81C's had their bomb-rack stripped, and were sent off to fighter units. Since they are otherwise identicle, it would be pretty much impossible to differentiate 81C's from 80M's on a purely visual basis.

You'd have to identify the squadron, establish a time-frame, and track down what types were sent where and when.
Title: Re: My list of planes to be added
Post by: Karnak on October 18, 2012, 09:07:00 PM
Out of all the RA fighters, the G.55? And only the G.55?
I suppose I ought to have put the C.200 and CR.42 on there somewhere.

Honestly, add the C.200 to the existing C.202 and C.205 and you have reasonably complete Italian fighter coverage.
Title: Re: My list of planes to be added
Post by: Butcher on October 18, 2012, 09:07:19 PM
IAR 80 was an interesting bird I never got to research completely, but from what I do know - Its a typical early war bird. Lacks any heavy guns (6x light machine guns) range was limited, speed was decent at 330 at alt.
When you look at the D.520 - it was simply a state of the art design, 345mph at alt, with pair of hispano guns, fact is D.520 fought in 1940, while IAR 80a was end of 1941+.
D.520 had to fight the best the Germans had to offer the 109E, while the IAR 80a went against whatever flying junk the russians could put up (and pilot skill wise).

It might of been in service till 1944 for good reason, it had absolutely no competition in equal terms... Frankly even if the IAR 80c gets added, it was no way near in performance to any american plane flying over romania in 44, other then turn radius.

I only cast my vote on the D.520, because I have more solid information on it. Honestly I joke much about the french, but this bird was actually pretty wonderful even if it was a footnote just as the IAR 80 was.

Title: Re: My list of planes to be added
Post by: Butcher on October 18, 2012, 09:09:13 PM
I suppose I ought to have put the C.200 and CR.42 on there somewhere.

Honestly, add the C.200 to the existing C.202 and C.205 and you have reasonably complete Italian fighter coverage.

C.200 and G.55 would complete the list, people cast out the G.55 but it scored well over 100 victories against the allies. Think if it as an upgrade to the C205.

Title: Re: My list of planes to be added
Post by: Ack-Ack on October 18, 2012, 09:35:46 PM
while the IAR 80a went against whatever flying junk the russians could put up (and pilot skill wise).

Even with the low quality of Soviet pilots and equipment at the time, Romanian fighter units with the IAR 80 really didn't make that much of an impact compared to their German counter parts.


Quote
Frankly even if the IAR 80c gets added, it was no way near in performance to any american plane flying over romania in 44, other then turn radius.

That's why it was yanked from service in 1944, they were being slaughtered by US planes.

ack-ack
Title: Re: My list of planes to be added
Post by: Masherbrum on October 18, 2012, 11:42:03 PM
The IAR 81c would be the one to have the most fun with, in this game.   
Title: Re: My list of planes to be added
Post by: Sabre on October 19, 2012, 10:33:13 AM
While there are dozens of aircraft that could legitimately be added to AH for a number of reasons and purposes, the following are my opinions as to what is priority:

TOP Three Priority:
He111, Ki-43 "Oscar", Tu-2.

Secondary:
Beaufighter, D520, MiG3, Wellington

Tertiary:
Meteor Mk III, Pe-2, and re-model of AH1 Aircraft.   :)

 :aok Special place in my heart for the Oscar. I remember way back in the day  :old: (the Warbirds days, that is)...I took up a Ki-43 and tangled with an F6F and and F4U. The fight went on for 10 minutes; sent them both home with serious damage and landed with 3 rounds of ammo. Plus, it would make for some great early war scenarios (early AVG vs IJA). Also love to see the Meteor added, as a counter to the 262. Other A/C suggestions also fine.

Title: Re: My list of planes to be added
Post by: Ack-Ack on October 20, 2012, 04:11:15 AM
The IAR 81c would be the one to have the most fun with, in this game.   

Agreed, would be a good fit in the MW arena.

ack-ack