Aces High Bulletin Board
General Forums => Aircraft and Vehicles => Topic started by: sonic23 on April 17, 2013, 08:05:55 PM
-
So someone today named icepac told me the 163 could out turn a Ki-43 or brewster. Now im no 163 expert but from the amount of times Ive flown it id say it has a hard time trying to out maneuver a spit, seems to be more on a p51 or p47 level to me maybe a little better. Anyways he told me something along the lines that i should've been able to out turn his spit 8 easily (before he crashed into the tree) and that i didn't know how to handle a 163, so maybe i don't, but i just want to clarify does anyone know or have a chart on where the 163 compares to other planes turning radius.
-
My general rule of thumb if your aircrafts speed vastly exceeds that of your enemies you are doing something wrong to get slow regardless of turning performance.
-
My general rule of thumb if your aircrafts speed vastly exceeds that of your enemies you are doing something wrong to get slow regardless of turning performance.
ok, thats nice, but i have a limited amount of gas and i enjoy fighting other planes especially when its a 1v1 in the middle of nowhere.
-
If you want to have fun in a 163 get slow and just camp some poor target's six. You can just stay there as they flounder about until they auger, manuever themselves into a point where you just can't help yourself but tap the fire button, or give up and fly straight and level (had this happen twice). Doing this to most planes is no problem as long as the local environment is free of pickers. I'm not sure you could do it to a Ki43, A6M or Il6 but would be interesting to try.
-
If you want to have fun in a 163 get slow and just camp some poor target's six. You can just stay there as they flounder about until they auger, manuever themselves into a point where you just can't help yourself but tap the fire button, or give up and fly straight and level (had this happen twice). Doing this to most planes is no problem as long as the local environment is free of pickers. I'm not sure you could do it to a Ki43, A6M or Il6 but would be interesting to try.
I know what you mean I love dogfighting in the 163 lol and if i start to lose i just zoom. but my question when u are in a 163 low and slow with the flaps out just what do you think it can stick with, Id say maybe an la7 at best or a poorly flown spit.
-
icepac is a compulsive liar, I would advise you not to pay too much attention to anything he says :)
-
icepac is a compulsive liar, I would advise you not to pay too much attention to anything he says :)
ok i was told that and some other things about him lol. Apparently im a dweeb to everyone (as he says) because i told him if i ran out of fuel in my perked ride i would try to ditch it before i let him have the kill. He wouldnt stop PMing me about my dweebery.
-
:lol
-
Me 163 will not out turn a Ki-43 or a Zeke. Yes, it's highly maneuverable but icepac has to drop the crack pipe if he thinks it can.
ack-ack
-
Me 163 will not out turn a Ki-43 or a Zeke. Yes, it's highly maneuverable but icepac has to drop the crack pipe if he thinks it can.
ack-ack
I didnt think so, but if you say that to him you just dont know how to fly it, so if someone could teach me this uber way of turning it would be much appreciated lol
-
If both flew to their strength's, a battle between a Ki-43 and Me-163 would have no result.
-
If both flew to their strength's, a battle between a Ki-43 and Me-163 would have no result.
yes i understand this im not trying to debate how one should fly the 163 im just asking is their a chart or any data that can show me its maximum flat turning radius, and or what planes that compares too. Imho i would say it could turn with an la7 at best but ive never tested it lol.
-
If both flew to their strength's, a battle between a Ki-43 and Me-163 would have no result.
Wait, wouldn't a draw qualify as a result? (Then again, I don't know how to divide by zero either :D)
-
Easy way to sort this out. Get Icepac to up in a beloved Me-163, you in a Zero, find a quiet spot in the DA and set the rule of nothing over 200knts. Make him pay with perks then see who wins.
My money is he shuts up really quickly.
Boo
-
icepac can't go to the DA due to the lag
( :lol )
-
still no answer to OP's question. Just have to comment about how often I see that when someone can't answer your question they tell you are wrong for needing that information. :lol
Sorry Sonic, I don't have the turn rate data for either plane. :salute
-
I didnt think so, but if you say that to him you just dont know how to fly it, so if someone could teach me this uber way of turning it would be much appreciated lol
He's probably going to reply that at 30k it will.
ack-ack
-
icepac can't go to the DA due to the lag
( :lol )
Ahh did he gave you the same lag story :lol, and trust me this is a guy who flew five sectors in a spit with his main mission of finding 163's and leading them to the middle of nowhere to run out of fuel, then you have to let him get the kill on you or you're a dweeb if you ditch, there is no getting thru to this guy nor will he ever DA anyone.
