Author Topic: Best Climb Speed Con't for Nashwan  (Read 12730 times)

Offline Nashwan

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1864
Best Climb Speed Con't for Nashwan
« Reply #60 on: August 25, 2004, 12:11:50 PM »
Quote
Documents I have on the Spit I show the following (below FTH its fairly linear):

Increasing climb speed from 160 mph EAS to 175 mph EAS costs about 28 ft/min in climb rate. Increasing climb speed from 160 mph EAS to 200 mph EAS costs about 315 ft/min in climb rate. This would suggest that increasing the climb speed on a Spit IX from 170 IAS to 182 mph IAS would have a negligible effect on climb rate.


Thanks. That sounds much more like what I was expecting, with little change at the start, a more rapid drop off as speed increases towards maximum

Quote
What I think Crump is arguing is that while the Spit can climb faster than the Fw190 at 182mph it needs a steeper angle to do so and because of that cannot simply follow the Fw190's exact path.


There is a lot of confusion between angle of climb and angle of attack on this thread.

Angle of attack means a plane is travelling in a different direction to the one it's facing, although only very slightly. In level flight, the angle of attack of the wings has to be slightly positive to provide lift. The slower you are going, the higher the angle of attack.

The same is true in climbs. The nose will not follow the angle of climb exactly.

That's true in all attitudes of flight.

It's like saying a Spit cannot get a guns solution on a Fw 190 in level flight because the Spit needs a positive angle off attack, and if he depresses his nose to bring the 190 under his sights, he won't have enough lift, and will start to descend, or if he pulls the nose up he will have too much lift and will start to climb.

It's true, but it's only a minor difference, and of course affects every aircraft. Using an AoA comparison, no plane can follow another in a climb.

Quote
He isn't arguing about climb rates. He is talking about climb rates at a given AoA. Using made up numbers, it would look something like this:

Spitfire LF.IX at a 18.5 degree AOA and 170mph climbs at 4,700fpm


Angle of attack is relative to the direction of travel.

So if your flight path is angled up 15 degrees, and your angle of attack was 18.5 degrees, your plane would appear to an outside observer to be pointing up at 33.5 degrees.

Here's a good explanation of the difference:

http://142.26.194.131/aerodynamics1/Performance/climb.html

Quote
Therefore at 182mph the Spitfire has the choice of either matching/exceeding the Fw190's climb, or matching the Fw190's AoA. It can do one or the other, but not both.


This is true in level flight, and for all aircraft that require different angles of attack.

If a Spit and a 190 are side by side in level flight at the same speed, they will have slightly different angles of attack.

If the Spit tries to match the 190s angle of attack at that speed, he will start to climb, but very slowly.

If the 190 tries to match the Spit's angle of attack, he will start to dive, very slowly.

These are minor differences every aircraft has trying to follow another plane, in climb, dive or level flight.

Quote
Sin(climb angle) = Climbrate/Speed

IF you climb at 182mph and an angle of 14.5º, you MUST be doing 4000fpm.


Exactly. The climb angle and speed determine rate of climb.

The AoA is seperate, and is just the ammount you need to angle the wings of the plane relative to climb angle to maintain lift.

Quote
I don't think so. Different wing designs generate differing ammounts of lift.


Angle of attack is small, though, whereas the angle of climb is much greater.

As an example, at 200 IAS, the Spit VIII at 7500 lbs required an angle of attack of 1 degree.

That means to maintain level flight, the wings had to be 1 degree above horizontal.

To maintain climb, the wings have to be 1 degree above climb angle.

If you assume the 190 needed 2 degrees angle of attack at the same speed, if both were climbing at 18 degrees, then the Spits wings would be 19 degrees above horizontral, the 190s 20 degrees.

But they would both be following the same path.

If they both kept the same speed, they would both be exactly the same distance apart when they reached the top of the climb.

The Spit might need to make adjustments in it's climb angle to bring the 190 under it's sights, but they are simply adjustments, just as you make adjustments in level flight to bring guns to bear.

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23048
Best Climb Speed Con't for Nashwan
« Reply #61 on: August 25, 2004, 01:13:47 PM »
OK.  Maybe I meant climb angle.  I thought Crump had mentioned AoA earlier.

I'm not saying that Crump is right, I'm just trying to figure out what his argument even is.  He isn't being clear at all.
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline hitech

  • Administrator
  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 12425
      • http://www.hitechcreations.com
Best Climb Speed Con't for Nashwan
« Reply #62 on: August 25, 2004, 01:44:16 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Karnak
He isn't being clear at all.


