Author Topic: A View from the Eye of the Storm  (Read 14242 times)

Offline NUKE

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8599
      • Arizona Greens
A View from the Eye of the Storm
« Reply #135 on: June 21, 2004, 04:19:16 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Pongo
Good to see that Americas best and brightest have been convinced they have to defend the people that attacked the WTC. And attack and invade those that didnt but blame them.

Time to launch the USS George Orwell. CVN 100


As usual, nobody but you knows what the hell you are talking about.

Offline ravells

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1982
A View from the Eye of the Storm
« Reply #136 on: June 21, 2004, 04:24:09 PM »
I know what Pongo's talking about...does that count? ;)

Ravs

Offline Seeker

  • Parolee
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2653
A View from the Eye of the Storm
« Reply #137 on: June 21, 2004, 04:36:19 PM »
Me too! Me too!


Offline NUKE

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8599
      • Arizona Greens
A View from the Eye of the Storm
« Reply #138 on: June 21, 2004, 04:43:36 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by ravells
I know what Pongo's talking about...does that count? ;)

Ravs


If you want to be counted as ignornant as Pongo.

The US attacked those that attacked the WTC.

Offline ravells

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1982
A View from the Eye of the Storm
« Reply #139 on: June 21, 2004, 04:49:28 PM »
oh yes, those damn, Iraquuuuuuuueees.

Ravs :)

Offline Pongo

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6701
A View from the Eye of the Storm
« Reply #140 on: June 21, 2004, 04:53:00 PM »
You dont have to understand me Nuke. Just understand the original writer of this thread.

He talkes about circles.  Of course he is talking about in relation to Palistinian terrorism although he cant admit it.

But in regards to the WTC attacks. If the Saudis are the outer (benevolent) circle.. Who makes up the more sinsister inner circles?

Easy to see with Hamas and the Palistinians. But with Al Quida..Bit harder..You have the Saudis...and the Saudis..lol
And Saudis flying the planes incase you missed that. Getting into the states with special "no verification" saudi visas!
And then most of the upper level "Saudis" fleeing the US with special permision from Bush..

Offline ravells

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1982
A View from the Eye of the Storm
« Reply #141 on: June 21, 2004, 04:54:51 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Seeker
Me too! Me too!



You see much but contribute little, grasshopper!

Ravs

Offline Toad

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 18415
A View from the Eye of the Storm
« Reply #142 on: June 22, 2004, 12:43:51 AM »
Six, keep doing the ostrich. Any objective reading of the news indicates the Saudis are progressing. Not as fast as YOU like, of course, but there's progress. The Treasury report is just another example that, like all others contradicting you, you choose to ignore or disdain.

Like this one:

Saudi Arabia tells terrorists to repent or die

Quote
In a major annual policy address to the Shura Council, King Fahd recalled a promise of municipal elections, but did not set a date for the first ever polls in the country - in principle due to take place later this year.

"We will not allow a subversive group driven by deviant thinking to undermine this country's security or destabilize it," Fahd said at the opening of the fourth year of the third legislative term of the 120-member council in the Red Sea city of Jeddah.



See? Steps in the right direction. Now, ignore it, change the subject or impugn it.. but it's still there. It's happening whether you choose to notice or not.

The Czechs think is a reason to go to war?

I've never said anything like that on this board or anywhere else. Are you making it a statement of your belief? Or what?

If you attribute that to me, you're simply making it up.


It's pretty clear , huh? How clear? Clear proof? Or do the Czechs think this happened?

No, it's reasonably well documented. Here, educate yourself;


Positive test for terror toxins in Iraq


Quote
SARGAT, Iraq, April 4 —  MSNBC.com tests reveal evidence of the deadly toxins ricin and botulinum at a laboratory in a remote mountain region of northern Iraq allegedly used as a terrorist training camp by Islamic militants with ties to the al-Qaida terrorist network.


Oil Production. They've increased production to lower and stabilize the price. There is a limit to how much production the world's refineries can handle. Supposedly that limit has been reached.

Here read this again:

Saudi Arabia and oil

Quote
Even more important is Saudi Arabia's role as swing producer. Unlike other countries, the Saudis keep several million barrels per day (bpd) of idle capacity on hand for emergencies. Today Saudi Arabia is the only country with much spare capacity available (see chart 1), though the precise amount is a matter of intense debate. Nansen Saleri, an official at Saudi Aramco, the country's state-owned oil company, will say only that Saudi output will rise in June to about 9m bpd, and that the country can raise its output above 10m bpd “rapidly”.


This spare capacity allows the Saudis to moderate oil-price spikes. They have done precisely this at various times: during the Iran-Iraq war, when output from both countries was disrupted; during and after the first Gulf war, when output from Iraq and Kuwait was lost; and last year, when civil strife in Venezuela and Nigeria curbed output from both countries on the eve of last year's invasion of Iraq (which itself disrupted Iraqi output).

