Author Topic: Turning The Tables George Galloway (Read 6238 times)

Nash · « **Reply #225 on:** May 21, 2005, 04:21:38 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by NUKE
Just jump right in champ.

Into this? I really don't recommend it.

Nuke, from Merriam-Webster:

Control:

2 a : to exercise restraining or directing influence over.

You find it so ridiculous that this would have any relationship to ME-US history?

Give me a break.

Man... The real problem here is that you continually break every thread you enter down into little tiny peices, pick out the parts you don't like, and ram them repeatedly down everyone's throat.

Or just make the weirdest, most provocative statements out of nowhere.

It's sad because the discussions, which could be very interesting and informative, always come down to some simple rhetoric.

Why aren't we talking about, as Hang suggested, The Shah or Iran. Standard Oil and the Saudi Royal House. Oman. Jordan. The U.A.E.?

Because nobody can. Because the minute they do, some sentence will get dissassembled by you and like a pitbull latching onto it, will just never let the discussion evolve.

There are way smarter people than you and I, Nuke. Get used to it. Give them a bit of room, okay?

NUKE · « **Reply #226 on:** May 21, 2005, 04:27:10 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Hangtime
Nuke.. lets shorten this up a bit.

Why do YOU think the US is involved in the middle east today instead of africa?

We ain't in the middle east protecting Kurds or ****es or Sunni's.

Were in the mideast protecting petro-bucks.

And if Africa should discover sufficent oil reserves, our politicians will develop humanitarin reasons to go 'stabilize' that region too.

Grow up, wake up and quit being such a freakin christian right republican tool.

Out!

Hangtime, why did we deploy in Bosnia, Somalia, Grenada, Vietnam, Korea and WWII? Oil?

Nash · « **Reply #227 on:** May 21, 2005, 04:31:01 PM »

Oh, and Skuzzy should put you on probation - the condition being that you only get to ask one question for every three factual, relevant, and informative statements you make in the service of the discussion. Just my opnion.

NUKE · « **Reply #228 on:** May 21, 2005, 04:31:05 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Nash
Into this? I really don't recommend it.

Man... The real problem here is that you continually break every thread you enter down into little tiny peices, pick out the parts you don't like, and ram them repeatedly down everyone's throat.

I repeat statements that can't be supported, yet are defended by idiots. You have never said why you feel the Iraq war was about oil.

I have a pretty high IQ, I am not stupid. You seem stupid.

Nash · « **Reply #229 on:** May 21, 2005, 04:38:25 PM »

I've said this to you before every time you bring up your so-called IQ, and I'll say it again, for what it is worth. I have met many, many intelligent people and not once have they ever brought up their IQ. Conversely.....

Now....

"I take statements that can't be supported, yet are defended by idiots."

This is patently untrue. You just choose to ignore the support, mangle but a small element of one's post, then attack it.

Not that hard to see, Nuke.

NUKE · « **Reply #230 on:** May 21, 2005, 04:43:24 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Nash
I've said this to you before every time you bring up your so-called IQ, and I'll say it again, for what it is worth. I have met many, many intelligent people and not once have they ever brought up their IQ. Conversely.....

Now....

"I take statements that can't be supported, yet are defended by idiots."

This is patently untrue. You just choose to ignore the support, mangle but a small element of one's post, then attack it.

Not that hard to see, Nuke.

You seem to express views, then refuse to explain why you have those views.

For instance, you said that you believe that the Iraq war was about oil, then refuse to explain why you believe that.

And, I never have told anyone in person what my IQ was.

Gixer · « **Reply #231 on:** May 21, 2005, 04:44:57 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by NUKE
I have a pretty high IQ, I am not stupid. You seem stupid.

That's the funniest statement I've seen on this forum for quite some time. So good I've added it to my sig. WTG Nuke.

Ah, if only Galloway was here to see this.

~~...-Gixer~~

NUKE · « **Reply #232 on:** May 21, 2005, 04:47:02 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Gixer

That's the funniest statement I've seen on this forum for quite some time. So good I've added it to my sig. WTG Nuke.

Ah, if only Galloway was here to see this.

~~...-Gixer~~

~~Have an orgasim Gixer. My Iq i probably a lot higher than yours.~~

culero · « **Reply #233 on:** May 21, 2005, 04:47:49 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by NUKE
snip
At least Nash has balls.

LMAO!

OK, 'fess up NUKE...you're just aching to lick 'em, ain't ya?

culero (balls! ROTF!)

Nash · « **Reply #234 on:** May 21, 2005, 04:49:00 PM »

Okay this is a perfect example.

You keep saying that I "believe that the Iraq war was about oil."

I don't remember saying that exactly. Maybe I did.

I know that I find it highly plausible, in light of the complete lack of substance shown for other possible reasons.

But if I did say that the war was about oil, and gave no explanation for it as you are suggesting, please point it out.

NUKE · « **Reply #235 on:** May 21, 2005, 04:53:19 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Nash
Okay this is a perfect example.

You keep saying that I "believe that the Iraq war was about oil."

I don't remember saying that exactly. Maybe I did.

I know that I find it highly plausible, in light of the complete lack of substance shown for other possible reasons.

But if I did say that the war was about oil, and gave no explanation for it as you are suggesting, please point it out.

Classic Nash. You did say that the war was about oil. I will post a quote if you like.

Even better Nash, do you think the war in Iraq was about oil? I'm asking you now, was the war against Iraq for oil?

Nash · « **Reply #236 on:** May 21, 2005, 04:55:47 PM »

Settle down a tad, Perry. By all means post what ya got.

NUKE · « **Reply #237 on:** May 21, 2005, 04:57:21 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Nash
Settle down a tad, Perry. By all means post what ya got.

I will post your quotes.

But for clarity, do you think the war against Iraq was for oil?

Nash · « **Reply #238 on:** May 21, 2005, 05:02:34 PM »

You know what?

Piss off.

You're saying that I've said that the war was about oil without ever explaning my position.

I don't know what the hell you think you're trying to prove here. Maybe I said that the war was about oil and didn't explain myself to you in a satisfactory way?

It's beyond confusing to me.

NUKE · « **Reply #239 on:** May 21, 2005, 05:05:28 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Nash
You know what?

Piss off.

You're saying that I've said that the war was about oil without ever explaning my position.

I don't know what the hell you think you're trying to prove here. Maybe I said that the war was about oil and didn't explain myself to you in a satisfactory way?

It's beyond confusing to me.

I guess you don't remeber your position from day to day.

You really need me to post your views? How shallow are your views that you need to be reminded of them?

Hey, let's clear it all up. Do you think the Iraq war was about oil?