Ordnance changes in 1.05

[TheWobble]

putting in the basic principals of falling objsects would fix ALL of the problems EVERYONE has with bombers being too accurate, the way it is now is just plain....well stupid, not to be rude but that is the best descriptive.

[Sorrow[S=A]]

BTW Pyro- was there any chance of seeing the 9UT or 9T show up?

[Westy]

 Wobble, you're talking out of your rear end.

(.squelch Wobble)

        -Westy

[TheWobble]

yes and when the words come out of my rear end they will fall in a perfectly straight line no matter how high up i am,

[brady]

  Il-2: when I stood under the nose of the Il-2 at the Paul E Garber facility, the first thing that I noticed or rather stood awestruck by was that" Oh My God It's All Armor!!!" the whole freaking front end of the plane is an armored shell, the cowling is Not aluminum it is STEAL thick armor!, it is one thing to read about it and another to have your "PAW" on that steal and think to your self I see why Hartman said " I aim for the oil Coollier on the bottom of the plane" because anything else would be a waste of time , and the wing is huge!
  It would be great to have this plane in AH.

  Oh and what about a Do 217 and a Fritz X?
   we would have to steer it to the target


        Brady

[Ogre]

Zigrat wrote:
 

theres some guy who did detailed analysis of this on a webpage but i dont remember where the page is, prolly do a search for dispersion

Dunno if I am the guy, but I did an analysis a couple of years back on this subject:
 http://www.cris.com/~reaper/

go to the "Gunnery" link

It could probably do with some "freshing up", the gunnery tool I created for that study has been improved some, but the results will still be very close.

-Ogre

[Fishu]

Wmaker already mentioned those 1000kg bombs for Ju-88 A-4


I'd like to have those also and possible MG-FF

I can go find the book of FAF JU-88's from the library during this week, if this flu doesn't get any worse and scan those pictures.
Theres one with MG-FF and it does have bombsight also, it was brought from germany as it is.
Then theres pictures of 1000kg bombs placed in inner racks (those are big!).

[Wmaker]

Hi...again Pyro  

There has been discussion about LW-aircraft's jabo-capability in AH...Giving Bf109G-6 and G-2 ETC 50 VIId bombrack option (Rüstsatz 2) with 4x50kg bombs would give
"more than one egg"-capability for the 109s. Bf109F-4 with 4x50kg configuration was known as F-4/B.
   
   I'd also like to see MW-50 and GM-1 being implemented to the 109G-6. It might be hard to get both of them because it might require change in loadout option menu. So if I'd have to choose between these two systems MW 50 would be more viable in MA conditions. Also, does the Bf109F-4 modeled in AH have GM-1? I haven't flown it much.

   I know these wouldn't be a total fix for this Jabo problem and wouldn't take away the need for FW-190F-8 but it would make it possible to kill more than a panzer per
flight in these 109s.


   1Wmaker1
   Lentolaivue 34