Aces High Bulletin Board

General Forums => Aircraft and Vehicles => Topic started by: Slade on January 02, 2015, 08:49:49 AM

Title: Tri-Level Cons vs. Ideal Plane(s)
Post by: Slade on January 02, 2015, 08:49:49 AM
Hey all,

In a scenario where you have cons below you, co-alt and above you, which plane(s) do you feel handle surviving\thriving in this environment the best and why?

Of course it is the pilot that should have ample SA but the context of this thread is the PLANE.

Some thoughts I had for this scenario are:

What are your thoughts on what plane(s) handle this scenario the best?


Thanks,

Slade  :salute
Title: Re: Tri-Level Cons vs. Ideal Plane(s)
Post by: Arlo on January 02, 2015, 09:13:37 AM
Spits and Zekes? To everything turn,turn,turn.
Title: Re: Tri-Level Cons vs. Ideal Plane(s)
Post by: Karnak on January 02, 2015, 09:19:07 AM
Hmmm.  Seems to me you need all round performance or to be very good in a turny bird.  Yak-3, La-7, Ki-84, Spitfire Mk VIII, Spitfire Mk XVI, Bf109F-4, Bf109G-2.  The Spits are kinda marginal due to their fragility and the Yak-3 and Bf109s are marginal due to light firepower.  I think the planes on top really make it rough for E builders that aren't that maneuverable such as the Bf109K-4 and Spitfire Mk XIV.  Speed birds like the P-51D, Typhoon, Fw190D-9, P-47M and Tempest could likely dive out and run, but that is conceding control of the airspace to the enemy, better than being shot down but not winning for sure.  A great turny bird pilot might be able to do it in the A6M3, A6M5, FM2, N1K2-J or Hurricane Mk IIc.
Title: Re: Tri-Level Cons vs. Ideal Plane(s)
Post by: BuckShot on January 02, 2015, 12:30:19 PM
Ki-84, to take it uphill the whole time
Title: Re: Tri-Level Cons vs. Ideal Plane(s)
Post by: cobia38 on January 02, 2015, 04:12:15 PM
 B5N,no other fighter can roll from dead stop and climb through the entire mess killing everything in it path  :ahand
Title: Re: Tri-Level Cons vs. Ideal Plane(s)
Post by: MK-84 on January 02, 2015, 07:24:19 PM
109k4, I can dive to get away and build energy faster than likely any of them can if I need to.
Title: Re: Tri-Level Cons vs. Ideal Plane(s)
Post by: icepac on January 03, 2015, 08:55:23 AM
It depends entirely on how much room you have below you.
Title: Re: Tri-Level Cons vs. Ideal Plane(s)
Post by: Slade on January 03, 2015, 09:01:05 PM
Quote
It depends entirely on how much room you have below you.

How would you answer if you were say 8k in this scenario?
Title: Re: Tri-Level Cons vs. Ideal Plane(s)
Post by: SPKmes on January 03, 2015, 09:24:58 PM
Ki61 ... I may not win...but it'll a good time till I die...or win....who knows....I may just pull off some goods shots

basics though...a spit V up or Ki84 are able to adapt to all types of fight in reasonably quick time (my opinion)
Title: Re: Tri-Level Cons vs. Ideal Plane(s)
Post by: bozon on January 03, 2015, 10:15:20 PM
Mosquito.
Because if you die, try to do it in the coolest plane you can find.
Title: Re: Tri-Level Cons vs. Ideal Plane(s)
Post by: Skyyr on January 03, 2015, 10:36:15 PM
Me 163 or Me 262.
Title: Re: Tri-Level Cons vs. Ideal Plane(s)
Post by: Slade on January 03, 2015, 10:58:57 PM
Quote
Me 163 or Me 262.

Thanks.  How about non-perk rides?
Title: Re: Tri-Level Cons vs. Ideal Plane(s)
Post by: Latrobe on January 04, 2015, 05:02:27 AM
Depends on what planes you're going up against and a bunch of other factors but my vote goes for the 109F. It can just simply out fight everything in the skies when used right :)
Title: Re: Tri-Level Cons vs. Ideal Plane(s)
Post by: MK-84 on January 04, 2015, 06:17:30 PM
Depends on what planes you're going up against and a bunch of other factors but my vote goes for the 109F. It can just simply out fight everything in the skies when used right :)

Your answer to everything is the 109F.

MK84: "hey latrobe, what is the best coffee maker"?
Latrobe: "The 109F"

See :rolleyes:
Title: Re: Tri-Level Cons vs. Ideal Plane(s)
Post by: BaldEagl on January 04, 2015, 11:34:16 PM
Well... I'd want a tri-plane of course.
Title: Re: Tri-Level Cons vs. Ideal Plane(s)
Post by: Latrobe on January 05, 2015, 02:18:37 AM
Your answer to everything is the 109F.

