General Forums => The O' Club => Topic started by: 1Cane on August 22, 2023, 02:19:43 PM
Title: World Economic Forum
Post by: 1Cane on August 22, 2023, 02:19:43 PM
W.E.F. has put forth a treaty to ban dairy products, meat, private vehicles, limiting air travel and three new garments per year by 2030! Fourteen American cities have signed on they are Austin, Boston, Chicago, DC. New Orleans, Los Angeles, San Francisco ,Seattle ,New York, Philadelphia ,Houston ,Miami ,Portland all of these cities are controlled by the same party I don't remember getting a chance to vote on this. I have no plans to substitute insects for meat. This looks like a suicide plan to me. It's live the EV cars, power grid and charging stations are not adequate. :old:
Title: Re: World Economic Forum
Post by: Spikes on August 22, 2023, 02:23:39 PM
in
Title: Re: World Economic Forum
Post by: nrshida on August 22, 2023, 02:24:58 PM
It's for your own good! :old: :banana:
Title: Re: World Economic Forum
Post by: DmonSlyr on August 22, 2023, 02:55:26 PM
Poor Hitech just can't catch a break from the thread closures lol.
Unfortunately Cane, this is beating a dead horse and people still don't get it no matter how hard you try to show them who the real lunatics are. There should be no need to argue or debate about "muh conspiracy theories", when they come out and tell you everything they want to do.
IN
Title: Re: World Economic Forum
Post by: guncrasher on August 22, 2023, 02:58:00 PM
me thinks you have never been to Los Angeles, lots of places serve insects.
as for getting rid of meat, bologna, they would have a real revolution. a day without carne asada, it's like a day without sunshine.
stop posting bs.
semp
Title: Re: World Economic Forum
Post by: 1Cane on August 22, 2023, 04:09:22 PM
me thinks you have never been to Los Angeles, lots of places serve insects.
as for getting rid of meat, bologna, they would have a real revolution. a day without carne asada, it's like a day without sunshine. answer// I have lived in San Bernardino county last 53 years and have never ordered an insect dish, Big difference in wanting to eat insects and being told to eat them. 9-6-22 Dutch town of Haarlan bans meat 4-17-23 Mayor Adams of New York vows to cut meat emissons 33% https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/sep/06/haarlem-netherlands-bans-meat-adverts-public-spaces-climate-crisis Fort Hood Texas May-June 1967 "Viet Nam not much of a war but only one we got"//
semp
Title: Re: World Economic Forum
Post by: GasTeddy on August 22, 2023, 04:28:10 PM
Wouldn't it be much more effective to forbid eating? That way we would reduce many harmful things.
Title: Re: World Economic Forum
Post by: CptTrips on August 22, 2023, 04:35:14 PM
The link you posted said they banned meat adverts not meat.
I love shrimp, but I dare anyone to tell me that isn't really just an underwater insect.
I want to try those grasshopper tacos. They are actually supposed to be good.
Title: Re: World Economic Forum
Post by: Busher on August 22, 2023, 04:35:29 PM
W.E.F. has put forth a treaty to ban dairy products, meat, private vehicles, limiting air travel and three new garments per year by 2030! Fourteen American cities have signed on they are Austin, Boston, Chicago, DC. New Orleans, Los Angeles, San Francisco ,Seattle ,New York, Philadelphia ,Houston ,Miami ,Portland all of these cities are controlled by the same party I don't remember getting a chance to vote on this. I have no plans to substitute insects for meat. This looks like a suicide plan to me. It's live the EV cars, power grid and charging stations are not adequate. :old:
Living your own life in peace seems not to be in the cards.
Title: Re: World Economic Forum
Post by: Shuffler on August 22, 2023, 04:43:33 PM
I would give each one of them a bullit which they could use to end their devestation on our planet. My contribution to cleaning the earth.