-
still no answer to OP's question. Just have to comment about how often I see that when someone can't answer your question they tell you are wrong for needing that information. :lol
Sorry Sonic, I don't have the turn rate data for either plane. :salute
Idk if there is any official data would be nice to see but i would like to get some opinions on just what they think they can turn with in a 163, i have found i can hang with p-40s and p-51s quite easily but get out turned by most spits.
edit: and yes it is funny how people like to reply to questions with things that is completely unrelated to what i want to know :bhead, but that happens everywhere, i guess if people only responded with what i was looking for i would get 1 or 2 replies
-
The 163 and 262 are disabled in the DA. Can you imagine the DA with free 163's and 262's?
I doubt there's any charts Sonic. Not at dogfighting speeds anyway. How many charts have you seen for other aircraft at every possible reduced throttle setting?
I love to dogfight low and slow in the 163. It is a very nimble aircraft but not on par with the best turners in the game. It might be able to turn with many of the "jack of all trades" fighters though. Then again if you get in too deep just throttle up and climb and no one will be able to follow.
I once ran into 15-20 P-38's on a mission, got into a turnfight with them, killed three and got away. That was a lot of fun.
-
icepac can't go to the DA due to the lag
( :lol )
If lag preents one from going to the DA. What ground do they stand on in the MA?
-
I refer you to my first post in this thread
-
Sonic, is this a question about the performance of the ME-163 or are you just using the question to give us your opinion of Icepak while attempting to bypass a "Rule #4" deletion ?
-
Sonic, is this a question about the performance of the ME-163 or are you just using the question to give us your opinion of Icepak while attempting to bypass a "Rule #4" deletion ?
:uhoh :bolt:
-
That's exactly what he is doing.
Yes, I am on a cell phone connection and DA is out of the question because I will see the maneuvers of the enemy plane a full half second after it was performed......minimum (likely more) since my average ping is 445ms.
I'm not cool with the "compulsive liar" accusations of both coombz and dolby because it's just not true and the thread starter's ruse to slip one past skuzzy which I believe violates the terms of service here on the forums.......which is why some suffer bannings and I have not.
-
... and the thread starter's ruse ... because it's just not true ...
So you're saying you never said those things? Sonic... got film?
-
Sorry baldeagl....you caught me between edits.
It reads properly now.
-
So you're saying you never said those things? Sonic... got film?
I did take screenshots of ice saying the 163 can out-turn a brew or KI43, but im pretty sure hes sticking to that even though we all know its not true.
-
Sorry baldeagl....you caught me between edits.
It reads properly now.
so do you have film of out turning an Oscar in a 163? :devil
-
That's quite a leap you are making in putting words into my mouth, coombz.
Not sure what your agenda is but it surely violates the rules here.
-
That's quite a leap you are making in putting words into my mouth, coombz.
Not sure what your agenda is but it surely violates the rules here.
I'm not trying to put words into your mouth :angel:
Correct me if I'm wrong - your original post (as quoted by BaldEagl) seemed to indicate sonic23 was lying in his original post
You then edited the post, and said that it reads properly now. It no longer indiciates that sonic23 was lying
Therefore, we can assume that you did say to him that he was a dweeb for being unable to out turn you in his 163, and you also claimed that the 163 is capable of out turning a Brewster or an Oscar
I was just asking if you had a film to back this up (and I'm even able to do it with almost a straight face!) . The only agenda I have is the truth Sir :salute
-
I mistyped the order of the statements and fixed it.
I never implied the original poster lied because he didn't but I did imply he was trying to get around a "rule violation".
Your assumptions are part of some agenda that is counter the the rules here.
-
(http://oi45.tinypic.com/2czqkk.jpg)
My post was not intended to be a crack at you icepak, Others did that for me, i just wanted to ask around like you told me too about the 163.
-
(http://oi45.tinypic.com/2czqkk.jpg)
My post was not intended to be a crack at you icepak, Others did that for me, i just wanted to ask around like you told me too about the 163.
:rofl
-
Sonic,
once i had a fight, a finn guy (possibly MakeT, im not sure) in a 109G2 vs me in a 163. He could outturn me, so i had to hit full throttle and extend a bit vertically, and reset the fight. It happened a couple times, and took him 3-4 scissors to burn my advantage and get behind me. He was a very decent stick, not a newb. Later he got help and i had to run. Had ~60% fuel st the beginning and ~30-35 at the end.