MK84: "hey latrobe, what is the best coffee maker"?
Latrobe: "The 109F"

See :rolleyes:

Well it is! have you ever seen a 109F make coffee before!? best coffee ever!  :neener:





(seriously, fly the 109F and you'll know why it's the best  :P )
Title: Re: Tri-Level Cons vs. Ideal Plane(s)
Post by: Crash Orange on January 05, 2015, 03:23:36 AM
(seriously, fly the 109F and you'll know why it's the best  :P )

I flew the 109F in the last Malta scenario and it left no doubt in my mind about why the Spit V is the best.
Title: Re: Tri-Level Cons vs. Ideal Plane(s)
Post by: darkzking on January 05, 2015, 03:30:10 AM
sorry Latrobe but p39 is a far superior aircraft :devil
Title: Re: Tri-Level Cons vs. Ideal Plane(s)
Post by: Latrobe on January 05, 2015, 04:03:51 AM
sorry Latrobe but p39 is a far superior aircraft :devil

having a bigger gun doesn't make you better!  :P

We should do some P39 fighter sweeps though.
Title: Re: Tri-Level Cons vs. Ideal Plane(s)
Post by: darkzking on January 05, 2015, 04:04:50 AM
Latrobe next time were both on p39 fighter sweeps  :devil
Title: Re: Tri-Level Cons vs. Ideal Plane(s)
Post by: Slade on January 05, 2015, 10:23:26 AM
Quote
109F

Love that plane.  I do get plenty of firing solutions with it.  Not as many kills proportional to most other birds.  Weird.

I mean I see plenty of hit sprites.  Just not so many leading to kills as other planes.

Does anyone else have that issue with the 109f?
Title: Re: Tri-Level Cons vs. Ideal Plane(s)
Post by: Aspen on January 05, 2015, 11:56:01 AM
KI84, mainly because its the plane I know the best.  Its top speed and dive won't outrun many late war planes, but it's climb, acceleration, durability and turning ability make it a good furball survivor.

Its a good vert fighter, but plenty of planes out climb it - Spit 8, 14, 16, LA7, 109G2, G6, G14, K4, etc.  It's a great plane if you want to wade into trouble and stay engaged until you or the other guys are dead.  If you want to survive by being able to separate and reset, a faster plane would be a better choice.
Title: Re: Tri-Level Cons vs. Ideal Plane(s)
Post by: Bino on January 05, 2015, 01:43:10 PM
In a scenario where you have cons below you, co-alt and above you, ...

I rarely see bandits above me, as I habitually fly in what we of JG11 call the Zoneysphere.   ;)

Variants of the FW-190 tend to do fairly well up there.

YMMV
Title: Re: Tri-Level Cons vs. Ideal Plane(s)
Post by: Zoney on January 05, 2015, 01:49:52 PM
I rarely see bandits above me, as I habitually fly in what we of JG11 call the Zoneysphere.   ;)

Variants of the FW-190 tend to do fairly well up there.

YMMV


 :O
Title: Re: Tri-Level Cons vs. Ideal Plane(s)
Post by: ink on January 05, 2015, 05:53:21 PM
KI84, mainly because its the plane I know the best.  Its top speed and dive won't outrun many late war planes, but it's climb, acceleration, durability and turning ability make it a good furball survivor.

Its a good vert fighter, but plenty of planes out climb it - Spit 8, 14, 16, LA7, 109G2, G6, G14, K4, etc.  It's a great plane if you want to wade into trouble and stay engaged until you or the other guys are dead.  If you want to survive by being able to separate and reset, a faster plane would be a better choice.


 :aok
Title: Re: Tri-Level Cons vs. Ideal Plane(s)
Post by: save on January 07, 2015, 12:16:10 AM
My vote go to the Yak-3 due to its super-climb angle, manoeuvrability, and its one of the hardest fighter to down in game, its only drawback is its twin cannon (corrected in the  Yak3p model, also with a better engine).
Title: Re: Tri-Level Cons vs. Ideal Plane(s)
Post by: darkzking on January 07, 2015, 01:33:48 AM
p39, p40, hurricane mk1, ki43 all of these way better choices
Title: Re: Tri-Level Cons vs. Ideal Plane(s)
Post by: Slade on January 07, 2015, 06:04:58 AM
Quote
p39, p40, hurricane mk1, ki43 all of these way better choices

Why?
Title: Re: Tri-Level Cons vs. Ideal Plane(s)
Post by: Latrobe on January 07, 2015, 07:17:37 AM
because raynos is weird  ;)
Title: Re: Tri-Level Cons vs. Ideal Plane(s)
Post by: caldera on January 07, 2015, 11:12:55 AM
The Me-410 is the obvious answer.
Title: Re: Tri-Level Cons vs. Ideal Plane(s)
Post by: Slade on January 07, 2015, 11:26:39 AM
I am finding the Yak-9u a great fighter for this type scenario.  GREAT viz.  Climbs and maneuvers good.  You do have to really conserve ammo but when that thing hits (at 300 or less) IT HITS.  They go down folks.

Great other points here all.  Yak-3, Turny birds etc.  So easy to make a case when you understand a plane well.



[sidebar]
I think about plane performance, matchups, how to get modest planes to be really effective...

I am so glad there is a game like AH for peeps like me with this affliction.  :salute to all of you.
[/sidebar]