Title: Re: World Economic Forum
Post by: Brooke on August 22, 2023, 04:52:08 PM
Don't worry, 1Cane. They aren't proposing to "force" people into zero meat by 2030. They are proposing "food-related consumption interventions". See how nice that sounds? (Section 6.4.1, Table 3 of this:) https://expose-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/Arup-C40-The-Future-of-Urban-Consumption-in-a-1-5C-World.pdf
They also want you to: -- Live in a pod -- Own nothing -- Eat the bugs -- Be happy
It sounds so great! If only they could implement those "interventions" now, it would reverse population flight out of those fine cities, I'm sure.
Title: Re: World Economic Forum
Post by: CptTrips on August 22, 2023, 04:59:05 PM
Poor Hitech just can't catch a break from the thread closures lol.
Unfortunately Cane, this is beating a dead horse and people still don't get it no matter how hard you try to show them who the real lunatics are. There should be no need to argue or debate about "muh conspiracy theories", when they come out and tell you everything they want to do.
IN
Title: Re: World Economic Forum
Post by: Eagler on August 22, 2023, 05:22:49 PM
Good thing true peace and happiness comes from within
Eagler
Title: Re: World Economic Forum
Post by: Vulcan on August 22, 2023, 05:28:32 PM
Always thought a spelling test might be a good precursor to exercising one's 2nd amendment rights. :rolleyes:
No problem as long as the same test could be used in determining one's right to vote. At the very least it would save the DNC a lot of money and manpower as there would be far less votes to harvest.
Title: Re: World Economic Forum
Post by: knorB on August 22, 2023, 07:11:36 PM
Always thought a spelling test might be a good precursor to exercising one's 2nd amendment rights. :rolleyes:
God given, fascist.
Title: Re: World Economic Forum
Post by: Meatwad on August 22, 2023, 07:22:06 PM
Id like to see that in order to be a registered voter, you must prove you are a US citizen. No citizenship = no vote. But then where would the "magical mystery ballots" come from at the last minutes? :headscratch:
Title: Re: World Economic Forum
Post by: DmonSlyr on August 22, 2023, 07:33:13 PM
NVM, what does it even matter on this forum...
Another thread ripe for the cull :devil
Title: Re: World Economic Forum
Post by: Busher on August 22, 2023, 09:20:38 PM
God given? Seriously? God's name is really Jimmy Madison? :rolleyes:
Title: Re: World Economic Forum
Post by: guncrasher on August 22, 2023, 09:23:31 PM
let me get this straight. los angeles is going to banned meat and all the people that love mexican food will give it up for insects. cool, what is to stop them from driving 30 minutes to another city that sells meat. :uhoh :uhoh :uhoh
what most people dont know is what we call los angeles is actually about 60 something cities. like cane himself said, he lives in san bernardino county, that could be from 100 miles to 20 or 30 miles from los angeles. so he said he didnt vote for it, he dont have to, he doesnt live close to los angeles.
but back on point, you really think all those people will willingly give up mexican food, or salvadoran or name any other country? they will just ignore it and if forced, vote the people out.
this is one really stupid conspiracy theory. coming from somebody who doesnt know that san Bernardino County is not close to the city of los angeles.
misspelting are on purpose.
semp
Title: Re: World Economic Forum
Post by: nrshida on August 23, 2023, 12:34:24 AM
you really think all those people will willingly give up
Willingly?
Here are the common tools: -- Higher taxes (to account for the environmental, health, and societal harm it does). -- Higher regulation on farms or processing plants (with regard to emissions, effluents, safety of product, humane treatment of animals, disposal, allowed feed, allowed quantity of feed, allowed land, allowed arrangement of buildings and sizes, need for reams of permits that cost a lot and take forever to get, and whatever else can be thought up). -- Higher regulation on transport. -- Increase law suits (over any perceived violations, driving up cost of insurance and risk of being in that business). -- Constant propaganda (in papers, studies talking about how bad for you meat is, and how bad for the world it is, have teachers teach kids constantly how bad it is for them and the world). -- Maybe make some of it illegal. No animals under a certain age. Make some cuts of meat illegal, like t-bones (because of mad cow) or babybacks (because of age). -- Maybe have rules on how and where it can be displayed so as not to offend particular religious groups, or vegitarians, as that is not inclusive. -- Maybe mandate that a certain percentage of meat sold (in stores, or in fast food, or other restaurants) has to be synthetic or insect-based. Ramp up that percentage over time. Or it's not mandatory, but if your restaurant chain doesn't do it, it pays much higher taxes (for the impact to health and environment), and/or places that comply get pay offs (i.e., tax breaks). -- Maybe outright price regulation at some point, or quotas.