Produce the juice
The Saudis remain keen to moderate prices by using their buffer capacity. Last week, when some OPEC ministers rebuffed a Saudi proposal to raise output quotas at the Beirut meeting, they offered to lift production unilaterally. That might cool prices a bit, but would also leave the Saudis with less spare capacity to prevent a further oil shock.


Are not you the one who said we can't ruffle their feathers because of their vote and influence in opec?

LOL! Nope. I said perhaps some of their previous actions with respect to oil/gas contracts are caused by the pressure we're putting on them to reform. You know, that pressure you apparently think doesn't exist. That must be what you're talking about. I think I took the position we've already ruffled their feathers with the reform talk.

Right here, right now, who controls that flow of oil?

State Oil Marketing Organization (SOMO)

Here, educate yourself:

Iraq

Quote
Iraqi oil sales and exports currently are being handled by SOMO, under CPA supervision. SOMO operations were seriously disrupted by war and turmoil during 2003, but the organization has now been reconstituted and has resumed many of its operations. On June 5, 2003, SOMO issued its first oil sales tender since the war started, for 8 million barrels of Kirkuk crude stored in tanks at Ceyhan and 2 million barrels stored at Basra. Dozens of companies placed bids for the oil, with winners including ChevronTexaco, Cepsa, ENI, Repsol, Total, and Tupras. Bids for the Kirkuk oil reportedly ranged around $2.70-$3.30 per barrel below dated Brent (f.o.b. Ceyhan). On June 22, a tanker arrived at Ceyhan to load the first oil since March 20, 2003, when the 600,000-barrel tanker "Caithness" completed loading one day after the outbreak of war. On July 3, SOMO issued its second spot tender, for 8 million barrels of Basra Light.


I think they're eager to regain their sovereignity and I think they're going to "flex their muscles" to show everyone they HAVE their sovereignity back. I think this will apply to the oil especially.


And I guess getting them to give up on God coming down to kill all the jews is going to take some time, eh? Sorry for asking for so much so soon.

You ought to be. If you think 1000 years of history and animosity are going to be overcome in your 120 minute Hollywood window... you need to rethink.


Well, we got all those troops half way around the world and conquered a country pretty quick, but I guess a firm stance with the saudis is going to take a 20 year plan

My oh my! Is Six advocating the invasion of Saudi Arabia? War for Oil?

Again, show me where I said they are the only problem?

Reread your own posts. Every one is basically a beechfest against the Saudis.

Right, like syria and iran, so maybe we should start treating them the same, no?

NO! Because they are NOT like Syria and Iran. We've had a mutually beneficial relationship with them since WW2. They're helping us right now, even if you are too blind to see it. Both Syria and Iran, OTOH, are allowing/encouraging Islamic militants to cross into Iraq with deadly results for our troops. The Iranians, in particular; I think if details of the messages we intercepted and read are ever release it'll be eye-popping stuff.

No, we probably bought Iranian oil through a middleman. Possibly without even knowing it.
 
I guess time will, we will see. But in the meantime, if you meet a saudi prince, you can shake his hand, i'm not.

In your conclusion jumping, one you appear to have jumped to is that I like the Saudis and what they've done. Not the case. Rather it's Henry K's Realpolitik. At the moment, their government is helping us and we need the help. You just can't see that.

thnx to saudi cooperation they are chopping American's heads off.

Cooperation? You mean some of the Saudi police loaned them uniforms and such? Hey.. did you forget the 101 trooper that fragged his officers right before the war started?

They aren't the only ones are they?

Quote
Sgt. Asan Akbar rolled a grenade into each of three tents of sleeping officers and senior NCOs of the 101st Airborne Division. Then he allegedly shot the soldiers with an automatic weapon as they fled from their tents. Two of them, a major and a captain, died, and 14 others were injured....

...Akbar, a convert to Islam, reportedly said when he was captured: "You guys are coming into our countries and you're going to rape our women and kill our children."
 


Yeah, they're infiltrated. So are we. Just how exactly do you expect them... or us.. to put an "an immediate stop to that "? Enlighten me. Please.

but if things don't start to change, I am not the only one who is going to have those feelings.

They have started to change. Very slowly. So slowly you obviously can't see it through your set opinions.
If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude than the animated contest of freedom, go from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains sit lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen!

Offline Toad

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 18415
A View from the Eye of the Storm
« Reply #143 on: June 22, 2004, 12:48:03 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Pongo
Good to see that Americas best and brightest have been convinced they have to defend the people


Who's defending them?

The guy that gave the speech made it clear they are a part of the problem.

Haven't seen anyone disagree with that yet.

Suprised you missed it. Skimming everything again?
If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude than the animated contest of freedom, go from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains sit lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen!

Offline Toad

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 18415
A View from the Eye of the Storm
« Reply #144 on: June 22, 2004, 12:49:07 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Pongo
He talkes about circles.  Of course he is talking about in relation to Palistinian terrorism although he cant admit it.



No, he isn't. You really should actually read it all before you make comments like that.
If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude than the animated contest of freedom, go from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains sit lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen!

