Aces High Bulletin Board
General Forums => Films and Screenshots => Topic started by: caldera on May 21, 2017, 12:49:14 PM
-
Thought for sure a Ki-84 could out turn a C.202, especially with a true ace at the controls. Or maybe my plane has an A6M icon. :noid
-
Thought for sure a Ki-84 could out turn a C.202, especially with a true ace at the controls.
Technically he did out-turn you. That reversal is never going to work against someone who spends his days managing overshoots. I'm wondering why, when it didn't work for the first say five times, you didn't consider employing a different tactic?
-
Technically he did out-turn you. That reversal is never going to work against someone who spends his days managing overshoots. I'm wondering why, when it didn't work for the first say five times, you didn't consider employing a different tactic?
What tactic should I have used. Out run him?
-
What tactic should I have used. Out run him?
Ah, sarcasm. So for the second time in one week I have to ask film-posters what their purpose was. Were you hoping for exclusively moral support at being ravaged for 18 minutes by the lametard who wouldn't fight your fight? And to compliment you on flying inferior aircraft as a service to the community? I suggested to you before flying inferioir planes has disadvantages as well as advantages.
Who do you think was the more skilful flyer and by how much of a margin?
-
Ah, sarcasm. So for the second time in one week I have to ask film-posters what their purpose was. Were you hoping for exclusively moral support at being ravaged for 18 minutes by the lametard who wouldn't fight your fight? And to compliment you on flying inferior aircraft as a service to the community? I suggested to you before flying inferioir planes has disadvantages as well as advantages.
Who do you think was the more skilful flyer and by how much of a margin?
You've already made up your mind before seeing the film. What is your reason for posting here?
-
You've already made up your mind before seeing the film.
Yes indeed, I am a completely prejudicial cad and bounder who has ruined your innocent thread posted in the proper Help & Training forum entitled: "How can I counter this 1-on-1 tactic which I don't understand yet am not at all resentful of?".
You don't have an alternative tactic or selection of ACM to apply in this situation do you? Do you even recognize how skillfully Ahiru put you in exactly the position he wanted, with patience, discipline, an adaptive technique and a knowledge of the relationship between angles and energy which you don't have? Do you understand the mechanism of what he was doing, how it worked and where he was vulnerable?
A more condensed and pointed treatise on the proper application of BnZ you'd be hard-pressed to find. Instead of taking this as a learning opportunity or even asking for technical help with that you instead come hear looking for endorsement.
What is your reason for posting here?
Torturing the disingenuous?
-
It was such a skillful display that it took 18 him minutes and about 30 attempts to work.
Your torture is about as effective.
-
It was such a skillful display that it took 18 him minutes and about 30 attempts to work.
He could've dropped on your six and stayed there at his leisure and you couldn't have done anthing about it except burn up your energy for no return. Perhaps he was simply enjoying playing with his squeaky toy.
Your torture is about as effective.
No sense, no feeling.
-
Ah, sarcasm. So for the second time in one week I have to ask film-posters what their purpose was. Were you hoping for exclusively moral support at being ravaged for 18 minutes by the lametard who wouldn't fight your fight? And to compliment you on flying inferior aircraft as a service to the community? I suggested to you before flying inferioir planes has disadvantages as well as advantages.
Who do you think was the more skilful flyer and by how much of a margin?
This comment is unnecessary and not an answer to the question asked. Nrshida, you should apologize for escalating this into an argument. And if I was to determine who was the better flyer, I vote for caldera.
-
This comment is unnecessary and not an answer to the question asked.
And had he asked a question I would not have attacked.
Nrshida, you should apologize for escalating this into an argument.
What argument? His position is indefensible.
You want me to apologise for blowing the whistle on a public, resentful, covert-criticism of another player’s unwillingness to engage in a fight which would unfairly favour the OP, who has inferior ACM and masks that beneath an inferior aircraft choice pretending to be less lame than the other player in this engagement while at the same time being too prideful to actually put his self-image aside and learn?
And if I was to determine who was the better flyer, I vote for caldera.
On what grounds? One ineffective and predictable reversal repeated endlessly and ineffectively without variation? Because the other player flew pure BnZ and that’s automatically lame?
You seem like a decent chap Kenne. If it's any explanation to you some people just irritate me into Prak mode.
-
Yeah shida stop being mean and apologize. :rofl
-
And had he asked a question I would not have attacked.
What argument? His position is indefensible.