You can start out small, but keep at it diligently, and ramp it up over a longer time span.
Fear not. Cricket tacos can be in your California future.
Title: Re: World Economic Forum
Post by: Eagler on August 23, 2023, 06:21:28 AM
No problem as long as the same test could be used in determining one's right to vote. At the very least it would save the DNC a lot of money and manpower as there would be far less votes to harvest.
Odd how the videos of those doing the harvesting have disappeared from YT...there were many showing their dashes filled with purchased ballots..zuck bucks provided the unsupervised drop boxes
I did like the clip of his lawyer being charged in GA stating "Absolutely " when asked if he thought it was stolen..
Eagler
Title: Re: World Economic Forum
Post by: Shuffler on August 23, 2023, 07:33:34 AM
I would give each one of them a bullit which they could use to end their devestation on our planet. My contribution to cleaning the earth.
That generally is a cure for that particular type of narcissistic sociopaths.
C.S. Lewis: “Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end for they do so with the approval of their own conscience. They may be more likely to go to Heaven yet at the same time likelier to make a Hell of earth. This very kindness stings with intolerable insult. To be "cured" against one's will and cured of states which we may not regard as disease is to be put on a level of those who have not yet reached the age of reason or those who never will; to be classed with infants, imbeciles, and domestic animals.”
Title: Re: World Economic Forum
Post by: Captain Virgil Hilts on August 23, 2023, 07:40:03 AM
God given? Seriously? God's name is really Jimmy Madison? :rolleyes:
No. But Madison deferred to The Creator, and that subject, and most others. So did Jefferson, Washington, Franklin, Paine, Hamilton, Adams, and the vast majority of the rest.
Title: Re: World Economic Forum
Post by: Captain Virgil Hilts on August 23, 2023, 07:42:19 AM
Here are the common tools: -- Higher taxes (to account for the environmental, health, and societal harm it does). -- Higher regulation on farms or processing plants (with regard to emissions, effluents, safety of product, humane treatment of animals, disposal, allowed feed, allowed quantity of feed, allowed land, allowed arrangement of buildings and sizes, need for reams of permits that cost a lot and take forever to get, and whatever else can be thought up). -- Higher regulation on transport. -- Increase law suits (over any perceived violations, driving up cost of insurance and risk of being in that business). -- Constant propaganda (in papers, studies talking about how bad for you meat is, and how bad for the world it is, have teachers teach kids constantly how bad it is for them and the world). -- Maybe make some of it illegal. No animals under a certain age. Make some cuts of meat illegal, like t-bones (because of mad cow) or babybacks (because of age). -- Maybe have rules on how and where it can be displayed so as not to offend particular religious groups, or vegitarians, as that is not inclusive. -- Maybe mandate that a certain percentage of meat sold (in stores, or in fast food, or other restaurants) has to be synthetic or insect-based. Ramp up that percentage over time. Or it's not mandatory, but if your restaurant chain doesn't do it, it pays much higher taxes (for the impact to health and environment), and/or places that comply get pay offs (i.e., tax breaks). -- Maybe outright price regulation at some point, or quotas.
You can start out small, but keep at it diligently, and ramp it up over a longer time span.
Fear not. Cricket tacos can be in your California future.
Incrementally.
Just as we were warned.
Title: Re: World Economic Forum
Post by: DmonSlyr on August 23, 2023, 08:01:44 AM
They'll never get it. Not sure whether on purpose or by sheer ignorance. It's just like how they cheer throwing a former president and #1 republican candidate in jail in an unprecedented action, giving their leaders a pass while turning around and continuing to call us the fascist... they will never understand the implications of this and how it might affect the future of freedom in America.
They would rather side with guys like Klous Schwab who believe in a world government, controlled by "elites" of their choosing, and call it a "democracy", that is unconstitutional in every way. And trying to change our culture and world into one culture for the entire world. And making everything we enjoy harder and harder to attain. All you can do is hope that more people wake up to this insanity.
