Author Topic: My take on female leadership  (Read 3745 times)

Offline GRUNHERZ

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 13413
My take on female leadership
« Reply #90 on: July 12, 2004, 01:35:46 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by storch
well maybe you'll still be posting in a few years and you can tell us about your multiple divorces.

right MT?


In what line of work is your wife?

Offline fd ski

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1525
      • http://www.northotwing.com/wing/
My take on female leadership
« Reply #91 on: July 12, 2004, 01:40:38 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Sandman
I've never seen anyone become a leader because of training.


While I agree with principle, I'd say leadership as a quality is same as most arts:

You have to be born with some genious within you to reach the heights of your profession. If you're average, you can study your bellybutton off and prop yourself up to a "darn good" level, however, you'll never be a "natural".

It goes for most things in live, really.

Most are average leaders, best ones are easy to spot. Funny thing is, you'll rarely see them on top.

storch

  • Guest
My take on female leadership
« Reply #92 on: July 12, 2004, 02:23:49 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by GRUNHERZ
In what line of work is your wife?


prior to our first pregnancy in 1980 she was involved in commercial real estate.  after the birth of our daughter in 1981 she decided to be a full time mom.  It was very difficult for me to pull the economic wagon alone so in 1986 we started an Amway business which we could run from home.  We were very successful in that venue and were soon earning as much as I was at work in about ten hours per week.  When that business transitioned to an internet format it really took off.  Today that outfit is called Quixtar.  This change took the business focus from me having to stand before audiences and deliver a "pitch" and turned into a convenience thing for the end user.  She now runs it alone.  The income she generates has allowed us to build a really nice and profitable welding shop.  But basically she is doing what she has chosen to do, stay home and be a wife first then a mother and I love her all the more for it!  Even though at first I wasn't really keen on the idea.

Offline Lazerus

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2159
My take on female leadership
« Reply #93 on: July 12, 2004, 02:31:53 AM »
Just an interjection in this little debate, but I have worked for both men and women, and have had the same insecurities displayed by both. I have worked for and respected both, and have worked for and have had resentment for both. I do have to admit that the best (most effective) women that I have worked for seemed to be shackled by the fact that they were women. The majority of their time was spent proving that they were capable of doing their job. But their ability to lead and to manage was not arguable, and they were missed when they were let go.

As far as the long-term relationship goes, I think that Storch is right(God help me), and that the male figure of the relationship needs to be in charge. I have seen quite a few couples that have been together for more than five decades, ranging up to eighty years plus, and I think that the roles of the sexes are important to achieve this.

I'm not sexist by any means, and I respect any and every women that deserves it. The key is for both parties to repect each other and live their lives based on that respect.


flame away :D

Offline CyranoAH

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2304
My take on female leadership
« Reply #94 on: July 12, 2004, 03:11:56 AM »
Storch, I truly believe you should move to Stepford :D

Daniel

Offline Pongo

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6701
My take on female leadership
« Reply #95 on: July 12, 2004, 11:14:29 AM »
Ineffective woman leaders and managers are common. But no more common then males.
My experiance is that woman can make very effective leaders, when they err it might be typically a different kind of error then a male leader, but no more or less indicative of good leadership.
I have known woman that were intelligent, decisive, great comunicators and very hard workers. They had earned the trust of a vast majortity of thier employees and fought well and hard to improve thier orginisations and thier careers.
I have known woman that were back stabing, trouble making, boob hugging, incompetent waste of rations.
When quotas get into play all bets are off. Militant dyke quota girls that hire their like are a blemmish. As are over aggressive, car salesman talking, brown noseing, golf playing(usually cheating), "one of the guys" leaders that have been the blight for so long.


Grunhurtz, leadership cannot be taught except by the example of good leadership in an orginisation that recognises good leadership. Hand someone all the books and lectures you like. If they go into an enviroment where back stabers and brown nosers get ahead..they will either become that or fail.

go ahead and take your MBA or what every you have out to the work place and preach "leadership" training. Unless your a leadership sales man all the buzz words in the world wont help your carreer. While you are busy implementing your 15 step plans and buying everone inpirational posters. The guy that the boss likes the look of and that tells him what he wants to hear will get the promotion. You will adapt to that or you will not progress. In managment, progression is success.Delivery can be very very second place.

Everyone has had the same courses(maybe not from so illustirios a teacher) everyone has seen what really happens in management of orginisations. Male leaders are vulnerable to thier porn and football minds, female leaders are vulerable to thier figure skating and soap opra minds, both can be good leaders.

