Aces High Bulletin Board

General Forums => Wishlist => Topic started by: catdaddy on April 26, 2014, 08:38:40 PM

Title: C47's
Post by: catdaddy on April 26, 2014, 08:38:40 PM
Dc-3's (C-47's) had a unique design feature that made it possible to actually land the acft wheels up and not do any damage at all. The wheels protruded enough from the engine nacelles to accommodate an engine off landing, after touchdown the acft could be jacked up, drop the gear again, be repaired and takeoff. can we at least land them without the grinding crunching screeching to a halt belly-up landing noises?
Title: Re: C47's
Post by: APDrone on April 26, 2014, 09:50:00 PM
Ok.. that sent me surfing around looking for any proof..

Looking at the pics, I have a hard time believing this.. UNLESS it was based on the DC-3 originally having a 2 bladed prop and it could be feathered in position that would be parallel to the wing.

ALSO.. just because the wheel is exposed and would be between the aircraft and the ground, does not mean that there was enough load bearing capacity on the gear in the retracted position to prevent the wheel from getting shoved up through the nacelle. 

But, an interesting conjecture, certainly.

Got the documentation for that?
Title: Re: C47's
Post by: Chalenge on April 26, 2014, 10:13:49 PM
Completely untrue. The wheels in the retracted position do not have proper rigidity and would not support the weight.
Title: Re: C47's
Post by: RotBaron on April 27, 2014, 01:57:14 AM
idk anything about them other than they are pretty cool inside, went in the one (DC-3) at Falcon Field, Mesa AZ.

And just saw this one:

(http://www.bdoutdoors.com/forums/data/photos/m/177/177184-1398581734-4605c69322cd4faf607efff6be44c597.jpg)


(http://www.bdoutdoors.com/forums/data/photos/m/177/177185-1398581782-cff58d9a665775cfa0923289db235e2d.jpg)
Title: Re: C47's
Post by: Chalenge on April 27, 2014, 02:20:27 AM
The debris from the engines coming apart might also cause injury to your troops.

http://www.oldwings.nl/content/c47_yic/merlin_2.htm

or the prop might cause injury to the pilot:

http://www.oldwings.nl/content/c47_yic/c47rep1.htm
Title: Re: C47's
Post by: danny76 on April 28, 2014, 04:04:32 AM
The debris from the engines coming apart might also cause injury to your troops.

http://www.oldwings.nl/content/c47_yic/merlin_2.htm

or the prop might cause injury to the pilot:

http://www.oldwings.nl/content/c47_yic/c47rep1.htm

good pics :aok
Title: Re: C47's
Post by: mbailey on April 28, 2014, 06:31:35 AM
idk anything about them other than they are pretty cool inside, went in the one (DC-3) at Falcon Field, Mesa AZ.

And just saw this one:

(http://www.bdoutdoors.com/forums/data/photos/m/177/177184-1398581734-4605c69322cd4faf607efff6be44c597.jpg)


(http://www.bdoutdoors.com/forums/data/photos/m/177/177185-1398581782-cff58d9a665775cfa0923289db235e2d.jpg)

Nice bird  :aok
Title: Re: C47's
Post by: catdaddy on April 28, 2014, 05:04:13 PM
better read a little more than just wiki
Title: Re: C47's
Post by: Chalenge on April 28, 2014, 05:08:52 PM
Yes, I thought this one was very telling about belly landings:

http://www.oldwings.nl/content/c47_yic/c47b2006.htm
Title: Re: C47's
Post by: earl1937 on April 29, 2014, 07:42:14 PM
better read a little more than just wiki
:airplane: Guys, the only reason the  "spad" has protruding landing gear is so snow ski's can be attached and retracked during flight. I had about 250 hours in Douglas N13300 and we had "snow" shoes on it twice. Was a blast landing up hill, keeping speed up, reverese direction, then stop and let  the "nuts' out who wanted to ski down the mountain! Takeoffs were fun, just head it down hill, about 3/4 throttle, 5 degrees nose up trim, keep it straight with your feet, first thing you know, you have made a perfect takeoff and you didn't have to touch a thing except rudder pedals.
Title: Re: C47's
Post by: mbailey on April 30, 2014, 05:54:30 AM
:airplane: Guys, the only reason the  "spad" has protruding landing gear is so snow ski's can be attached and retracked during flight. I had about 250 hours in Douglas N13300 and we had "snow" shoes on it twice. Was a blast landing up hill, keeping speed up, reverese direction, then stop and let  the "nuts' out who wanted to ski down the mountain! Takeoffs were fun, just head it down hill, about 3/4 throttle, 5 degrees nose up trim, keep it straight with your feet, first thing you know, you have made a perfect takeoff and you didn't have to touch a thing except rudder pedals.

Dont know if that sounds like fun, or if its nuts  :lol
Title: Re: C47's
Post by: earl1937 on May 01, 2014, 01:26:16 PM
Dont know if that sounds like fun, or if its nuts  :lol
:airplane: A little of both, was still partly in stupid stage, (less than 30 and bullet proof), but with out a little of stupid in people, look how much would not have been discovered!!
Title: Re: C47's
Post by: colmbo on May 01, 2014, 07:54:27 PM
Those down hill takeoffs can be odd in that after "lifting off" you might still be descending.
Title: Re: C47's
Post by: Traveler on May 02, 2014, 09:53:32 AM
Dc-3's (C-47's) had a unique design feature that made it possible to actually land the acft wheels up and not do any damage at all. The wheels protruded enough from the engine nacelles to accommodate an engine off landing, after touchdown the acft could be jacked up, drop the gear again, be repaired and takeoff. can we at least land them without the grinding crunching screeching to a halt belly-up landing noises?

Where did you get this information from?  As far as I know it is not correct.  I have several thousand hours in DC3's used for passenger service by Monmouth Airlines,  prior to going to Eastern and 727's, way back when.
Title: Re: C47's
Post by: earl1937 on May 07, 2014, 05:19:32 PM
Where did you get this information from?  As far as I know it is not correct.  I have several thousand hours in DC3's used for passenger service by Monmouth Airlines,  prior to going to Eastern and 727's, way back when.
:airplane: Man, if you were typed in the "3 holer" then you were from way back! I am not sure where it got his info on the gear on the "spad" or "gooney bird", but I too never heard of that!
Title: Re: C47's
Post by: earl1937 on May 07, 2014, 05:20:35 PM
Those down hill takeoffs can be odd in that after "lifting off" you might still be descending.
:airplane: Was wondering if anyone would catch that and comment! How true old friend!
Title: Re: C47's
Post by: colmbo on May 07, 2014, 06:14:17 PM
Sink rate minimized…Gear Up!