Author Topic: 190A5 wing problem (Read 1154 times)

Furball · « **Reply #15 on:** November 03, 2004, 01:12:36 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by streetstang
rgr Dok, Tiffys lost their tails due to over speed in a dive. It would just rip off... The entire tail.

only the very early typhoons and prototypes, they strengthened the tail and they had no probs after that.

look on this picture, just infront of the tail you can see the strengthening bars that keep the tail attached to the fuselage

Kev367th · « **Reply #16 on:** November 03, 2004, 01:56:31 PM »

If I remember correctly, later Tiffies were fitted with a Tempest tail also.

rpm · « **Reply #17 on:** November 03, 2004, 02:09:42 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Pyro
It should be back to normal in the next patch.

Hope it's due out soon. 190's are nearly impossible to pull any G's in.

streetstang · « **Reply #18 on:** November 03, 2004, 08:36:02 PM »

Quote

only the very early typhoons and prototypes, they strengthened the tail and they had no probs after that.

Thanks Fur, I forgot to mention that.

Nice picture btw.

streetstang · « **Reply #19 on:** November 03, 2004, 08:37:15 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Pyro
It's a problem that's come about due to the wing changes we made back for 2.00. We just didn't realize there was a problem in that because the structural limits were not ever getting called. It should be back to normal in the next patch.

See guys.

Nothing to worry about.

Thanks Pyro.

Furball · « **Reply #20 on:** November 04, 2004, 07:37:48 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by streetstang
Thanks Fur, I forgot to mention that.

Nice picture btw.

She looks better from the front, very much the... "im going to f***ing kill you" look

Guppy35 · « **Reply #21 on:** November 04, 2004, 05:37:49 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Furball
only the very early typhoons and prototypes, they strengthened the tail and they had no probs after that.

look on this picture, just infront of the tail you can see the strengthening bars that keep the tail attached to the fuselage

Kinda like the early 109Fs were losing tails and wings. Early P51Bs having motor mounts fail, etc etc.

Growing pains

Dan/Slack

DoKGonZo · « **Reply #22 on:** November 05, 2004, 12:14:17 PM »

HT, Pyro ... please tell us what "back to normal" means in this case? Will overstress be taken out or adjusted to more appropriate settings?

Pyro · « **Reply #23 on:** November 05, 2004, 12:47:01 PM »

Normal means they work at appropriate levels.

paulobrien6969 · « **Reply #24 on:** November 06, 2004, 10:32:26 AM »

ty pyro
having bad day today coz of the wing snapping issue.
glad to hear its gonna be sorted

AKFokerFoder+ · « **Reply #25 on:** November 08, 2004, 04:06:44 PM »

Quote

It's a problem that's come about due to the wing changes we made back for 2.00. We just didn't realize there was a problem in that because the structural limits were not ever getting called. It should be back to normal in the next patch.

I am having some wing rip problems with the 190A8 also.

I hope the A8 will also be looked at in the next patch

All in all AH2 rocks, keep up the good work