Title: Re: World Economic Forum
Post by: knorB on August 23, 2023, 08:12:01 AM
No. But Madison deferred to The Creator, and that subject, and most others. So did Jefferson, Washington, Franklin, Paine, Hamilton, Adams, and the vast majority of the rest.
Shhh, he was pontificating.
See what I did there?
Title: Re: World Economic Forum
Post by: knorB on August 23, 2023, 08:14:32 AM
Here are the common tools: -- Higher taxes (to account for the environmental, health, and societal harm it does). -- Higher regulation on farms or processing plants (with regard to emissions, effluents, safety of product, humane treatment of animals, disposal, allowed feed, allowed quantity of feed, allowed land, allowed arrangement of buildings and sizes, need for reams of permits that cost a lot and take forever to get, and whatever else can be thought up). -- Higher regulation on transport. -- Increase law suits (over any perceived violations, driving up cost of insurance and risk of being in that business). -- Constant propaganda (in papers, studies talking about how bad for you meat is, and how bad for the world it is, have teachers teach kids constantly how bad it is for them and the world). -- Maybe make some of it illegal. No animals under a certain age. Make some cuts of meat illegal, like t-bones (because of mad cow) or babybacks (because of age). -- Maybe have rules on how and where it can be displayed so as not to offend particular religious groups, or vegitarians, as that is not inclusive. -- Maybe mandate that a certain percentage of meat sold (in stores, or in fast food, or other restaurants) has to be synthetic or insect-based. Ramp up that percentage over time. Or it's not mandatory, but if your restaurant chain doesn't do it, it pays much higher taxes (for the impact to health and environment), and/or places that comply get pay offs (i.e., tax breaks). -- Maybe outright price regulation at some point, or quotas.
You can start out small, but keep at it diligently, and ramp it up over a longer time span.
Fear not. Cricket tacos can be in your California future.
Wait till you soon see the price of bacon increase due to CA ridiculous regulations.
The link you posted said they banned meat adverts not meat.
I love shrimp, but I dare anyone to tell me that isn't really just an underwater insect.
I want to try those grasshopper tacos. They are actually supposed to be good.
no, shrimp and lobsters are not related to insects. They are both crustaceans, which are a different group of arthropods than insects. Arthropods are animals that have jointed legs, segmented bodies, and hard exoskeletons. Insects and crustaceans are both arthropods, but they have different characteristics that distinguish them from each other. Some of these differences are:
Body segmentation: Insects have three body segments: head, thorax, and abdomen. Crustaceans have two body segments: cephalothorax (fused head and thorax) and abdomen. Number and shape of legs: Insects have six legs arranged in three pairs. Crustaceans have more than six legs, usually ten pairs of appendages. Their legs are biramous, meaning they are branched into two parts. Adaptation to land habitat: Insects are the most successful arthropods on land, living in almost every habitat. Crustaceans are mostly aquatic, living in marine or freshwater environments. Only a few crustaceans live on land, such as woodlice and hermit crabs. Larval stages: Insects have four stages of development: egg, larva, pupa, and adult. Crustaceans have three stages of development: egg, nauplius, and adult. The nauplius is a larval stage that is unique to crustaceans.
Title: Re: World Economic Forum
Post by: 1Cane on August 23, 2023, 10:01:20 AM
Semp is right I live outside of LA city limits so couldn't vote on it. Neither did the citizens of LA since they are being ruled by fiat from the WEF. :banana: :banana: https://ground.news/article/these-14-american-cities-have-a-target-of-banning-meat-dairy-and-private-vehicles-by-2030
Just more BS
Title: Re: World Economic Forum
Post by: guncrasher on August 23, 2023, 10:39:29 AM
Semp is right I live outside of LA city limits so couldn't vote on it. Neither did the citizens of LA since they are being ruled by fiat from the WEF. :banana: :banana: https://ground.news/article/these-14-american-cities-have-a-target-of-banning-meat-dairy-and-private-vehicles-by-2030
Just more BS
show me the city code that says that.