You want me to apologise for blowing the whistle on a public, resentful, covert-criticism of another player’s unwillingness to engage in a fight which would unfairly favour the OP, who has inferior ACM and masks that beneath an inferior aircraft choice pretending to be less lame than the other player in this engagement while at the same time being too prideful to actually put his self-image aside and learn?
On what grounds? One ineffective and predictable reversal repeated endlessly and ineffectively without variation? Because the other player flew pure BnZ and that’s automatically lame?
You seem like a decent chap Kenne. If it's any explanation to you some people just irritate me into Prak mode.
prat. he did ask a question. 'what tactic should I have used..out run him?' looks like a question to me.
the 84 is making repeated attacks for no result. appears the 84 pilot needs practice not the 202.
-
prat.
No, Prak.
he did ask a question. 'what tactic should I have used..out run him?' looks like a question to me.
On the surface. You don't think the title of the thread, the title of the film, the sarcastic use of the term 'true ace', the fact the film is not posted in Help & Training and the underlying implication of the lameness of Ahiru and Caldera's previous reaction to criticism is suggestive? I do.
the 84 is making repeated attacks for no result. appears the 84 pilot needs practice not the 202.
Repeated attacks you say? I see quite a different flow in the fight. Ahiru's technique is purely BnZ-based. That is unconnected to his plane preference. It is what he considers to be his art. As long as players choose to implicate some level of gheyness to the BnZ proponent, instead of learning to understand the technique, they are doomed to suffer from it. If you make that easier, lazier, arrogant-ignorant choice, then don't come to the forums whining about it, exclusively expecting an ego stroke.
-
Yeah shida stop being mean and apologize. :rofl
(http://i1114.photobucket.com/albums/k526/rwrk2/stirpot.gif)
-
On the surface. You don't think the title of the thread, the title of the film, the sarcastic use of the term 'true ace', the fact the film is not posted in Help & Training and the underlying implication of the lameness of Ahiru and Caldera's previous reaction to criticism is suggestive? I do.
of course you do, you must take this POV to create the illusion of being offended.
Repeated attacks you say? I see quite a different flow in the fight. Ahiru's technique is purely BnZ-based. That is unconnected to his plane preference. It is what he considers to be his art. As long as players choose to implicate some level of gheyness to the BnZ proponent, instead of learning to understand the technique, they are doomed to suffer from it. If you make that easier, lazier, arrogant-ignorant choice, then don't come to the forums whining about it, exclusively expecting an ego stroke.
the fact that I am coming into this thread fresh means I have no prejudices to justify. your escalation of this into an argument would indicate you have.
gheyness
this speaks volumes about you.
-
Just curious, anyone else think Kenne = Caldera
-
of course you do, you must take this POV to create the illusion of being offended.
I object to a pattern of behaviour and comment on it as I am free to do. As are you. You disagree with my position and apparently want to defend Caldera. I think this is an even more arbitrary position so the argument you are intent on having with me is a bit, well hollow.
the fact that I am coming into this thread fresh means I have no prejudices to justify.
And less experience to judge. A prejudice is a preconceived opinion not based on reason or actual experience. This is not the case.
your escalation of this into an argument would indicate you have.
It's not an argument, it's an ideological difference. And one which Caldera can't defend. Looks like I'm triggering a prejudice in you by taking this position. Which is fine. Knock yourself out. Say whatever you like. You never know, maybe you even hit on something which resonates and I might even address it.
this speaks volumes about you.
If you read what I said carefully you can see it's a labelling of other people's attitudes not mine.
-
I object to a pattern of behaviour and comment on it as I am free to do. As are you. You disagree with my position and apparently want to defend Caldera. I think this is an even more arbitrary position so the argument you are intent on having with me is a bit, well hollow.
And less experience to judge. A prejudice is a preconceived opinion not based on reason or actual experience. This is not the case.
It's not an argument, it's an ideological difference. And one which Caldera can't defend. Looks like I'm triggering a prejudice in you by taking this position. Which is fine. Knock yourself out. Say whatever you like. You never know, maybe you even hit on something which resonates and I might even address it.
If you read what I said carefully you can see it's a labelling of other people's attitudes not mine.
Hey, Caldera asked a question, that you denied he even asked. You, in your own words, 'attacked' as if he did not ask said question, therefore you did so without provocation. (Because you said if he had asked a question you would not have attacked.) all that you said after is invalid.