Offline Athena3

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 90
My take on female leadership
« Reply #96 on: July 12, 2004, 12:21:01 PM »
Ohhh boy.  Okay, I've been reading this thread on and off for the last couple of days and finally decided that you all need a new opinion that isn't from the 50s.  Let me say some of this is off topic, but I think you'll understand why I included it.

I am 25 years old, been married 2 years as of last week, but we've been dating off and on for 6 years.  As I read these posts I'm reminded a lot of my parent's marriage, then I realize that most of you are speaking of marriages 25-30 years stong.  My parents have been married 32, so you all are about the same generation.  Let me back track a bit here so you can understand where I'm coming from (sorry, lengthy family history).

My grandmother and grandfather (mom's side) married late in life, she was 28, he was 43.  They got married WWII era.  Now that's pretty old for a female back then, and you might wonder what she was doing before that.  Well, she graduated high school at 15 with full honors, graduated college at 19 with a maths degree (made the math honor society at *17* and got a 100 in a calculus course only her instructor told her it 'didn't look good for a girl to get this' so he gave her a 99) and was teaching 18 year old boys high school math at 19 (she was 5'1" and 98lbs, if you want a funny visual image).  Durning WWII she worked with engineers on the first radar system, taking the engineering terms on how to use it and do maintence on it and teaching the men who were going out into the field in layman's terms.  My grandfather was a mechanical engineer and they met and got married.  

Now I heard this story growing up and thought what a great, strong female role model my grandmother was.  She was one of the most intelligent women I have ever known and influenced who I am a great deal.  However, I tend to skip over her history after she got married.   Although she worked a bit here and there, she dropped right into the role a lot of you seem to talk about: she cooked, cleaned, sewed, raised the kids, did charity work, and a load of other domestic stuff.  Now don't kid yourself, I learned that side too, but by the time I was little my grandfather was dead and I got the good domestic education without seeing the submissive side of it, as least from her.

But here's the legacy of my grandparents that bothered me even more.  After they got married they had three children, first a boy, then my mom, then another boy.  My mom tells me stories sometimes about her childhood and one of them went something like this: my grandfather would take the boys out fishing.  My mom wanted to go but was told that she had to stay at home and help my grandmother in the garden.  When the boys returned from an afternoon out on the cool ocean, my mom was all sweaty and dirty from weeding in the hot sun.  The boys handed her the fish they had caught, went into the living room to read comic books and left her to clean and cook the fish for dinner.  But, it didn't stop there with the domestic roles, there were financial repercussions too.  My grandfather and two other men started an engineering company after WWII that has since gone international.  When my grandfather passed away the stocks were held by the families of these three men and were quite valuable.  When my grandfather's will was read, my mother found out that she had some regular shares in the company while her brothers got valuable voting shares worth 3 times as much as her own...

My mother is also one very smart lady with an IQ in the 160s, but growing up with this legacy of submissive women in turn affected her own marriage and relationships.  She and my dad have a 'comfortable' relationship now and my dad is one of the sweetest, most gentle and giving men I know, but if he complains about what's on the table for dinner, you better believe my mom will get up and make him something different.  She's always been the housewife doing the exact same role my grandmother did.  It worked for them, so great, but it's also been detrimental.  

My grandmother now has alzhimers or however you spell it.  She gets 24 hour care in her home because she was adament about not being put into a nursing home.  My mom was the child that set up the nurses and caregivers, my mom has been the one for years that continues to go to her house once a week and do stuff (my dad has always done the maintence of the property in his spare time) she's the one that fills in cleaning, feeding, dressing, and caring for her mother *without getting paid* when the nurses can't be there.  When her brothers call, they never ask how their mother is, never ask if the bills are getting paid or if there's enough money.  They say 'we're coming up for 2 weeks and staying at the property'.  I should mention my grandparent's house is on the ocean in maine.  When my mom made it clear that having extra people in the house confused my grandmother and sent her into a tizzy they said 'no problem, we'll stay with you' without even asking.  

Now, if you saw all of this from the outside, would you agree with me that the submissive role isn't a good one for women to learn?  My uncles have no respect for what my mom is going through (a difficult situation even if my grandmother WAS in a nursing home) and don't care about how much time she spends down there keeping the household running.  All they want is to be able to come up whenever they want to and make sure they get their inheritance.  All my grandmother is to them now is something that's blocking their way to money.  Now you may think that's not repercussions of the submissivness, but I know quite well it is.

