Author Topic: New bomber? Whats the CT's take?  (Read 1166 times)

Offline Sable

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 265
New bomber? Whats the CT's take?
« on: August 24, 2004, 03:46:59 PM »
So there is a lot of speculation over what the new bombers is going to be in the main forum.  What bomber would the CT flyers like to see?

Offline Sakai

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1041
Re: New bomber? Whats the CT's take?
« Reply #1 on: August 24, 2004, 04:19:19 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Sable
So there is a lot of speculation over what the new bombers is going to be in the main forum.  What bomber would the CT flyers like to see?


In maybe this order, but we could argue about that:

He-111
Ki-49 "Helen"
Il-4
Do-217
SM-79 "Sparveiro"
Vickers Wellington
North American B-25 Mitchell
Cant 1007 "Alcione"
Pe-2
Potez 631
H8K "Emily"
PBY-5 "catalina"
Aichi D4A "Judy"
Bristol Blenheim

After that, these (in no order):
Ju-52
Ki-21 Sally
B-24
Hs-123
Savoia Marchetti SM. 81
Su-2
Pe-8
He-177
Fiat Br 20
Hampden
Maryland
Baltimore
A-26
SB2 Helldiver
Arado 196
Cant Z.501


I'm sure I forgot several.
"The P-40B does all the work for you . . ."

Offline TheBug

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5652
New bomber? Whats the CT's take?
« Reply #2 on: August 24, 2004, 04:26:37 PM »
Agree with He-111 being number one.  SM-79 would be kinda a unique and interesting addition.
“It's a big ocean, you don't have to find the enemy if you don't want to."
  -Richard O'Kane

Offline Halo

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3222
New bomber? Whats the CT's take?
« Reply #3 on: August 24, 2004, 05:17:17 PM »
Good possibilities, but whatever bomber is added better have reasonable defensive armament or it will be just another museum piece, admired but rarely flown.
Luck is what happens when preparation meets opportunity. (Seneca, 1st century AD, et al)
Practice random acts of kindness and senseless beauty. (Anne Herbert, 1982, Sausalito, CA)
Paramedic to Perkaholics Anonymous

Offline Arlo

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 24759
Re: Re: New bomber? Whats the CT's take?
« Reply #4 on: August 24, 2004, 05:28:37 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Sakai
In maybe this order, but we could argue about that:

He-111
Ki-49 "Helen"
Il-4
Do-217
SM-79 "Sparveiro"
Vickers Wellington
North American B-25 Mitchell
Cant 1007 "Alcione"
Pe-2
Potez 631
H8K "Emily"
PBY-5 "catalina"
Aichi D4A "Judy"
Bristol Blenheim

After that, these (in no order):
Ju-52
Ki-21 Sally
B-24
Hs-123
Savoia Marchetti SM. 81
Su-2
Pe-8
He-177
Fiat Br 20
Hampden
Maryland
Baltimore
A-26
SB2 Helldiver
Arado 196
Cant Z.501


I'm sure I forgot several.


Well ... guess I'll just ditto my buddy Sakai. :aok

Offline Grits

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5332
New bomber? Whats the CT's take?
« Reply #5 on: August 24, 2004, 05:30:25 PM »
I'm hoping for a Swordfish or a Skua, or maybe a B-18 Bolo.

Offline Arlo

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 24759
New bomber? Whats the CT's take?
« Reply #6 on: August 24, 2004, 05:31:30 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Halo
Good possibilities, but whatever bomber is added better have reasonable defensive armament or it will be just another museum piece, admired but rarely flown.


Psssst .... this is CT's take on it. What's the great defensive armament on the Kate? It gets flown here. :D

Offline Grits

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5332
New bomber? Whats the CT's take?
« Reply #7 on: August 24, 2004, 05:34:33 PM »
Oh yeah, I also want an SB2U Vindicator, or a TBD Devastator.

Offline Arlo

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 24759
New bomber? Whats the CT's take?
« Reply #8 on: August 24, 2004, 05:37:27 PM »
Sure. Until then, I'd settle for a nicely rendered skin to magically convert the Kate. Hehe

Offline Grits

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5332
New bomber? Whats the CT's take?
« Reply #9 on: August 24, 2004, 05:40:50 PM »
Nooooooo.....Kate is to UBER!!

Offline Soulyss

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6558
      • Aces High Events
New bomber? Whats the CT's take?
« Reply #10 on: August 24, 2004, 06:00:16 PM »
I stand by my guess that we're getting the B-24.
80th FS "Headhunters"
I blame mir.

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23047
New bomber? Whats the CT's take?
« Reply #11 on: August 24, 2004, 06:03:07 PM »
Er, Sakai, I think a Russian bomber needs to be a higher priority than all that.
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

storch

  • Guest
New bomber? Whats the CT's take?
« Reply #12 on: August 24, 2004, 06:32:25 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Karnak
Er, Sakai, I think a Russian bomber needs to be a higher priority than all that.

Ditto

Offline Halo

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3222
New bomber? Whats the CT's take?
« Reply #13 on: August 24, 2004, 09:27:21 PM »
(QUOTE) Good possibilities, but whatever bomber is added better have reasonable defensive armament or it will be just another museum piece, admired but rarely flown.  (UNQUOTE)

(QUOTE) Psssst .... this is CT's take on it. What's the great defensive armament on the Kate? It gets flown here.  (UNQUOTE)

Yep, so does the Val.  I musta been mislead by the multi engines on the original proposal.  

True nostalgia demands eventual inclusion of the Wellesley, TB-3, and CANT Z.506B.
Luck is what happens when preparation meets opportunity. (Seneca, 1st century AD, et al)
Practice random acts of kindness and senseless beauty. (Anne Herbert, 1982, Sausalito, CA)
Paramedic to Perkaholics Anonymous

Offline Reschke

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7724
      • VF-17 "The Jolly Rogers"
New bomber? Whats the CT's take?
« Reply #14 on: August 24, 2004, 09:56:10 PM »
I know what it is but I can't tell ya...nanny nanny booo booo! I will say that Sakai has a pretty good idea of what is being brought up for near future additions; including the upcoming bomber.

To answer all you who don't believe that I know it lets just say that I saw the Ki-84 about a week or so before Natedog posted the screenshots of it and Superfly is working on the bomber. When I saw it the bomber didn't have a texture at all and Superfly was finishing up a few problem areas.

Also the new models support having different textures in the formerly mirrored areas like the underside of wings and tail sections.
« Last Edit: August 24, 2004, 09:58:12 PM by Reschke »
Buckshot
Reschke from March 2001 till tour 146
Founder and CO VF-17 Jolly Rogers September 2002 - December 2006
"I'm baaaaccccckkk!"