Before some of ya start to throw rocks on me, saying how can i be that much of a newb, i could just BnZ him... he was flying well, deserved more than a brainless BnZ, also i wanted to see how the 163 can turn.
-
So someone today named icepac told me the 163 could out turn a Ki-43 or brewster. Now im no 163 expert but from the amount of times Ive flown it id say it has a hard time trying to out maneuver a spit, seems to be more on a p51 or p47 level to me maybe a little better. Anyways he told me something along the lines that i should've been able to out turn his spit 8 easily (before he crashed into the tree) and that i didn't know how to handle a 163, so maybe i don't, but i just want to clarify does anyone know or have a chart on where the 163 compares to other planes turning radius.
In r/l.....prolly not.....in the cartoon world of AH anything and everything is possible...the one that gets me is the A20 turn fighting with fighters, has no E then goes from 7k to 11k straight up......oh the MAGIC world of AH :bhead
-
.the one that gets me is the A20 turn fighting with fighters, has no E then goes from 7k to 11k straight up......oh the MAGIC world of AH :bhead
I'd like to see a film of that.
-
This thread is the best :rock
-
(http://oi45.tinypic.com/2czqkk.jpg)
My post was not intended to be a crack at you icepak, Others did that for me, i just wanted to ask around like you told me too about the 163.
It absolutely was intended as a crack at me because you mentioned me by name......which wasn't necessary as the wonder twins (one from uk and the other from nz) exist purely for that purpose.
He asked why I was out over his strats in a spitfire and I told him it was to fight ME163s and lure them out past safe return...........without leaving the boundaries of the arena.
Everything was cool until his answer in which he states he will ditch to deny a kill.
I'm not really cool with posting screenshots of text exhanges in the arena but, since skuzzy moved the topic without editing out sonic's screenshot, I will assume it is not in violation and will provide one of my own which explains why the conversation turned.
The "why aces high is starting to ***" comment is not a jab at HTC but rather implying that the players are to blame.
(http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8109/8660826906_519721c0d5_b.jpg)
-
This thread is the best :rock
Now it is even better :rock :rock
-
He asked why I was out over his strats in a spitfire and I told him it was to fight ME163s and lure them out past safe return...........without leaving the boundaries of the arena.
There's nothing wrong in what you are doing, ie. "baiting" Komets to fly them selves out of fuel like that. Nothing wrong with that at all and it is well within the boundaries of the game. Just like it is completely ok to try to ditch when out of fuel. Why should the other guy just hand the kill over to you on a silver platter? Because you flew a long way to "bait" him? Or is there some other reason for it?
The fact that you start mouting off at someone because he ditched after he's ran out fuel, while you were doing what you described here, is beyond moronic.
-
He didn't ditch but he stated he would do that specifically to deny a kill.
The obvious solution is to not up the 163 if you aren't willing to deal with what might be up there waiting.
-
He didn't ditch but he stated he would do that specifically to deny a kill.
The obvious solution is to not up the 163 if you aren't willing to deal with what might be up there waiting.
Add me to that list, please. :aok :aok
Want my scalp? You had better work for it.
-
There's nothing wrong in what you are doing, ie. "baiting" Komets to fly them selves out of fuel like that. Nothing wrong with that at all and it is well within the boundaries of the game. Just like it is completely ok to try to ditch when out of fuel. Why should the other guy just hand the kill over to you on a silver platter? Because you flew a long way to "bait" him? Or is there some other reason for it?
The fact that you start mouting off at someone because he ditched after he's ran out fuel, while you were doing what you described here, is beyond moronic.
I concur there is noting wrong about either, i did tell him in game, that baiting comets was dweebish only after he told me trying to ditch made me a dweeb. I did not see anything wrong with trying to ditch an out of fuel perk plane that was baited there, but according to ice thats the reason this game is starting to suck. Thank you ice for posting the screenshot for me, to verify once again what you said.
Anyways long story short he hit a tree and augured in his spit. I made it back home with fuel to spare, i think he was just salty he crashed or maybe that i wasnt as easily killed as most pilots.
-
Nope......everything was cool until your statement about ditching to deny a kill.
You landed zero hits on a pretty long engagement.