-
Hey, Caldera asked a question, that you denied he even asked. You, in your own words, 'attacked' as if he did not ask said question, therefore you did so without provocation. (Because you said if he had asked a question you would not have attacked.) all that you said after is invalid.
Logic isn't your best attribute is it bud.
-
Hey, Caldera asked a question, that you denied he even asked. You, in your own words, 'attacked' as if he did not ask said question, therefore you did so without provocation. (Because you said if he had asked a question you would not have attacked.) all that you said after is invalid.
Don't bother continuing this. He's letting the crazy flow through him.
He just has a problem with me and so be it. My mistake was answering him in the first place.
(http://i343.photobucket.com/albums/o460/caldera_08/troll.jpg~original) (http://s343.photobucket.com/user/caldera_08/media/troll.jpg.html)
-
...
-
Logic isn't your best attribute is it bud.
It's too late to apologize.
-
...and there it is, resorting to memes & insults. Argumentum ad hominem. Yup, clearly hit absolutely no raw nerves at all did I. :rofl
-
...and there it is, resorting to memes & insults. Argumentum ad hominem. Yup, clearly hit absolutely no raw nerves at all did I. :rofl
Well, when you have become so belligerent, ad hom is just a response to that.
-
Well, when you have become so belligerent, ad hom is just a response to that.
What an informative parallel that an ad hominem attack on Ahiru is precisely what initiated this in the first place.
I have argued my objection rationally and consistently through this thread. Your appeal to reason lasted what, one post? An attempt to portray me as becoming increasingly irrational and beligerent is pathetically desperate. You joined in insulting and arguing ad hominem even editing your post above informing that the Star Trek character in the meme was played by a woman and laughing, which - in counter-riposte - says a lot about you.
It is interesting that not one of my points was argued or countered rationally. Looks like you are as vacuous in argument as Caldera is in ACM.
-
What an informative parallel that an ad hominem attack on Ahiru is precisely what initiated this in the first place.
I have argued my objection rationally and consistently through this thread. Your appeal to reason lasted what, one post? An attempt to portray me as becoming increasingly irrational and beligerent is pathetically desperate. You joined in insulting and arguing ad hominem even editing your post above informing that the Star Trek character in the meme was played by a woman and laughing, which - in counter-riposte - says a lot about you.
It is interesting that not one of my points was argued or countered rationally. Looks like you are as vacuous in argument as Caldera is in ACM.
How can you keep using the term 'argue' when you have said this is not, it is an 'ideological difference.'
And you don't need me to show you are 'irrational and belligerent'
Points!, what points? you attacked a fellow player without provocation.
-
Sheesh guys, give it up already, we get it, you don't agree.
Move on
Kenne is my friend :)
Nrshida is my friend :)
Caldera is my friend :)
-
Sheesh guys, give it up already, we get it, you don't agree.
Move on
Kenne is my friend :)
Nrshida is my friend :)
Caldera is my friend :)
Well he started it! :)
-
Sheesh guys, give it up already, we get it, you don't agree.
Move on
Kenne is my friend :)
Nrshida is my friend :)
Caldera is my friend :)
Now you have that James Taylor song stuck in my head. Damn you! :bhead
J/K :cheers:
-
you attacked a fellow player without provocation.
And Ahiru's provocation of Caldera was what? That he didn't let the poor sensitive boy win. How blind can you be?
How can you keep using the term 'argue' when you have said this is not, it is an 'ideological difference.'
That embarrassing moment when you realise your opponent isn't able to understand the difference between argument and argue. I'd recommend he looked up some definitions but how would he first look up the word dictionary?
Move on
Actually I have indeed already moved on and am eagerly awaiting Caldera's next film in which he will fly a Fokker D.VII against AH’s newly-introduced F-16 entitled '6.4 seconds fighting my own bladder control.ahf'. Introduced in a thread in which the opening remark will be: 'Why didn't I win? I can flat turn this biplane really well'.
:salute Zoney.
-
And Ahiru's provocation of Caldera was what? That he didn't let the poor sensitive boy win. How blind can you be?
That embarrassing moment when you realise your opponent isn't able to understand the difference between argument and argue. I'd recommend he looked up some definitions but how would he first look up the word dictionary?
Actually I have indeed already moved on and am eagerly awaiting Caldera's next film in which he will fly a Fokker D.VII against AH’s newly-introduced F-16 entitled '6.4 seconds fighting my own bladder control.ahf'. Introduced in a thread in which the opening remark will be: 'Why didn't I win? I can flat turn this biplane really well'. :salute Zoney.
