Exactly.
Raider wants MG's to be "illegal" because it "prevents/deters/makes more difficult, additional North Hollywood type situations".
OK, Raider: All "civilian" MG's have to be registered and a special "Class 3" license has to be applied for and received in order for a "civilian" to own one.
There are many thousands of "civilians" in the US that have Class 3 MG's. Perhaps even tens of thousands of "civilians" with fully auto weapons.
So, as lasersailor pointed out, how many of these fully auto weapons that are LEGALLY held have been used in crimes like North Hollywood?
OTOH, how many ILLEGAL weapons are used in crimes? ALL the weapons used at North Hollywood were illegally owned AND most were illegally modified to full auto capability.
The obvious point is that "legal" MG's are not a problem in the US. They are registered and licensed and are rarely, if ever, used in crimes like North Hollywood.
So your "make MG's illegal" idea is more "feel good fluff" without meaning.
The legally held MG's in the US can be shown to be no factor in our crime stats.
It's ILLEGALLY held/modified weapons that are a problem and, by definition, they are ALREADY ILLEGAL so some useless new law would be highly unlikely to change the situation.
Your solution merely denies the rights of law-abiding gun owners while doing NOTHING to prevent "North Hollywood" type crimes.
How typical of the "feel good" brigade.