Don't put yourself into a situation in which that dweeb action would be the only way to "salvage the mission" and you won't have to deal with criticism.
You clearly stated your intent as seen in the screenshots.
-
Nope......everything was cool until your statement about ditching to deny a kill.
You landed zero hits on a pretty long engagement.
Don't put yourself into a situation in which that dweeb action would be the only way to "salvage the mission" and you won't have to deal with criticism.
You clearly stated your intent as seen in the screenshots.
I agree, but why are you so mad about something that never even happened i mean if its that tree ill go cut it down for you.
-
My wiener is bigger than your's. :rock
-
I agree, but why are you so mad about something that never even happened i mean if its that tree ill go cut it down for you.
:rofl
ack-ack
-
tries to get kills by running opponent out of fuel instead of shooting them
calls someone else pathetic and a dweeb
:headscratch:
-
I agree, but why are you so mad about something that never even happened i mean if its that tree ill go cut it down for you.
You're the one who felt the need to air the grievance on the forums.
I was cool letting it lie until you posted a thread.
And coombz.......shouldn't you be celebrating at parliament today?
-
And coombz.......shouldn't you be celebrating at parliament today?
(http://i.qkme.me/3pbbd8.jpg)
-
:rofl
-
HajajaJAHAHajaj
-
Here's how I see it:
There was no need for icepac to call Sonic a dweeb, no need for a PM exchange and no need for Sonic to start this thread to rub it in icepac's face.
It looks to me like there's plenty of dweebery to go around. It' s game. Whatever happens get over it and play some more or log off.
Now ArchieD on the other hand deserves ridicule.
-
Here's how I see it:
There was no need for icepac to call Sonic a dweeb, no need for a PM exchange and no need for Sonic to start this thread to rub it in icepac's face.
It looks to me like there's plenty of dweebery to go around. It' s game. Whatever happens get over it and play some more or log off.
Now ArchieD on the other hand deserves ridicule.
I still would like to know where the 163 stands as a turn fighter though, i think its safe to say icepac has retracted his statement about the 163, saying he had a hard time turning with a 109g2 which is far from the greatest turner in the game.
-
i think its safe to say icepac has retracted his statement about the 163, saying he had a hard time turning with a 109g2 which is far from the greatest turner in the game.
Icepac did not say that, and i think im not icepac. As far as i know.
I posted that to answer your opening question and to clarify that icepac's statement was a nonsense.
-
Icepac did not say that, and i think im not icepac. As far as i know.
I posted that to answer your opening question and to clarify that icepac's statement was a nonsense.
My bad debrody, For some reason i thought it was icepac who said that lol. At first i was like what is debrody talking about hah but Thank You for clearing that up :salute
-
I still would like to know where the 163 stands as a turn fighter though,
I haven't done any testing but experience tells me that Brewster/Ki-43 will have a smaller turn radius in situations what most people here would consider "normal". Altitude is one thing that obviously matters. If we held a turning contest between Komet and a Brewster at Brewster's practical ceiling (or higher :D) where it can barely turn if it tries to maintain constant altitude, Komet would obviously win.
One general note on the Komet...
The changes in the amount of fuel on board at the moment and during the turn made affects Komet more than any other fighter in the game. It carries massive ~4450lbs (!!) of fuel which is ~50% of its take off weight. For comparison, Brewster carries 960lbs of fuel which is "only" 17% (and that is actually quite a bit compared to many other fighters) of its take off weight.
-
I stand by my dweeb comment because of his stating he would simply ditch to deny a kill to the person who earned it by fighting him.
I saluted him after his victory and he PM'd me asking why I was there.........which should have been obvious since I attacked him.
I told him that dragging a 163 from safe landing is part of any 163 hunt and that's when he made the "ditch to deny kill" statement.
Sonic23 had the option of not posting a thread naming me but he chose otherwise and all here commenting should remember that fact.
Coombz and Dolby are simply haters who travel in tandem to wherever I post on these forums to stir things up.
In this case it was a spit VIII that had 50 minutes fuel remaining at 35,000 feet when the fight started.
I kept the fight fast knowing that blacking out would be the limiting factor in a turn fight which equals things out a bit until you run out off altitude in the lesser powered plane.
Not sure what fuel remaining was at lower altitudes because I was kind of busy fighting a 163.
Try the 163 with lots of flaps, full elevator trim (letter k held until trim full up), low fuel, and high power settings to drag you around and you will find it can fly an amazingly small turn circle.