I noticed that.

Infact his reference to flat power curves aplies to both planes. And with the speed ranges we are talking, the thrust HP will hardly chage at all.

The primary factor in this discusion is simply the drag curve of the planes. Best climb rate, and best glide angle are normaly very close to eachother in speed. The resone for this is that they are both at bottom of the drag curve. And because on the climb side with a constant speed prop that is matched well to the engine.

The thrust HP hardly changes threw the planes full speed range.

The drag curve is shifted to the right as wing loading goes up. Hence Higher wing loaded planes best climb speed is typicly faster.  But if you compare that climb speed to stall speed they will normaly be very close to the same %. So if stall is 100 and climb speed is 130. Just multiply stall by 1.33 of any plane with constant speed prop and you will be fairly close to it's best climb speed. Normaly this is around a 1.33 multiplier.

On a totaly side note, the question of what plane climbs better at what speed, is identical to the question, in level flight what plane accelerates better at what speed.


HiTech
« Last Edit: August 25, 2004, 02:02:58 PM by hitech »

Offline Crumpp

  • Parolee
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3671
Best Climb Speed Con't for Nashwan
« Reply #63 on: August 25, 2004, 02:02:50 PM »
Looking for hard numbers:

Then check out the USAAF tactical trials:

http://prodocs.netfirms.com/

The FW - 190 went over 200 knots in the climb and it hardly effected it's climb rate.

I am sorry you guys don't understand the science of what I am saying.  It is the truth and it is how it works.

Pyro can confirm that.

There are folks that have jumped in here confused that the SPIT climbs at 182 mph!! Then start running their keyboard without reading the thread.

I am not claiming the AoA would make huge difference.  The SPITFIRE CANNOT FOLLOW the FW-190 DIRECTLY below the FW-190's best climb rate.  It will be left behind because it travels at a slower speed along the same vector.

Of course when you drop the Angle of attack the speed will increase on BOTH airplanes.  The 190's speed will increase even more than the spits angle per angle.  It's climb angle is much shallower and it's power curve much higher.  Therefore angle per angle change it moves FURTHER down the power curve towards level flight speed!  

I suspect getting a gun solution would be more difficult due to the need to retrim and a certain flight characteristics when you have a large stick movement you haven't trim for first.  I have NOT claimed that to be true, yet.  Honestly though it would not matter.  With less drag and more weight the 190 will leave the Spitfire in zoom.

I have presented nothing but facts and science.  I have been disputed with nothing but innuendo and speculation.  If you disagree then by all means please find the science to back it up.   There are some smart guys in this thread so use that noodle for something besides "I don't think that is right".

Crumpp

Offline hitech

  • Administrator
  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 12425
      • http://www.hitechcreations.com
Best Climb Speed Con't for Nashwan
« Reply #64 on: August 25, 2004, 02:07:58 PM »
First off crump: I belive I do have a fair understanding of science. Especial when it comes to these caculations.

I have seen very little of it in your post, because you do not simply post 2 side by side speed to climb rate curves on both planes in question. That is all it takes to determin the answere to the question at hand.

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23048
Best Climb Speed Con't for Nashwan
« Reply #65 on: August 25, 2004, 02:12:26 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Crumpp
I am not claiming the AoA would make huge difference.  The SPITFIRE CANNOT FOLLOW the FW-190 DIRECTLY below the FW-190's best climb rate.  It will be left behind because it travels at a slower speed along the same vector.

As written this must be false.  For it to be true the Spitfire would have to shed more than 700fpm of climb rate for gaining 12mph airspeed.  If that were true then the Spitfire would have a top sealevel speed of ~250mph.

Now, as I said, I can see the Spitfire climbing at a steeper angle and greater rate of climb at 182mph or with a faster airspeed and lower rate of climb than the Fw190 while matching the Fw190's climb angle.

Anything else is physically impossible.

You must pick one.


Now, Pyro has agreed with you that the Fw190's best climb speed in AH is too low, but has he also agree with whatever else it is you're trying to say here?
« Last Edit: August 25, 2004, 02:14:46 PM by Karnak »
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline Crumpp

  • Parolee
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3671
Best Climb Speed Con't for Nashwan
« Reply #66 on: August 25, 2004, 02:14:19 PM »
http://www.hitechcreations.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=119961&perpage=50&highlight=190%20Level%20Speed&pagenumber=2

The other thread this question came up.  This thread was not intended as a rehash of the same issue. I couldn't get my point across to Nashwan and did not want to Hijack another thread.

