First you defend your "necro-bump" as a "sarcastic" post, then you defend your post by trashing TC. Dude, pick one sinking boat and just go down with it 
I'm not trashing TC nor do I wish to. It'd be nice if he showed a mutual consideration (rather than assaulting my character as he did). He made specific charges - that I used profanity - I didn't - That I was adolescent (character attack) for wanting more faster - I disagree and so does at least one other - that asking for more was as named - if it is, TC is guilty too. I'm playing the ball, not the man - which is more than TC's post can claim. I make no comment regarding the nature of TC. I make plenty of comment about the nature of the post as hyperbolic and an attempt to pile on - and asked a simple question.
As for the other sinking ship, my rules of business were expressly sarcastic. Do you honestly believe that the current rules of business are as posited - or that I, as corp staff in a company that lives or dies by those rules - would? You don't succeed by treating the customer as a moron - even though, in this case (and this was the allusion) the inital poster might well be?
TC's post was classic ad hominem and deserves response as such - indeed, probably is closer to a rule violation than mine.