I am unaware of the changes to the 163 and when they occurred so some clarification would help this discussion on 163 flight modeling.
I'm really surprised so many here don't know this or have never explored the flight model of the 163 as I have.
I've flown the 163 to 97,000 feet, 900mph, and flown 10 sectors in one ending in a safe landing so there is a lot more to this plane than most understand.
Try it out as described above and report back your findings instead of yelling "foul" without having done the research to properly arrive at that conclusion.
I don't expect the guys who fly LA7s around never getting above 10k feet to understand the amount of fun that can be had from these encounters.
(http://farm6.staticflickr.com/5234/5889088390_c528ae8a24_b.jpg)
-
I still would like to know where the 163 stands as a turn fighter though, i think its safe to say icepac has retracted his statement about the 163, saying he had a hard time turning with a 109g2 which is far from the greatest turner in the game.
the G2 turns rather well actually. :old:
it's not a spit but she can stay with alot of planes
-
You are a liar icepac because you pmd me first, i did say on channel 200 i was surprised to see a spit there though.
IDC how much fuel the 163 has left it cannot out turn a spit 8 on or near the deck.
I stand by my statement that you are a bigger dweeb for baiting comets, i mean who else does that everyone tries to ditch when they are unable to land especially in a perked plane.
and No one agrees with you Icepunk
-
Baiting a 163 to come up is not dweebery but ditching to deny a kill and your authoring this thread to assail me is.
Would you call Robin Olds a dweeb for baiting migs to come up after what they thought were F105s only to find F4s waiting to kill them?
Baiting planes to come is a legit tactic used many times in real life.
-
(http://i725.photobucket.com/albums/ww259/trobertson5-0/baitingenemy.jpg)
-
(http://www.nationalww2museumimages.org/web-assets/images/Gross-Live-Bait.jpg)
-
You are a liar icepac because you pmd me first, i did say on channel 200 i was surprised to see a spit there though.
IDC how much fuel the 163 has left it cannot out turn a spit 8 on or near the deck.
I stand by my statement that you are a bigger dweeb for baiting comets, i mean who else does that everyone tries to ditch when they are unable to land especially in a perked plane.
and No one agrees with you Icepunk
Strange....I never denied PM'ing you and really don't remember who PM'ed first nor do I care.
No lies here so you should probably hang out with coombz and dolby in the axe grinder's community and work on your abilities to spin an argument into your favor after the fact rather than entering into one woefully unarmed and having to resort to spin control.
Remember again, you had a choice of not engaging and you also had a choice of not posting a thread assailing my name.
It sounds like you are lacking in the knowledge of the history of baiting in a military engagement context as well as lacking in knowledge of the plane you chose to fly.
I'm not sure we were turning at the speeds where the spit turns best which is why you mentioned blacking out.
Your soreness leads me to believe you might not have made a safe landing at that V field as you claimed.....which would make you the liar if you did not do what you claimed you had done.
How about you provide a screenshot or film of the landing to provide proof to back up your claim?
You obviously have the film from which you posted screenshots so please stop with the childish name calling and show us something.
Do the test yourself of the 163 and maybe I will choose to do one as well and we can compare results.
-
God you make yourself look stupid icepac lol. O yeah and your whole baiting plan backfired, must suck to fly all the way over there and get killed by me. I dont care if you say you have a 75% success rate do you have any proof to back that up???
You have a 0% success rate against sonic :lol i hope you fly over the capital again when im on so i can get another free kill. :x
-
oh dear sonic
you have just invited yourself into the 'i receive angry forum PMs threatening me from icepac' club
hope you enjoy your stay :aok
-
Dear icepac:
(http://i.qkme.me/3qwink.jpg)
Never go full retard.
-
Dear icepac:
(http://i.qkme.me/3qwink.jpg)
Never go full retard.
:rofl
-
Dear icepac:
(http://i.qkme.me/3qwink.jpg)
Never go full retard.
:rofl :lol :rofl
-
Try the 163 with lots of flaps, full elevator trim (letter k held until trim full up), low fuel, and high power settings to drag you around and you will find it can fly an amazingly small turn circle.
I'm really surprised so many here don't know this or have never explored the flight model of the 163 as I have.
I've flown the 163 to 97,000 feet, 900mph, and flown 10 sectors in one ending in a safe landing so there is a lot more to this plane than most understand.