Quote
First off crump: I belive I do have a fair understanding of science. Especial when it comes to these caculations.


I am sure you do and I wasn't talking to you.

Quote
I have seen very little of it in your post, because you do not simply post 2 side by side speed to climb rate curves on both planes in question. That is all it takes to determin the answere to the question at hand.


It's the very first post Hitech!


Crumpp

Offline hitech

  • Administrator
  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 12425
      • http://www.hitechcreations.com
Best Climb Speed Con't for Nashwan
« Reply #67 on: August 25, 2004, 02:58:13 PM »
Crumpp: I belive that the spit would be able to climb with the fw.


HiTech

Offline Crumpp

  • Parolee
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3671
Best Climb Speed Con't for Nashwan
« Reply #68 on: August 25, 2004, 03:08:38 PM »
I believe in the Tooth Fairey one time too.


:)

Crumpp

Offline hitech

  • Administrator
  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 12425
      • http://www.hitechcreations.com
Best Climb Speed Con't for Nashwan
« Reply #69 on: August 25, 2004, 03:19:16 PM »
Crump list the folling for me, don't provide links, just the numbers you think should be.

FW:
BestClimbSpeed,BestClimbRate,max speed,Brake Horse Power,weight

Spit:
BestClimbSpeed,BestClimbRate,max speed,Brake Horse Power,weight

I would then be glad to run the math, and prove this topic.
If Im corret you get to click on my bribe link?

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23048
Best Climb Speed Con't for Nashwan
« Reply #70 on: August 25, 2004, 03:20:19 PM »
Crump,

Can you graph out what you are trying to say?  If you can, but don't have a method to post it give me an email and I'll post it for you.
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline GODO

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 555
      • http://www.terra.es/personal2/matias.s/fw190.htm
Best Climb Speed Con't for Nashwan
« Reply #71 on: August 25, 2004, 03:40:16 PM »
hitech are you going to consider in your math what happens when you pull hard the stick for 2 seconds and then release it? Just imagine the following situation, you are going down diving a bit and then realize you are too near the ground, you pull back the stick as hard as you can and ease it once you are flying level again and safe.

Offline Crumpp

  • Parolee
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3671
Best Climb Speed Con't for Nashwan
« Reply #72 on: August 25, 2004, 04:00:51 PM »
FW-190A8

Best Climb Speed according to USAAF Test 160knot = 184 IASmph

Best Climb Speed according to Pilots manual = 180 IAS mph


Climb rate and level speed:

Roughly according to this chart (notice climb speed)  It's easy to vary the climb rate some.  Looks to me like this pilot climbed at the begining of the mushing realm.  

Level Speeds at 1.58ata/1.65ata please since the Spits using full boost in it's speed graph.

http://www.terra.es/personal2/matias.s/fw190-1.jpg

Spitfire Mk IX Merlin 66 (+25)

Best climb Speed = 170 mph IAS

Climb rate and level speed:

http://www.fourthfightergroup.com/eagles/jl165speed.gif

http://www.fourthfightergroup.com/eagles/jl165climb.gif


Now this only applies to the 190's best climb rate angle and below.  Once the 190 exceeds that it's all over.

The Spitfire has to directly follow the 190.  At anytime he would be able to abandon the direct chase, hike his nose up, and outclimb the 190 at a steeper angle but slower speed.


Crumpp

Offline Crumpp

  • Parolee
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3671
Best Climb Speed Con't for Nashwan
« Reply #73 on: August 25, 2004, 04:05:16 PM »
Thanks Karnak,

I just drew it out on a piece of paper according to how the Power curve and climb angle are graphed on this website.

I assumed the 190 and the Spit have the same top level speed.

There is a big difference in speeds at any angle under the 190's best climb rate angle.

I will see if can't pretty it up a little.

Crumpp

Offline MiloMorai

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6864
Best Climb Speed Con't for Nashwan
« Reply #74 on: August 25, 2004, 04:30:02 PM »
Dan there is another test with JL165,

Aircraft and Armament Experimental Establishment
Boscombe Down
1 Feb 1944

Spitfire IX JL.165
(Merlin 66)

Trials at +25 lb/sq.inch boost
with Rotol 4 blade propeller

http://www.fourthfightergroup.com/eagles/spit9.html