« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 161 162 163 [164] 165 166 167 ... 172   Go Down

Author Topic: B-29 Super Fortress  (Read 96814 times)

Offline lilsquid

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 123
Re: B-29 Super Fortress
« Reply #2445 on: July 06, 2010, 01:19:36 PM »
Logged
Freedom is strangely ephemeral. It is something like breathing; one only becomes acutely aware of its importance when one is choking. - William E. Simon

Offline whipster22

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 458
Re: B-29 Super Fortress
« Reply #2446 on: July 06, 2010, 01:25:13 PM »
only if we add the Ki-109 to counter  :P
Logged
just dewbing up the bbs
baby seal

Offline StokesAk

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3665
Re: B-29 Super Fortress
« Reply #2447 on: July 06, 2010, 01:25:37 PM »
Rubber Duckies cant fly
« Last Edit: July 06, 2010, 01:28:09 PM by StokesAk »
Logged
Strokes

Offline crazierthanu

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 780
Re: B-29 Super Fortress
« Reply #2448 on: July 06, 2010, 01:26:16 PM »
Quote from: lilsquid on July 06, 2010, 01:19:36 PM
Show me this to never seen it
There have been sooo many B-29 threads in the past years. Hitech has always came in and said no. He even created a BBS chat filter to change B-29 to "rubber ducky".  :lol

Im not going to search anything for you. its not that hard to find, there is even a 163 page thread about it.
Logged
80th FS "Headhunters"
EhFex in-game.
S.A.P.P.- Secret Association Of P-38 Pilots (Lightning in a Bottle)

Offline 1Boner

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2285
Re: B-29 Super Fortress
« Reply #2449 on: July 06, 2010, 01:50:26 PM »
I think I've heard him say no to the nuke, but can't recall him saying no to the plane.
Logged
"Life is just as deadly as it looks"  Richard Thompson

"So umm.... just to make sure I have this right.  What you are asking is for the bombers carrying bombs, to stop dropping bombs on the bombs, so the bombers can carry bombs to bomb things with?"  AKP

Offline guncrasher

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 17361
Re: B-29 Super Fortress
« Reply #2450 on: July 06, 2010, 03:21:35 PM »
He has said no a zillion times (zillion + 1 now). He said if he was to add it then people would then start a "have the nuke" thread.  Besides somehing about he would perk it so high nobody would have enough perkies.  Why not wish get rid of the arena caps.  That would happen first.


Semp
Logged
you dont want me to ho, dont point your plane at me.

Offline 1Boner

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2285
Re: B-29 Super Fortress
« Reply #2451 on: July 06, 2010, 04:23:56 PM »
Quote from: guncrasher on July 06, 2010, 03:21:35 PM
He has said no a zillion times
Semp

A Zillion???

Thats ALOT!!! :O
Logged
"Life is just as deadly as it looks"  Richard Thompson

"So umm.... just to make sure I have this right.  What you are asking is for the bombers carrying bombs, to stop dropping bombs on the bombs, so the bombers can carry bombs to bomb things with?"  AKP

Offline ImADot

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6215
Re: B-29 Super Fortress
« Reply #2452 on: July 06, 2010, 04:27:03 PM »
Settle down Squiddie...

It seems you're getting a bit restless; the meds wearing off?    :rolleyes:
Logged
My Current Rig:
GigaByte GA-X99-UD4 Mobo w/ 16Gb RAM
Intel i7 5820k, Win7 64-bit
NVidia GTX 970 4Gb ACX 2.0
Track IR, CH Fighterstick, CH Pro Throttle, CH Pro Pedals

Offline Plazus

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2868
Re: B-29 Super Fortress
« Reply #2453 on: July 06, 2010, 04:36:50 PM »
lilsquid,

The search bar at the top of the forums page works wonders. Use it.
Logged
Plazus
80th FS "Headhunters"
Axis vs Allies

Offline Bronk

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9044
Re: B-29 Super Fortress
« Reply #2454 on: July 06, 2010, 05:18:07 PM »
Quote from: crazierthanu on July 06, 2010, 01:26:16 PM
There have been sooo many B-29 threads in the past years. Hitech has always came in and said no. He even created a BBS chat filter to change B-29 to "rubber ducky".  :lol

Im not going to search anything for you. its not that hard to find, there is even a 163 page thread about it.
Umm no he didn't and it was the skuzzy that did the filter.
Logged
See Rule #4

Offline uptown

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8566
Re: B-29 Super Fortress
« Reply #2455 on: July 06, 2010, 05:45:50 PM »
Squidkid wishes for things but doesn't even play the game anymore.  :rolleyes:
Logged
Lighten up Francis

Offline oakranger

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8380
      • http://www.slybirds.com/
Re: B-29 Super Fortress
« Reply #2456 on: July 06, 2010, 06:03:10 PM »
Logged
Oaktree

56th Fighter group

Offline Greziz

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 206
Re: B-29 Super Fortress
« Reply #2457 on: July 06, 2010, 06:14:44 PM »
I think it is funny that we have friggen jets but not the end of the war awesome bomber. I mean really we have JETS JETS JETS JETS! Why would a prop bomber be so feared?
Logged

Offline IrishOne

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1529
Re: B-29 Super Fortress
« Reply #2458 on: July 06, 2010, 06:31:07 PM »
Logged
-AoM-

Offline olds442

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2239
Re: B-29 Super Fortress
« Reply #2459 on: July 06, 2010, 06:34:44 PM »
Quote from: Greziz on July 06, 2010, 06:14:44 PM
I think it is funny that we have friggen jets but not the end of the war awesome bomber. I mean really we have JETS JETS JETS JETS! Why would a prop bomber be so feared?
lets see


very fast (i think like 350mph not sure)

bombload awesome(yes even without the nuke :neener:)

guns: look this guns are radio controled not maned(no PWs in gunners) and are small so its hard to take them out and its got a 20MM cannon in the tail

if i where a 262 i would be scared
Logged
Quote from: Skuzzy on August 18, 2014, 09:54:22 AM
only a moron would use Dolby positioning in a game.
IGN: cutlass "shovels and rakes and implements of destruction"
Pages: 1 ... 161 162 163 [164] 165 166 167 ... 172   Go Up
« previous next »