Try it out as described above and report back your findings instead of yelling "foul" without having done the research to properly arrive at that conclusion.
(http://farm6.staticflickr.com/5234/5889088390_c528ae8a24_b.jpg)
Trimming does nothing to help you turn better. It's been proved over and over on these boards. It's an AH myth and you clearly don't understand what trim tabs actually do.
Also increasing power is exactly the opposite of what you want to do if you want to turn a tighter circle.
I've also flown a 163 to over 97K. I've flown two sectors out, gotten into an extended fight and flown home. I've chased a 262 several sectors wide open on the deck after a two sector flight to find him then, heaven forbid, ditched to deny the runtard the kill when I ran out of fuel. In fact I bet I know more about the 163's performance envelope than you do. Care to meet in the TA to find out? 163 vs 163. If you've explored it's flight model to such a great extent it should be a lot of fun.
My point is don't think you're the great god of AH exploration or flight testing. Many of us have done far more than you can even begin to comprehend.
... but the 163 thing in the TA would be fun. Are they enabled there?
-
Never go full icepac.
-
You need to increase power to overcome the flaps required to fly at speeds low enough so as not to induce blackout during a small radius turn.
You aren't part of this......either is dolby or coombz yet here you are getting all hot and bothered.
oh dear sonic
you have just invited yourself into the 'i receive angry forum PMs threatening me from icepac' club
hope you enjoy your stay :aok
And Coombz........there were no PM's sent to sonic23 in the forums so your comment does not count like most of what you post here.
The truth doesn't support your agenda of hate.
IT's also very possible (not completely, though) that sonic23 sent the first PM after I saluted him saying "what were you doing all the way out here".
-
I like the 163 just as much as I like icepac making a fool of himself.
This thread has cheered me up immensely.
:aok
Here are just 3 tours of love
http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/newscores/killsin.php?playername=Dolby&kcnt=39&selectTour=LWTour159&pindex=74
http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/newscores/killsin.php?playername=Dolby&kcnt=38&selectTour=LWTour157&pindex=74
http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/newscores/killsin.php?playername=Dolby&kcnt=38&selectTour=LWTour154&pindex=74
-
HERe's some cake dolbs. Icepac you can have some too :D
-
I like the 163 just as much as I like icepac making a fool of himself.
This thread has cheered me up immensely.
:aok
Here are just 3 tours of love
http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/newscores/killsin.php?playername=Dolby&kcnt=39&selectTour=LWTour159&pindex=74
http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/newscores/killsin.php?playername=Dolby&kcnt=38&selectTour=LWTour157&pindex=74
http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/newscores/killsin.php?playername=Dolby&kcnt=38&selectTour=LWTour154&pindex=74
You even strafed a chute, you monster! :lol
-
Any clown can get kills in the 163.
(http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8265/8667658918_0f229466b8_z.jpg)
-
Six pages and going strong for over a week. :aok
(http://i239.photobucket.com/albums/ff107/tymekeepyr/LegendaryThread_zps833c01d1.jpg)[/URL]
-
:lol
-
:rofl
-
Any clown can get kills in the 163.
(http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8265/8667658918_0f229466b8_z.jpg)
(https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQGFxq58Z0SmCJ2FZX-nSRlzeI1uRGEEKz8R_5gdrrXAjMJ_T3eTQ)
(http://comstat.memecdn.com/images/comment/1294_tc.jpg)
-
(https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQGFxq58Z0SmCJ2FZX-nSRlzeI1uRGEEKz8R_5gdrrXAjMJ_T3eTQ)
(http://comstat.memecdn.com/images/comment/1294_tc.jpg)
do you just surf the Internet looking for these awesome memes and stuff? :headscratch:
-
Six pages and going strong for over a week. :aok
(http://i239.photobucket.com/albums/ff107/tymekeepyr/LegendaryThread_zps833c01d1.jpg)[/URL]
Actually it was kinda dead you brought it back probably looking for more LOLZ :lol, but I think my work here is done and i must depart now :airplane:
-
do you just surf the Internet looking for these awesome memes and stuff? :headscratch:
(https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTlXMW89Lhjsqg76v6WngjUYd6_t0JzTyukjQYWrl4m2d2bykXptw)
-
:rofl
-
(http://i.imgur.com/1lqkz.jpg)
-
(http://i.imgur.com/1lqkz.jpg)
bahahahaha
:rofl
-
Wow.
:rofl