But getting back to what I personally think of all this.  I got very lucky.  My parents, with these specific roles, had two daughters.  There was never any problem growing up with treating one child different from the other because we were both girls.  And it's funny, my sister learned all the sports and woodworking stuff (she's a fine furniture maker now) and I learned all the domestic stuff.  But that was just the way we wanted it.  But we saw how my mom got treated by her brothers, we saw the aftermath of what our grandmother had done and we said 'this is rediculous!'.  In my marriage (and Mj can back me up when he gets home from base) we are equal partners in everything.  Now right now it's difficult because i'm not working full time (but singers never work full time) and he's working 12 hour days in Air Force pilot training.  So of course I do more of the household stuff, bill paying, cooking, etc.  But if we were both working full time jobs, I'd expect him to do an equal share of the domestic stuff as well.  When we make decisions we make them together, not he makes it and I agree.  That's just rediculous!  Women can be just as smart and sensible as men are.  I'm a good example of that.  I'm smart and practical and I don't fit the stereotype of spending tons of money on clothes and purses and shoes.  If I don't agree with something he's said, you better darn well believe I'll correct him or at least discuss it with him.  That's just the way a good partnership should work.  If your spouse is saying something that's totally incorrect, you should mention it in a non-threatening way so they don't look like a total idiot.

And before I have to run, let me add to the original debate.  Of the women in my family, ALL of us have worked on committees at some point and NEVER have we broken up into subgroups or personally attacked someone or sat there and talked about something different for hours while everyone else was doing business.  We just don't function like that and I'm will to bet that there are a lot of mature women out there that don't either.  I'm a great person to work with in a group because I stay focused and I don't make it personal.  

Sorry this got so long, but sometimes I think it's valuable for you all to realize that there are some women around here :)

Offline capt. apathy

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4240
      • http://www.moviewavs.com/cgi-bin/moviewavs.cgi?Bandits=danger.wav
My take on female leadership
« Reply #97 on: July 12, 2004, 12:46:06 PM »
there is a perfect example of someone warping a good system into something it wasn't meant to be.

as I said in my other post, many people do this.  sadly it is especially common in people who hide it behind religion.  I know many men who can quote word for word what the Bible says about a wifes duties but can't seem to remember any of the verses relating to the mans responsibility.

theres a difference between taking a submissive role and being a slave.  and a difference between taking responsibility for another persons welfare and owning a servant.

from your description it sounds like your grandfather lost sight of the difference.

Offline Athena3

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 90
My take on female leadership
« Reply #98 on: July 12, 2004, 02:30:32 PM »
Nah, my grandfather didn't loose sight of the difference.  By all accounts he was a kind man (as I said before sadly I never got to knew him), but he was significantly older when the kids were born and was a bit distant as a father, didn't know how to relate to little girls so he focused on what he DID know and understand.  Perhaps back then that type of behavior was normal and expected and it would have seemed odd if he had included her in all of the boy's activities.  I honestly don't know, my mom doesn't like to talk about it much because of the on-going problems with my grandmother.

Offline Angus

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10057
My take on female leadership
« Reply #99 on: July 12, 2004, 02:56:04 PM »
I work with women a lot.
I exclusively hire women, have done so since last year, when I finally gave up on the men which in frequent numbers have Hortlunds attitude. Yeppers, the worst workers I had were actually the "I AM MACHO AND WOMEN SUCK" type of men.
I rather not hire Swedes, be it male or female, hence the brilliant line from Scholzie:

"I think it's more that SWEDES are not good leaders. "

Right now, I have one fine team of ladies taking (if needed) perfect care of my whole business.

Tonight, I shall show them this thread.

Poor Hortlund....

P.S. Which are worse, women or Russians?


And BTW, yes, Maggie Thatcher is a woman just in case someone did not recognize her picture
:D
It was very interesting to carry out the flight trials at Rechlin with the Spitfire and the Hurricane. Both types are very simple to fly compared to our aircraft, and childishly easy to take-off and land. (Werner Mölders)

Offline Silat

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2536
My take on female leadership
« Reply #100 on: July 12, 2004, 03:08:57 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by storch
prior to our first pregnancy in 1980 she was involved in commercial real estate.  after the birth of our daughter in 1981 she decided to be a full time mom.  It was very difficult for me to pull the economic wagon alone so in 1986 we started an Amway business which we could run from home.  We were very successful in that venue and were soon earning as much as I was at work in about ten hours per week.  When that business transitioned to an internet format it really took off.  Today that outfit is called Quixtar.  This change took the business focus from me having to stand before audiences and deliver a "pitch" and turned into a convenience thing for the end user.  She now runs it alone.  The income she generates has allowed us to build a really nice and profitable welding shop.  But basically she is doing what she has chosen to do, stay home and be a wife first then a mother and I love her all the more for it!  Even though at first I wasn't really keen on the idea.



Is this the Quixtar you are talking about Storch? Sounds like a pyramid type enterprise to me.
                 

"Quixtar Average Income

There's apparently some confusion about the Quixtar business opportunity and I'd like to make three points that will hopefully eliminate some of that confusion. Those promoting Quixtar claim that, when run properly, a Quixtar IBO can achieve "financial freedom" and do so in just a few years. Critics of Quixtar contend that such claims are bogus and that most IBOs end up losing money operating their Quixtar business. Who's right? Who's wrong? Does the truth reside somewhere in the middle? I'll list my points and let you decide.

Point One: Average Income
According to Quixtar's own "disclosure document" (pdf) the average monthly gross income for an "active" IBO is $115 (or $1,380 annually). Just a reminder, gross income means before expenses such as travel, lodging, training, motivational materials, etc. Quixtar even admits that "there may be significant business expenses, mostly discretionary, that may be greater in relation to income in the first years of operation." How many years? Quixtar doesn't specify. Could be two or twenty for all we know.

"But wait," you say. "Averages can be easily skewed by extremely high or low numbers. Many IBOs sign up and then sit on their bellybutton which inevitably brings down the average income."

Well, that's correct. Averages can be distorted by extremely high or low numbers but maybe that's why Quixtar only counted "ACTIVE" IBOs. In fact, Quixtar did not include one third of all its registered IBOs when determining average income. That statistic alone is incredible but let's put it in perspective. Let's say there are 300,000 registered IBOs. According to Quixtar, 100,000 of them are not "active" and weren't included in the income average calculation. Would you like to reconsider that "distorted average" theory?

Point Two: Financial Freedom
Quixtar claims on its quixtarfacts.com site that it has paid out $1 billion in bonuses since its launch in September, 1999. That's roughly $200 million per year (dividing $1 billion by 5 years) and is a very impressive figure. However, let's take a closer look at this figure.

According to the U.S. Census, the average annual household income in the U.S. is $47,101. That's not a lot of money but a significant number of Americans are able to live comfortably on that amount. Now let's just say that the goal of a Quixtar IBO is to match the U.S. average of $47,101. How many IBOs will be able to earn that much from Quixtar before the $200 million is gone? Well, my math (and check it yourself) reveals that only 4,255 IBOs (in this hypothetical example) earned the U.S. average income. That number is smaller than the number of people at the motivational rally I went to in Forth Worth.

Now, increase that total to $75,000 per year and you're left with only 2,667 IBOs with "financial freedom." Or maybe I don't understand what it means to be "financially free?" All I know is that when I start really looking at Quixtar's own numbers, I'm left with more questions than answers.

Point Three: Comparing Averages
I'm not a big fan of averages. They're too easily manipulated. I'd prefer if Quixtar had given the median income for "active" IBOs but I play with the hand I'm dealt and so I'll compare some averages. Below you'll find a listing of average annual incomes for various professions and levels of education. Keep in mind that the figures below also include those who may be lazy or unenthusiastic.


Engineer (data from 1999) = $84,314
Farmer (data from 2002) = $1,700 (pdf)
Small Business (data from 2000) = $1.9 million
Physicians (data from 1998) = $200,000
College Graduates (data from 1999) = $45,400
Quixtar IBO (data from 2001) = $1,380 (pdf)"
+Silat
"The first time someone shows you who they are, believe them." — Maya Angelou
"Conservatism offers no redress for the present, and makes no preparation for the future." B. Disraeli
"All that serves labor serves the nation. All that harms labor is treason."

storch

  • Guest
My take on female leadership
« Reply #101 on: July 12, 2004, 04:00:47 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Silat
Is this the Quixtar you are talking about Storch? Sounds like a pyramid type enterprise to me.
                 

"Quixtar Average Income

There's apparently some confusion about the Quixtar business opportunity and I'd like to make three points that will hopefully eliminate some of that confusion. Those promoting Quixtar claim that, when run properly, a Quixtar IBO can achieve "financial freedom" and do so in just a few years. Critics of Quixtar contend that such claims are bogus and that most IBOs end up losing money operating their Quixtar business. Who's right? Who's wrong? Does the truth reside somewhere in the middle? I'll list my points and let you decide.

Point One: Average Income
According to Quixtar's own "disclosure document" (pdf) the average monthly gross income for an "active" IBO is $115 (or $1,380 annually). Just a reminder, gross income means before expenses such as travel, lodging, training, motivational materials, etc. Quixtar even admits that "there may be significant business expenses, mostly discretionary, that may be greater in relation to income in the first years of operation." How many years? Quixtar doesn't specify. Could be two or twenty for all we know.

"But wait," you say. "Averages can be easily skewed by extremely high or low numbers. Many IBOs sign up and then sit on their bellybutton which inevitably brings down the average income."

Well, that's correct. Averages can be distorted by extremely high or low numbers but maybe that's why Quixtar only counted "ACTIVE" IBOs. In fact, Quixtar did not include one third of all its registered IBOs when determining average income. That statistic alone is incredible but let's put it in perspective. Let's say there are 300,000 registered IBOs. According to Quixtar, 100,000 of them are not "active" and weren't included in the income average calculation. Would you like to reconsider that "distorted average" theory?

Point Two: Financial Freedom
Quixtar claims on its quixtarfacts.com site that it has paid out $1 billion in bonuses since its launch in September, 1999. That's roughly $200 million per year (dividing $1 billion by 5 years) and is a very impressive figure. However, let's take a closer look at this figure.

According to the U.S. Census, the average annual household income in the U.S. is $47,101. That's not a lot of money but a significant number of Americans are able to live comfortably on that amount. Now let's just say that the goal of a Quixtar IBO is to match the U.S. average of $47,101. How many IBOs will be able to earn that much from Quixtar before the $200 million is gone? Well, my math (and check it yourself) reveals that only 4,255 IBOs (in this hypothetical example) earned the U.S. average income. That number is smaller than the number of people at the motivational rally I went to in Forth Worth.

Now, increase that total to $75,000 per year and you're left with only 2,667 IBOs with "financial freedom." Or maybe I don't understand what it means to be "financially free?" All I know is that when I start really looking at Quixtar's own numbers, I'm left with more questions than answers.

Point Three: Comparing Averages
I'm not a big fan of averages. They're too easily manipulated. I'd prefer if Quixtar had given the median income for "active" IBOs but I play with the hand I'm dealt and so I'll compare some averages. Below you'll find a listing of average annual incomes for various professions and levels of education. Keep in mind that the figures below also include those who may be lazy or unenthusiastic.


Engineer (data from 1999) = $84,314
Farmer (data from 2002) = $1,700 (pdf)
Small Business (data from 2000) = $1.9 million
Physicians (data from 1998) = $200,000
College Graduates (data from 1999) = $45,400
Quixtar IBO (data from 2001) = $1,380 (pdf)"


Well that is the Quixtar to which I refer and we are in the top earners with an international organization producing residual income for us.  It is a very very tough business to make it in, let no one tell you otherwise.  But if you are focused and disciplined and willing to put up with tons of rejection it can work for you.  Our best year we earned a little over $300,000.00 US but we don't earn anywhere near that since Sept, 11, 2001.  Still what we earn is enough to keep us in a very comfortable lifestyle while not having to slave away at a job.  I work my welding shop out of principle.  I couldn't be in a position where I was idle  but if you run up my time logged into the AH game you can see that if I want to I can be a pasty skin.  That comes from not needing to have to go to work to pay my bills.

If you are considering that business I'll share a few pointers.  

I would recommend that you find a dynamic hard working sponsor that can show you photocopies of bonus checks that are at least $3000.00 per month.  Anyone else is a bullchitter.  You will spend much time with your sponsor as he or she teaches you how to develope your organization.

Be prepared to work your arse off for one year expecting zero financial results.

Forget your friends and family.  build your business with FTBs (friends to be).

Don't sponsor broke people.  broke people are that way for a reason.  I'm not a liberal and I'm not a philantropist.  I'm here to help those that are willing and able to help themselves.  I personally only sponsored people who earned more money than I did.  Doctors are great prospects. with medicine leaving less discreationary income you have a ready market of hard working, dedicated, focused and caring people who can also believe that it is possible to earn the money that is available through this type of business.

You must be winsome and a good listener.

You must be willing to put the other guy's needs before your own.

If you can help fifteen people attain an income level that they are comfortable with you will never need to balance your checkbook again.

the rest is easy the products are great, everyone uses them and the delivery system is flawless. believe it then you may achieve it.

Feel free to ask any questions.

Offline Pongo

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6701
My take on female leadership
« Reply #102 on: July 12, 2004, 04:16:30 PM »
Where do I sign up!

storch

  • Guest
My take on female leadership
« Reply #103 on: July 12, 2004, 04:18:02 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Pongo
Where do I sign up!


I forgot to mention I don't sponsor pinheads

Offline Mini D

  • Parolee
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6897
      • Fat Drunk Bastards
My take on female leadership
« Reply #104 on: July 12, 2004, 04:29:55 PM »
I've had female bosses that were very effective leaders, were respected and did their jobs well.  I wanted to have sex with all of them.  Preferably at the same time.