Author Topic: The honorable Ted Kennedy (Read 3578 times)

Arlo · « **Reply #180 on:** January 30, 2008, 09:02:26 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by john9001
arlo, you said cars are registered and they can't take your car, i proved they can.

you lose.

You may wanna hold off with your effort to rush to embarrass yourself publically by such a claim.

You said registration is the first step in elimination and infer that such is an inevitability.

Have they come to take your car away because you registered it?

No?

Try less "twit" in your arguments.

Chairboy · « **Reply #181 on:** January 30, 2008, 09:06:15 PM »

Don't be silly, Arlo, nobody is saying they take X away because you register it. They take X away for any number of reasons, but they KNOW where the registered Xs are and can get them. Registered guns were confiscated immedietely before Kristallnacht in germany, for instance, 'bout 70 years ago. Do you recall the aftermath?

Bronk · « **Reply #182 on:** January 30, 2008, 09:10:34 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Arlo
Covered this already. No Nazis in power here .... as of yet. Have "they" come to take you car away? How many guns of yours have been confiscated to date? Not seein' the threat remotely close ... but keep a vigilant eye. You can be the canary for the rest of us.

Nazis not in power in England... took guns away there.
Nazis not in power in Australia.... took them away there also.

I'm not saying it will happen here but to say nazis are needed for such to happen....
I think not.

Arlo · « **Reply #183 on:** January 30, 2008, 09:11:17 PM »

This ain't Germany. The Nazis aren't in power. Nothing's been passed to outlaw possession of guns (in general). Sky still appears firmly in place. I'm all for diligence, skepticism (even a degree of fear). Just seein' some overblow here.

Arlo · « **Reply #184 on:** January 30, 2008, 09:12:08 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Bronk
Nazis not in power in England... took guns away there.
Nazis not in power in Australia.... took them away there also.

Not saying it will happen here but saying nazis are needed for such to happen....
I think not.

Sure. But casting Democrats (in general) in the role? Hyperbolic blow.

SD67 · « **Reply #185 on:** January 30, 2008, 09:19:39 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Bronk
Nazis not in power in Australia.... took them away there also.

That's a matter of opinion.

WWhiskey · « **Reply #186 on:** January 30, 2008, 09:33:03 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Yeager
Osama is all for Universal Healthcare. Free Healthcare for every American. Sounds good to me. While we are at it lets provide a job with free housing, free transportation, and free food clothing and energy since we appear to need that to survive.

healthcare is not free, someone must pay the doctors, the hospital, the drug company's! who will pay? and why should some pay if others get it for free?the rich? why would i want too be rich and have to work too pay for everyone else if i could stop working and get it all for free? are you gonna make me work too pay for your healthcare?
doesn't sound like a very good deal too me!

Bronk · « **Reply #187 on:** January 30, 2008, 09:45:14 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by SD67
That's a matter of opinion.

I know you're being sarcastic, but the term "Nazi" is used all to lightly IMHO.

john9001 · « **Reply #188 on:** January 30, 2008, 09:49:05 PM »

i agree, the term nazi is over used, we should use the proper term, fascist socialism.

Yknurd · « **Reply #189 on:** January 30, 2008, 10:26:18 PM »

I say again, the only thing keeping the King of England out of my living room is my gun!

*looks left, looks right*

See, ain't no King of England here!

Chairboy · « **Reply #190 on:** January 30, 2008, 10:30:25 PM »

I don't need no smoke detector, my house ain't on fire.

Arlo · « **Reply #191 on:** January 30, 2008, 10:46:10 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by john9001
i agree, the term nazi is over used, we should use the proper term, fascist socialism.

You're arguing semantics and critisizing the use of one version describing the same historical group when it was basically your correlation to start with? Well that's neat.