:banana: :banana: :banana: dance baby
semp
Title: Re: World Economic Forum
Post by: Busher on August 23, 2023, 11:28:20 AM
Semp is right I live outside of LA city limits so couldn't vote on it. Neither did the citizens of LA since they are being ruled by fiat from the WEF. :banana: :banana: https://ground.news/article/these-14-american-cities-have-a-target-of-banning-meat-dairy-and-private-vehicles-by-2030
Just more BS
I can see "GroundNews" being awarded a Pulitzer Prize for this level of journalism :rolleyes:
Title: Re: World Economic Forum
Post by: GasTeddy on August 23, 2023, 02:22:22 PM
The Official Truth (https://www.vintag.es/2021/07/vintage-meat-ads.html) has tendency to change during the years.
(https://youtu.be/tMVE2MaLe8I)
Title: Re: World Economic Forum
Post by: -gg- on August 23, 2023, 02:57:10 PM
For those that think it's fake news, all you have to do is a TINY bit of research
This is not al elected organization, but cities (mayors) from around the world belong to this organization and they meet and organize plans to implement things they think the world needs.
You can go right to their website and see exactly what and whop they are. It's real. Real money and real governments are behind it and funding it.
All it takes is to open your eyes to what actually goes on in this world, and you will get an idea of what's coming. You don't think they can make things happen, even outside of laws?
https://www.c40.org/about-c40/
Look at the corporations listed too.
https://www.c40.org/cities/
Title: Re: World Economic Forum
Post by: knorB on August 23, 2023, 03:06:56 PM
For those that think it's fake news, all you have to do is a TINY bit of research
This is not al elected organization, but cities (mayors) from around the world belong to this organization and they meet and organize plans to implement things they think the world needs.
You can go right to their website and see exactly what and whop they are. It's real. Real money and real governments are behind it and funding it.
All it takes is to open your eyes to what actually goes on in this world, and you will get an idea of what's coming. You don't think they can make things happen, even outside of laws?
https://www.c40.org/about-c40/
Look at the corporations listed too.
https://www.c40.org/cities/
where does it say they want to get rid of meat.
semp
Title: Re: World Economic Forum
Post by: -gg- on August 23, 2023, 04:04:05 PM
They want it limit meat. And these people are not elected officials. They will further their goals however they can.
They want to limit meat. Here the link. They want to make people eat "healthy" in the name of climate change. Read their webisite
They think we waste to much by having private cars, too many fashion choices, too much meat.
Their whole goal is to screw all of us in order to save the planit
You'd have to be a real idiot to not see where stuff like this has been going and where it will eventually end up. Little by little, people like you (sheep) will alllow all of this to become reality
No private cars, eating bugs and living in "15 minute" cities
They want it limit meat. And these people are not elected officials. They will further their goals however they can.
They want to limit meat. Here the link. They want to make people eat "healthy" in the name of climate change. Read their webisite
They think we waste to much by having private cars, too many fashion choices, too much meat.
Their whole goal is to screw all of us in order to save the planit
You'd have to be a real idiot to not see where stuff like this has been going and where it will eventually end up. Little by little, people like you (sheep) will alllow all of this to become reality
No private cars, eating bugs and living in "15 minute" cities
Research released by C40 Cities in June 2019, revealed that food is amongst the biggest sources of consumption-based emissions from cities. Eating a sustainable diet and avoiding food waste could cut greenhouse gas emissions from the food we eat by more than 60%. Research by The EAT-Lancet Commission released in January 2019 found that if adopted universally, the ‘Planetary Health Diet’ would dramatically reduce emissions, provide a balanced, nutritional diet for 10 billion people, and save 11 million lives each year. The planetary health diet is comprised of balanced and nutritious food providing up to 2,500 calories a day for all adults, not to exceed 16kg of meat per person per year or ~300g per week, and 90kg of dairy per person per year or ~250g per day, and low in ultra-processed food. A planetary health plate should consist of approximately half a plate of vegetables and fruits; the other half should consist of primarily whole grains, plant protein sources, unsaturated plant oils, and (optionally) modest amounts of animal sources of protein.