Ahiru is not in this thread..IS HE? THIS THREAD, THIS THREAD! I see no comment in this thread from him. YOU ARE the one that made the smart remark in the fourth response. YOU escalated this thread. Why could you not answer calderas question from the third response AS ASKED?
If there is a word from the dictionary to look up, you should look up the word 'tact'.
-
Ahiru is not in this thread..IS HE? THIS THREAD, THIS THREAD!
This thread was brought to you by butthurt caused by Ahiru’s flying style. Don’t be obtuse & ridiculous.
YOU ARE the one that made the smart remark in the fourth response. YOU escalated this thread.
There was nothing to escalate. I just described it less disingenuously. Smart remark? Are you a school teacher?
Why could you not answer calderas question from the third response AS ASKED?
If it was a genuine question I could've answered in great detail. But I'm more selctive in who I help these days.
-
Ahiru normally fights when encouraged but I had him in base ack for 5minutes the other morning woulda have bet my house that it was kamurogi.
Maybe he is not feeling it in his uber ride. I know where your coming from snuggie he should have manned the hell up it's people like him that ruin the game. No fun, no fun at all.
:salute
-
Maybe he is not feeling it in his uber ride.
Going to have to call you out on this point bruv. You continually make such remarks about the Ki-84 (even though I know you like to fly it). You realise, given this comparison using Gonzo's charts:-
http://www.gonzoville.com/charts/index.php
That in saying this you therefore have to concede that the Spit 8 is more uber. I have also seen you say elsewhere that a Spit8 will beat a Ki-84 in a duel with similar pilots. Then you seem to link planes and energy fighting to not 'manning up'. I think that's a bit inconsistent.
-
See Rule #4
-
See Rule #4
-
See Rule #2
-
See Rule #4
-
Don't fly a lesser plane and expect people to fight your fight.
-
See Rule #4
-
See Rule #4
-
See Rule #4
-
See Rule #4
-
See Rule #4
Just wanted in on it. :D
-
See Rule #4
Just wanted in on it. :D
:D When you hit three of those in a row Major Woody, you get PMs from players asking to 'meet' you. :rofl
-
nrshida you have been on this boards a lot but I have not seen you flying.....Shading?.....BTW that Ahiru guy is one of the most timid flyers.
-
:D When you hit three of those in a row Major Woody, you get PMs from players asking to 'meet' you. :rofl
I guess I'd better step it up a bit. :cheers:
-
nrshida you have been on this boards a lot but I have not seen you flying.....Shading?
I wish Rud3. End of AH2 put me out. Have eventually acquired an AH3-capable machine but presently no subscription. Working on my new flight gear. Then I can play with Caldera and Kenne. "I will hug them and squeeze them and call them George".
-
.....BTW that Ahiru guy is one of the most timid flyers.
What is worse? A player who quietly flies around doing his own thing, bothering no one besides through the clash of different ACM styles. Or a hate campaign instigated by those too lazy, un-evolved or arrogant to do the work to deal with said ACM?
-
I guess I'd better step it up a bit. :cheers:
Arguing with savages is like mud-wrestling Woody. Even if you do hold them face down until they say uncle, you still get covered in mud. It's a hobby for the tremendously bored and overly moralistic.
-
Replies segmented for the convenience of Skuzzy's just and fair Rule #4ing :)
-
Or a hate campaign instigated by those too lazy, un-evolved or arrogant to do the work to deal with said ACM?
You said it, 'Hate campaign'
I go back to the beginning of this thread, you are the one that started with the negative remarks.
You don't even fly and you have the gall to bad mouth caldera.
-
You said it, 'Hate campaign'
I have spread no hatred. I did not resort to derogatory memes. I have not used the term woman as a derogatory comment nor crazy nor 'man up' to describe my opponents in this discussion. Neither of you can say the same.
I know you think you're right. I don't agree and there's NOTHING you can do about that. Still here I am. That's how life works.
You don't even fly and you have the gall to bad mouth caldera.
As completely irrelevant to the discussion as your insults and ad hominum attacks.
I'll be back flying soonest. If it satisfies your uncontainable rage, I'd be more than happy to duel both of you at your convenience.
-
I have spread no hatred. I did not resort to derogatory memes. I have not used the term woman as a derogatory comment nor crazy nor 'man up' to describe my opponents in this discussion. Neither of you can say the same.
