Aces High Bulletin Board

General Forums => Wishlist => Topic started by: ONTOS on January 28, 2016, 03:42:01 PM

Title: PTAB's
Post by: ONTOS on January 28, 2016, 03:42:01 PM
It's been asked a while back, but the PTAB (cluster) bombs the IL-2 carried in WW2 would be a good addition.
Title: Re: PTAB's
Post by: bustr on January 28, 2016, 09:19:43 PM
It's been asked many times in the past with no answer.

There is too much of a chance this single munition would cause players to cancel their accounts who already are very unhappy about General Purpose bombs at their GV spawn battles. If you don't care about dying, just like ord and radar suicide porking across a whole front which PO's people. You up, scream over to the GV spawn battle below radar, popup out of the grass and let fly with all 32. It takes no skill to use a shotgun at close rand and it only takes one to blow a hole in a tank body and fry the crew. Keep in mind the Yak 9D and Yak 7b could carry them. The IL2 can fly above wirbel range and rain PTAB on a tank assault or just whizz on wirbels and osti out of gun range. Then players would come into these forums and scream at Hitech, while some would cancel their subscriptions.

This munitions' ability to destabilize game play is probably similar to why our B29 doesn't have an atom bomb or our Lancasters the 12,000 and 24,000 pound bombs.
Title: Re: PTAB's
Post by: Zimme83 on January 29, 2016, 01:11:45 AM
And the difference from dive bombing w a 1 ton bomb from a Tu-2 is...?
With 1000kg:s its enough if the bombs land in the same county. Low lancs or B-17:S w 100lbs create just as big shotgun effect as an Il-2 w PTAB would do. So it would not be any dramatic change except that the Il-2 would prob become more popular.
Title: Re: PTAB's
Post by: bustr on January 29, 2016, 03:07:56 AM
Try to find vehicles from the air in the beta and keep them eyeballed while you attempt to setup an attack run if they are in the trees. The PTAB comes in magazines of 32. And even a blind squirrel finds nuts.

Guess you were not in the closed alpha when we couldn't find stampf's panther in the trees to bomb it at TT on NDisles. I've built an AH3 terrain already with static tank hulks in the trees at two locations to practice driving through forests and flying over head for making out tanks from the trees. Any thick clump of trees and tanks can only be found by flying in the grass to look in through the trunks. It's a given, a vet with jabo skills, yes he may get a 1000lb close enough for a concussion kill. Give a newbie 32 tiny shaped charge PTAB to scatter between the foliage at the GV's general location, GVers will quit the game. Give me 32 PTAB and I'll help them leave because I don't like the complimentary wirbels that always show up after I've smoked 3 or 4 tanks with my IL2. And I would use them purposely to punish all of those commander mode wing shooters.

I suspect I wouldn't be alone as a vet to just how horrible I would make GVers lives with PTABs. Newbies would never carry real bombs to kill GVs once they discovered PTABs.
Title: Re: PTAB's
Post by: Zacherof on January 29, 2016, 10:39:44 AM
I never understood the whine of oh he bombed me. Your red, thus a target. Frankly my favorite battles were the gv and plane fights. Fly in low and bomb enemy gvs so grimes lies can break through and then move to air targets. And if there's a tt on a map I always take a bomb in case someone climbed above so I can dispatch him
Title: Re: PTAB's
Post by: Devil 505 on January 29, 2016, 11:20:34 AM
I never understood the whine of oh he bombed me. Your red, thus a target. Frankly my favorite battles were the gv and plane fights. Fly in low and bomb enemy gvs so grimes lies can break through and then move to air targets. And if there's a tt on a map I always take a bomb in case someone climbed above so I can dispatch him

Especially since GVs are in this game specifically to be bait for attack planes. GVers just need to accept their place in the food chain.
Title: Re: PTAB's
Post by: BuckShot on January 29, 2016, 12:57:33 PM
Bring back old gv icon distances!
Title: Re: PTAB's
Post by: bustr on January 29, 2016, 02:48:12 PM
If nothing about GV icons is changed when AH3 goes live. Once a GV pulls back under the trees into the shadows, you will have to carpet bomb a whole grove of trees for one Jeep. It was like that in WW2.

In the open beta forum look in the link below for my IL2 picture in my reply posting. I included a film of flying it through the new tank town tree groves on my gunnery practice terrain. For every out in the open tank you can make out in the video, there are about 4 or 5 hidden under the trees.

You will not be able to play back that video unless you have the current beta installed on your PC.

http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/smf/index.php/topic,377346.15.html
Title: Re: PTAB's
Post by: Chris79 on January 30, 2016, 10:06:10 AM
Especially since GVs are in this game specifically to be bait for attack planes. GVers just need to accept their place in the food chain.

