Originally posted by Skuzzy
If you are getting better performance with Vista, than with XP, it is only due to you having a poor installation of XP. There is absolutely no way Vista can outperform XP.
This is a common misunderstanding. Most people have trashed installations of XP and most do not even know it. This is simply due to the ludicrous installation options MS defaulted XP to, which over time gauranteed XP to run very poorly.
Vista, by its very design, cannot run faster than XP on the same hardware, even if more RAM is installed.
I dunno, I guess thats why you make the big bucks LOL, I wouldn't know a good install from a bad install as long as it works. And xp worked, so I never questioned it, the only thing I hated about xp that I like about vista is the recovery disk is a actual disk and not some stupid 2 disk image set
But as long as it works I guess I'll keep it. This thing is like a million times faster than my old computer anyway.