Offline Pongo

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6701
A View from the Eye of the Storm
« Reply #145 on: June 22, 2004, 01:51:44 AM »
Yes he is. I did read it.
Toad your heads in the sand if you dont see that Saudi arabia has been the bigest threat to the US in the last 20 years.

Just look at who attacked you. That guy is trying to drill up some "enemy of our enemy" support when his enemy is self created.

Lots of his stuff on the arabs is interesting. But his lack of introspective is telling.

same old ground. If you dont like the way that I dissagree with idiots that you apperenlty disagree with, why dont you disagree with them.

Offline Flit

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1035
A View from the Eye of the Storm
« Reply #146 on: June 23, 2004, 12:00:45 AM »
food for thought
"our God"{christian} (take that as you will) says basically be honest
 "They're God" says "its ok to lie if your makeing an agreement with anyone of not our faith"
 It ain't about any one country, it's a way of life
 and SA (I think,  not that that counts for anything) is is making a Effort
What else can you ask for?
« Last Edit: June 23, 2004, 12:03:44 AM by Flit »

Offline Toad

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 18415
A View from the Eye of the Storm
« Reply #147 on: June 23, 2004, 09:59:44 AM »
Here you go, Pongo.  These are the guy's main points on the problem.

Do you agree or disagree. Just keep it simple, one word for each, either "agree" or "disagree".

I'll go first. I'd like to see your answers, as well as Nash, Six and Seeker.


Quote
But before you fight and win, by force or otherwise, you have to realize that you are in a war


AGREE


Quote
In my humble opinion, the number one danger to the world today is Iran and its regime.


DISAGREE



Quote
In order to win the war it is also necessary to dry the financial resources of the terror conglomerate.  


AGREE

Quote
It is crucial to stop Saudi and other financial support of the outer circle, which is the fertile breeding ground of terror.


AGREE


Quote
Above all, never surrender to terror.


AGREE

 
Now go ahead, let's see how much we really differ about the guy's conclusions.
If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude than the animated contest of freedom, go from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains sit lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen!

Offline Pongo

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6701
A View from the Eye of the Storm
« Reply #148 on: June 23, 2004, 12:19:33 PM »
"What is behind the suicide murders? Money, power and cold-blooded murderous incitement, nothing else."

As I have been saying. I dissagree with this and its one of his centeral points. Isreali occupation and oppression of the palistinians is behind the Suicide bombers that they face. Period.


"Suicide murders also have nothing to do with poverty and despair. The poorest region in the world, by far, is Africa. It never happens there."

I dissagree with this. If you parked a rich city like telavev beside a slum in centeral africa then put an army in place to keep the people in the slum..you would have all kinds of interesting things happen. poverty is a big part of this. Especialy poverty in contrast to success.


"An incredible number of people in the Arab world believe that September 11 never happened, or was an American provocation or, even better, a Jewish plot.
"

This man should not cast stones. He is being dishonest himself. A simular % of americans believed a year after 9/11 that it was Iraq that was responsible. Like I said,people should not cast stones.

"A woman walks into an Israeli restaurant in mid-day, eats, observes families with old people and children eating their lunch in the adjacent tables and pays the bill. She then blows herself up, killing 20 people, including many children, with heads and arms rolling around in the restaurant. She is called "martyr" by several Arab leaders and "activist" by the European press. Dignitaries condemn the act but visit her bereaved family and the money flows.
"

The man starts his speach with a lie that he is not talking about isreal. But of course one of the centeral stories in his speach is about isreal. THe whole diatrabe that follows is about isreal. You say Im imagining that he is talking about isreal because of some bias of mine. He is talking about isreal and trying to graft the specifics of the palistinian uprising to apply to al quida. They are different things. They are orginized differently.


Much of what he says I agree with. The sad state of the Arab world. The poor leadership they have and how thier religion seems designed to make sure they have poor, brutal leaders. Thier conservatism cripples them from advancing into the modern world.
But

The man altough seemingly very brilliant is also very blind as to the obvios reasons that Isreal is in the situation they are in right now. By not honestly drawing attention to it he lies in exaclty the same way that he so methodically accuses his enemies of. Poetic I think.

Make no mistake. Men like this who can eloquently dismiss the suffering imposed by his country on others are a HUGE part of the problem.
All he has to do is say " how would isreali respond if forced by arms into the situtation that the palistinains are in?"


But he cannot. Its really the centeral point of his whole speach.
If you dont believe me, believe the weak minded who are its main target.

"
quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The root of the trouble is that this entire Moslem region is totally dysfunctional, by any standard of the word, and would have been so even if Israel would have joined the Arab league
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



I thought this was the main point."

So argue with Nuke. He thought it was the main point too.

Offline Toad

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 18415
A View from the Eye of the Storm
« Reply #149 on: June 23, 2004, 01:53:45 PM »
:rofl

I knew you couldn't do it!

Tell you what, you go ahead and do the agree/disagree thing on his proposed "course of action" (is that semantically more pleasing to you than "problem? ;) ).

You do that and I'll adress your last line by line. And you know I actually will address what you said.
If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude than the animated contest of freedom, go from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains sit lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen!