Nah, it just means that I didn't explain my crappy analogy well enough.
"Now go ahead, spring your little trap! Go! You go girl!"
"We found the weapons of mass destruction. We found biological laboratories. You remember when Colin Powell stood up in front of the world, and he said, Iraq has got laboratories, mobile labs to build biological weapons. They're illegal. They're against the United Nations resolutions, and we've so far discovered two. And we'll find more weapons as time goes on. But for those who say we haven't found the banned manufacturing devices or banned weapons, they're wrong, we found them."
http://www.whitehouse.gov/g8/interview5.htmlBush called the possible mobile weapons labs, weapons of mass destruction, which are are not. This is a lie.
Now I imagine you might be thing, "Yes Thrawn, you tard, but lying also has to be done with intent. Perhaps Bush didn't know they weren't WMD."
Well, I guess this is possible. But you and I (and I imagine NUKE as well) knows they aren't, and Bush is the President of US with access to some of the best minds in the world to advise him. He alsoo brought the US to war (which resulted in the deaths of thousands, if not tens of thousands of people)
primarily on WMD arguement. God forbid that he was such a moronic incompetant that he did this without actually knowing what they are.
So it seems to me that there are two choices, liar or moronic incompetant.
PS: Hortlund, it doesn't suprise me at all that you don't know when you are actually answering a question and when you are evading it. No, your statement doesn't answer my question at all. But just FYI, the
possible biological weapons labs turned out to be nothing more than hydrogen producing plants for the use in weather ballons for artillary purposes.