I know you think you're right. I don't agree and there's NOTHING you can do about that. Still here I am. That's how life works.
As completely irrelevant to the discussion as your insults and ad hominum attacks.
I'll be back flying soonest. If it satisfies your uncontainable rage, I'd be more than happy to duel both of you at your convenience.
You don't fly..that is just great. :rofl :rofl :rofl
No wonder you are so set against caldera..he's flying and you're not.
You do not want to critique his flying, because you cant. You don't fly!
I do have to apologize when I said that perhaps caldera bested you, but we know that is not true because you
don't fly. and here I am thinking that you were a Vudu, or a Flossy, or a Brooke with EXTENSIVE experience.
-
You don't fly..that is just great. :rofl :rofl :rofl
Love the way you think this, out of everything I’ve said is the closest thing you can find to thinking you’re victorious. Talk about grasping at straws.
When, by the way, you don’t address my points, such as the hate-based insulting and mocking which you and Caldera did - and I didn’t, then you concede my points. You’re mistaking not having to counter with not being able to counter.
I do have to apologize when I said that perhaps caldera bested you, but we know that is not true because you don't fly. and here I am thinking that you were a Vudu, or a Flossy, or a Brooke with EXTENSIVE experience.
If you think hours map directly to capability in this game then you are so far out of your depth of understanding you are truly making a fool out of yourself.
Offer’s there if you want to duel me and find out what a reflective approach produces, rather than the result-focussed, ego-protecting it’s-all-my-opponent’s-fault approach evidenced at the start of this thread. Perhaps you'll even beat me and achieve what you've wanted from the start of this thread: to shut me up.
-
Love the way you think this, out of everything I’ve said is the closest thing you can find to thinking you’re victorious. Talk about grasping at straws.
When, by the way, you don’t address my points, such as the hate-based insulting and mocking which you and Caldera did - and I didn’t, then you concede my points. You’re mistaking not having to counter with not being able to counter.
If you think hours map directly to capability in this game then you are so far out of your depth of understanding you are truly making a fool out of yourself.
Offer’s there if you want to duel me and find out what a reflective approach produces, rather than the result-focussed, ego-protecting it’s-all-my-opponent’s-fault approach evidenced at the start of this thread. Perhaps you'll even beat me and achieve what you've wanted from the start of this thread: to shut me up.
You want some cheese with that whine?
four pages of back n forth and you're not even a pilot.
how long has AH3 been out..a year!
"Hey, my name is Nrshida, I don't do what you do, but I can tell what you are doing wrong!"
-
"Hey, my name is Nrshida, I don't do what you do, but I can tell what you are doing wrong!"
No I don't do what he does. I can kill Ahiru from a -e starting point.
-
You want some cheese with that whine?
I honestly can't see a whine. If only it were so Kenne, that simply saying something really hard made it true. What I do notice however is that for the second time you have evaded my invitation to fly against me and find out if I can fly.
How does this cowboy thing work anyway? If I formerly call him out to duel, does he have the option to decline and still save face? Surely that would be an unrecoverable hypocrisy after all his talk. Anyone?
-
Addendum:
Icepac, stop PMing me you distasteful little coward. I do not care to meet you in person, and if I did I assure you it would go as well for you as arguing with me on this forum would.
-
Once again, replies segmented for Skuzzy's convenience. Although to the best of my interpretation I am not now breaking forum rules. Only Cowboy ones apparently :banana:
-
Hey, you want to hear my theory about YOU? :D
I believe you are none other than Ron Higgens professional Cardinal Richelieu impersonator, and that you
have expanded your repertoire to include: "Virtual Pilot." :rofl :rofl :rofl
Im soo glad Inspector Dim rolled in and exposed you, because you certainly took me in.
-
And for the third time evading my invitation to explore what this thread was about in the first place: flying, while continuing to run his mouth. EXACTLY my motivation for criticising Caldera in the first place. I think I’ve finally figured out this cowboy-based, swaggering code of honour which you, Caldera and Icepac cling to under the illusion that it is strength: expedience. Whatever expedient straw you can grasp to get your illusion of ‘win’. An ego so necessary that it precludes the humility to learn from the negative things life throw in your path.
You with no counterargument, no reason, no logic. Just a skipping from one unfounded assumption to another with a hate-based teeth-gnashing resentment of what you consider an unfounded attack on an innocent player.
