Author Topic: Cold War - Hot War  (Read 937 times)

Offline artik

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1908
      • Blog
Cold War - Hot War
« Reply #15 on: May 15, 2004, 05:22:22 AM »
Anyway it is what if setup.......
So most important there is ballance.....

I do not see that usage of strategic bombers will give to USAF/RAF big advantage. Because they are not really usefull in CT. So if there will not be buffs for VVS I don't think it will change a lot....
Actually it would be even interesting because strategic aviation wasn't developed in VVS when tactic bomber aviation had one of the best strike planes of WW2 Il-2. It is great bomber to destroy any tactical target like field because of its good armor. Of corse it needs cover - as any strategic bomber formations of WW2.

Actually Il-2 is much more suitable as tactical bomber/attacker for CT then strategic bombers like B-17 and Lancasters.
Artik, 101 "Red" Squadron, Israel

Offline TrueKill

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1864
Cold War - Hot War
« Reply #16 on: May 15, 2004, 05:24:28 AM »
yea bomers do make it uneven cuz when u wanna take a base theres no bomber to take out town,hagers,ect.

Offline Rafe35

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1426
Cold War - Hot War
« Reply #17 on: May 15, 2004, 05:31:52 PM »
Artik,

I gotta say that USAF did not come until President Truman signed the legislation that established a new defense organization for the nation in July 26, 1947 and independent Air Force into being.

So just stick with USAAC/USAAF :aok

Rafe
Rafe35
Former member of VF-17 "Jolly Rogers"

Offline Slash27

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 12795
Cold War - Hot War
« Reply #18 on: May 15, 2004, 08:20:28 PM »
By this time period the clever and resourceful soviets had copied (down to the last rivet) the B29.


Stalin wanted it to be so exact in every detail they even copied a repair patch on one of the wings.

Offline DiabloTX

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9592
Cold War - Hot War
« Reply #19 on: May 15, 2004, 10:39:14 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by storch
By this time period the clever and resourceful soviets had copied (down to the last rivet) the B29.  hailing themselves as technologically superior to the west they fielded the great Tu-4.

The great Yak-3 was also available as well.
Quote
...and it was not until 1949 that the TU-4 became fully operational with some 300 in service.


From:
http://b-29s-over-korea.com/shortstories/russianclone.htm
"There ain't no revolution, only evolution, but every time I'm in Denmark I eat a danish for peace." - Diablo

Offline Slash27

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 12795
Cold War - Hot War
« Reply #20 on: May 16, 2004, 12:23:43 AM »
Where is MILF city?:rofl

Offline DiabloTX

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9592
Cold War - Hot War
« Reply #21 on: May 16, 2004, 05:15:00 AM »
Shhhhhh...it's a secret.

:aok
"There ain't no revolution, only evolution, but every time I'm in Denmark I eat a danish for peace." - Diablo

Offline AcePappy

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 50
Cold War - Hot War
« Reply #22 on: May 16, 2004, 12:50:48 PM »
Hey this sounds like a cool setup, would be pretty interesting, and have some type of missions based on "Fail Safe" that would be cool, that's if any of you people even know what "Fail Safe" was during those years of the cold war. But Anyways Artik, Nice Idea I like it!, oh and Rafe, who really cares what the name was whether it be USAF and USAAF or whatever the hell you said, just as long as it is USA and UK vs USSR, big deal, it's a nice setup either way, but nice try on getting technical about it! ;)

Offline artik

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1908
      • Blog
Cold War - Hot War
« Reply #23 on: May 16, 2004, 01:11:40 PM »
Yes it would be very interesting to see how Mustangs, Spitfires and Thunderbolts will deal with Yaks and Lavochkins, How the strategic bomb aviation will deal with tactical....
Artik, 101 "Red" Squadron, Israel