Under the C40 Good Food Cities Declaration, cities commit to:
Align food procurement policies to the Planetary Health Diet ideally sourced from organic agriculture
Title: Re: World Economic Forum
Post by: -gg- on August 23, 2023, 04:24:31 PM
The global food system is a major driver of harmful greenhouse gas emissions, responsible for around a quarter of all emissions which are driving the global climate emergency. Without substantial changes to the ways in which we produce, transport, consume, and dispose of food, C40’s research shows that emissions from the food sector are set to increase by nearly 40% by 2050. As emissions grow from producing, consuming and disposing of food, the accelerating climate crisis threatens our ability to feed the world’s growing population. Currently, more than 820 million people around the world suffer from hunger. At the same time, global diet trends also contribute to increased rates of heart disease, diabetes, and cancer; rising healthcare costs; and millions of premature deaths each year. The overconsumption of red meat, a major driver of greenhouse gas emissions, and ultra-processed foods heavy in sugar, fat, and salt are making our communities sicker and less productive.
Title: Re: World Economic Forum
Post by: knorB on August 23, 2023, 04:31:02 PM
If you bothered to actually look... "GroundNews" is nothing but a News Aggregator. Do continue to be a pompous arse.
Gladly. The best comedians make great skits out of these endless ridiculous conspiracy theories. And of course I am a card carrying member of the "radical left".
Title: Re: World Economic Forum
Post by: knorB on August 23, 2023, 04:42:55 PM
Gladly. The best comedians make great skits out of these endless ridiculous conspiracy theories. And of course I am a card carrying member of the "radical left".
Admission is the first step to recovery. Good job.
Title: Re: World Economic Forum
Post by: DmonSlyr on August 23, 2023, 05:12:21 PM
Gladly. The best comedians make great skits out of these endless ridiculous conspiracy theories. And of course I am a card carrying member of the "radical left".
Please explain to me where the "conspiracy theory" part of this is?
https://sdgs.un.org/2030agenda
Everytime they say "2030" this is what they are referencing. Why would you remain ignorant to this?
Title: Re: World Economic Forum
Post by: -gg- on August 23, 2023, 05:21:29 PM
The global food system is a major contributor to global warming. It also happens to be feeding us!
Lol.
The cure is worse than the disease. There's no harm in global warming other than what these maniacs are proposing.
Title: Re: World Economic Forum
Post by: -gg- on August 23, 2023, 05:29:08 PM
The stuff that these people are putting on their website and out to the public is only what they want the public to see. But you can see that their main goal is to reduce harmful emissions, according to them. Their goal isn't to make you healthier or to make food less expensive for you. They couldn't care less about you. In fact, a lot of these people have been pushing for population reduction..
You've got a be acomplete ignoramus to think The wheels aren't turning and it's not going to be good for you.
But go ahead and keep your head in the sand guys.
Title: Re: World Economic Forum
Post by: Busher on August 23, 2023, 06:54:19 PM
Please explain to me where the "conspiracy theory" part of this is?
https://sdgs.un.org/2030agenda
Everytime they say "2030" this is what they are referencing. Why would you remain ignorant to this?
I see nothing in this agenda beyond the desire to improve this world for everyone. The joke comes from believing George Soros is hiding behind this with an evil plan to take over.
Title: Re: World Economic Forum
Post by: RUSH1 on August 23, 2023, 06:54:43 PM
The stuff that these people are putting on their website and out to the public is only what they want the public to see. But you can see that their main goal is to reduce harmful emissions, according to them. Their goal isn't to make you healthier or to make food less expensive for you. They couldn't care less about you. In fact, a lot of these people have been pushing for population reduction..
You've got a be acomplete ignoramus to think The wheels aren't turning and it's not going to be good for you.
But go ahead and keep your head in the sand guys.
The full interview.
Title: Re: World Economic Forum
Post by: RUSH1 on August 23, 2023, 06:59:40 PM
I see nothing in this agenda beyond the desire to improve this world for everyone. The joke comes from believing George Soros is hiding behind this with an evil plan to take over.
So, you admit that there is an agenda and that they know what is best for you? Textbook.