Caldera, who is presently hiding under a rock, peeking out to see if it’s safe to post another humorous appeal-to-the-masses-for-support meme under the illusion he has no need to answer the criticism he brought upon himself.
And Ipecac, who seems to believe PMs are a safe conduit for his own impotent variety of knuckle-dragging ‘let’s meet in person’ intimidation, protected by some illusion of a right to privacy.
Ironic that this thread has mirrored Caldera’s fight with Ahiru. You have nothing to counter my issues, have stumbled from assumption to insult to derision and implications of lack of manliness or sanity and then this last grasp at humour, all the while being driven to the deck, drained of energy and with no options left, bending over for a bunch of red hot Ho-5 rounds up the arse.
And the final irony: I do not care who wins this argument anymore than I care who wins an ACM bout. All these things, including this thread are an opportunity to learn. Learn about others and oneself. I have certainly done that here. I got stronger through this interaction while you got weaker.
The value of further discussion has clearly long passed. Someone else posted in this thread, someone who might think differences in opinion cannot co-exist with respect. This is untrue. His understanding of you arrived earlier than mine:
“Just kill them all shida, it is the only language some of these guys understand”.
:salute
-
I couldn't torture myself and watch the entire 18 minutes of the film. The first few minutes was more than enough to come to the conclusion that it was actually a poor example of flying on both parties.
Ahiru could have been more aggressive in his BnZ passes but he's not that aggressive of a pilot in 1v1 situations, and Caldera could have also been more aggressive in his break turns to force the over shoot on each of Ahiru's passes but he wasn't. Caldera would instead of using a Low Yo-Yo to break into Ahiru's attack and force the reversal on the overshoot, he'd Split-S instead for absolutely no positive benefits for doing so.
Ahiru, after the first few passes, should have recognized that his non-aggressive BnZ passes weren't working and Caldera's tactic was to try to force the overshoot. Upon seeing and recognizing this, Ahiru should have gone into a lag pursuit and used lag turns (to avoid overshooting Caldera) to set himself in position to blast Caldera out of the sky when Caldera maneuvered to force the overshoot.
Why were Ahiru's BnZ passes not aggressive? He never pressed his advantage nor set himself at proper angles to compensate for Caldera's break turns or Split-S for a shot, nor did he do the most important thing a BnZ pass is supposed to do. The main object of Boom and Zoom is to force your opponent to bleed away his energy by making him break to avoid the attack, thus rendering him a slow and lumbering target, Ahiru failed to do so, otherwise the fight would have only lasted a few minutes instead of a tortuous 18 minutes.
As I mentioned earlier, Caldera could have been more aggressive on the overshoot attempts. He was also very sloppy in his break turns and wasted energy needlessly floundering around when his turns and movements should have been smooth to avoid any unnecessary energy loss. Caldera should have used more Low Yo-Yo's and instead of just breaking to avoid Ahiru's attack, should have broke into them for a better chance of forcing the overshoot and reversal. When he did a Split-S, that was a bad mistake because of the needless loss of altitude and the energy he gained was rendered rather useless since he had to use whatever energy he gained to regain some measure of altitude he lost, potentially setting himself up for an easy shot on Ahiru's part (if he was more aggressive in his attacks). Caldera should have used a Low Yo-Yo to break into Ahiru's attack, pulling just enough Gs to avoid wasting whatever energy gained in the maneuver, this would have allowed Caldera to either potentially follow Ahiru into the vertical after his BnZ pass or left Caldera enough energy to regain the altitude lost (and maybe gain a few extra feet) during the breaking turn without leaving himself as a potential target.
-
Interesting analysis, thanks. I thought he should have won in short order. When he finally slowed down, that's what happened. At low speed, the 202 is no match for the 84.
-
WOW, a proper analogy. you see Nrshida. this is how you respond.
-
WOW, a proper analogy.
Analysis. An analogy is a drawn parallel between two dissimilar things.
Trust me, according to the conclusion he's drawn, the only useful thing Ack-Ack's post did for Caldera is let him pretend for a minute this was really about Help & Training all along.
-
Give it a rest.
-
Analysis. An analogy is a drawn parallel between two dissimilar things.
Trust me, according to the conclusion he's drawn, the only useful thing Ack-Ack's post did for Caldera is let him pretend for a minute this was really about Help & Training all along.
but then, what im I thinking..you're not a pilot, so you CANT respond like that.