Originally posted by Crumpp
You seem to be very selective in your facts Gripen.
I'm claiming very little in this thread. I'm merely pointing out that people seem to do unfounded claims against the data they don't like.
The 109 myths article contains several examples how the authors make claims about the tests they have not even read.
And you are making similar claims; as an example you have claimed that tested Fw 190s were crashed planes or that there was no adjustable cooling gills in the tested planes.
No one has claimed here that the A4/U8 is the same as A4 but if the racks are removed, it's quite close. As an example the tested top speed for the EB-104 (originally G-3) at FTH is according to report 415mph (668km/h) and that is about 50km/h more than the speed of the Focke Wulf tested Fw 190A-8 (WNr. 733705) at same power setting (with ETC 501 and unknown cooling fan).
Originally posted by BlauK
I suppose the point gripen was trying to make in the 109 issue was to always go after the original sources, but then in the 190 issue some book is much better than the original sources.
So what's your opinion; should I believe the report on that particular plane (PE882) and pictures showing the adjustable cooling gills. Or should I believe the parts list from Focke Wulf which gives no such option?
Originally posted by Kurfürst
LOL... like I`d say, wanna see my evidence behind my claims? Sure, I will give you. Take a plane, come here in Budapest, it`s *somewhere* in the the archives of the HTK...
Maybe I'll come one day, haven't been in Budapest since early nineties. BTW someone seem to have double standars here, I have at least claimed where to find the stuff.
gripen