Exactly, I do on occasion like a good gv battle, but I always expect to egged. GVs are food, no more, no less.
Title: Re: PTAB's
Post by: Randy1 on January 30, 2016, 10:20:59 AM
The balance is to make this game as enjoyable as you can for the most people you can

Bombing a heavy spawn camp is good to clear out the spawn.

Bombing a good tank fight, not so good from a tankers view.

Dive bombing TUs is getting out of hand seems like.

A big -1 on this wish.  The ILs are strong enough now.

Title: Re: PTAB's
Post by: BuckShot on January 30, 2016, 11:25:43 AM
+1 for ptab
Title: Re: PTAB's
Post by: JimmyD3 on January 30, 2016, 12:07:30 PM
Tell you what, put the turret speed back to where it was for the Wirbl and Osti, extend the effective range of the Wirbl to the same as the Osti, THEN give the IL2 the PTAB. :D
Title: Re: PTAB's
Post by: ONTOS on January 30, 2016, 01:28:52 PM
PTAB's were designed primarily for ground vehicles, therefore,the IL-2's should have this weapon as part of their ordnance lay out. This is war man. :salute
Title: Re: PTAB's
Post by: bustr on January 30, 2016, 03:01:13 PM
No this is a game in which Hitech has to balance human nature against paying his bills every month.

Human Nature - We have the B29, it dropped the A-bomb in WW2, this is a war man. Give us the nuke.

Paying the bills:

1. -The only Small caliber AA gun in the game you can man on a field that shoots to it's fuse's full "time to self destruct" is the 3.7cm Flak36 at 4700yds.

2. - The osti has the 3.7cm flack36 but it's fuse has been shortend to 2700yds.

3. - The wirbel has the 2-cm Flakvierling 38 which is the 4 barrel 20mm auto ack on fields. The range for the 6sec fuse is 2400yds, the auto ack shoots that far. The 2-cm Flakvierling 38 in the wirbel shoots effectively to 1200yds.

This has been the case for 14 years. So when you can get Hitech to change the fuse for the osti and wirbel rounds to their full range. Then you will probably get the PTAB. Minor things but, they would have a large impact on game play. By making people less inclined to login knowing everywhere they go, is a good chance some weeny in a wirble will shotgun tag them almost 3000yds away from anything important including furballing on the deck. Then fill an arena with the new AH3 trees and ground clutter, the game would become wirbel \osti wars to grief the players who actually want to "fly and fight in planes" anymore. Not to mention I would have to release new gunsights for the wirbel and osti.....
Title: Re: PTAB's
Post by: Zacherof on January 30, 2016, 03:08:15 PM
Nvm bustr beat me
Title: Re: PTAB's
Post by: ONTOS on January 30, 2016, 04:16:29 PM
Yes, this is a game, but no need to deny ordnance to a plane that's main purpose was ground attack.  People use Lancaster's (3)with a 42,000 lb bomb load to bomb tanks. People use He 111's with 32  50kg bombs and every bomber in between to bomb tank's, when the main purpose was to bomb building's, bridges, and other structure's. People play this game for various reason's and want to be happy doing it. I understand. A balance of play is needed to keep everyone happy. If this is going to make player's unhappy, I withdraw the request. :salute
Title: Re: PTAB's
Post by: BuckShot on January 30, 2016, 04:40:12 PM
Introduce the Po-2 along with the ptabs. It carried them too.
Title: Re: PTAB's
Post by: bustr on January 30, 2016, 05:08:23 PM
And along with my stated revulsion for wirbels while in an IL2, you two will help me cause a mass GV player bail from the game to a competitor.

You have only two choices just like with the B29 and no nuke for it. And the shortened fuses for the wirbel and osti:

1. - Hitech balances play for "Everyone" and pays the bills.

2. - You have about a week of fun until no one wants to play AH3 to drive tanks anymore because of weenies with PTAB. We were loosing players before commander mode due to the IL2 and B-25H slaughtering them. Some of that was my bad because they were sitting ducks with the old view mode.

And why do you two keep saying it has to be added emphatically? Because you believe it will make you nearly untouchable killers of GVs with next to no effort or skill. Hitech tends to give us what he believes we need, not what we believe we want.
Title: Re: PTAB's
Post by: Ack-Ack on January 30, 2016, 08:36:09 PM
In addition to the PTAB, I would also like to see the M29 and Butterfly Bomb introduced as well.  Hopefully we'll see expanded ordnance options in the upcoming AH3.
Title: Re: PTAB's
Post by: ONTOS on January 30, 2016, 09:34:25 PM
I believe we have been losing players because of cheaters and hacks.  I know, HTC can't be hacked and there are no cheater's.
This is a wish list. I could wish for anything, thats what the wish list is for, wishing.

I do not keep saying we have to have them. If you read my last entry, I said I withdraw the request.

Why do you act as though you have a thistle up your kilt ?