Author Topic: I would like the B-29  (Read 5762 times)

Offline bkbandit

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 682
I would like the B-29
« Reply #105 on: April 07, 2006, 09:12:09 AM »
to put a atom bomb(nuclear didnt come out till later) it would completly change the way the game is played.  HTC would probably make it retarded hard to get one if they even put it in.  It would be tooo much of a pain in the bellybutton to make it fit in the game play.  The b29 was a powerful bomber without the nuke and i think all you guys are forgeting that.  Look at the b52, it was intended to drop the nuclear bomb but never did.  The thing still rains terror on wat ever it flys over till this day. Dont forget that b9 droped incedairys and burned down 20 something citys in japan.  Those attacks killed way more people then the atom bombs.



To have the atom bomb htc would have to regulate it to the point where there might be a 25% chance that 1 is dropped on each map.  You would have to make it a group purchase and take x amount of perk points from a mass amount of players.  Then only allow one every x amount of hours. I think it would be a pain in the bellybutton to add it. Theres more things that the game needs before you consider the atom bomb.  Like the b29 it self.

Offline MobiusAC

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 27
      • http://www.66thhellcats.com
I would like the B-29
« Reply #106 on: April 07, 2006, 09:36:27 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by bkbandit
Dont forget that b9 droped incedairys and burned down 20 something citys in japan.  Those attacks killed way more people then the atom bombs.



umm... NO!

Atom bombs killed more people then you think.  Don't forget about those  millions of people who suffered radiation posioning and died becuase of those atomb bombs.


Only better then an Atom bomb is a Hydrogen Bomb.

Offline bkbandit

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 682
I would like the B-29
« Reply #107 on: April 07, 2006, 10:35:04 AM »
it dont take a master mind to noe that.   You can argue that the atom bomb did alot more then kill people but thats a different post all together.

Offline MobiusAC

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 27
      • http://www.66thhellcats.com
I would like the B-29
« Reply #108 on: April 07, 2006, 01:13:27 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by bkbandit
it dont take a master mind to noe that.



So either you're just going against your previous post or you don't know what your talking about.

Offline Brenjen

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1514
I would like the B-29
« Reply #109 on: April 07, 2006, 01:35:40 PM »
The incendiary attacks caused more square miles of damage & killed more people outright than the atomic attacks did. But isn't that a little off topic? I for one would like to see every vehicle & weapon used in WWII incorporated into a game but it isn't going to happen with AHII. It's too complex a task & would create a game that was too complex to enjoy in the AHII framework. So; that leaves the higher ups in the position to decide what to add & what not to add for a good balance of playability & consumer enjoyment vs. profit & loss; they have to draw a line somewhere don't they? I for one would not mind the B-29 in this particular game if atomic weapons were not in the equation (sp?); in my opinion it wouldn't be long before the maps shown earlier did happen & people would get angry & leave & that just wouldn't be good for HTC. I for one want them to prosper as a company & continue to develop better fun for me.

 So I say, perked B-29's would be ok for me as a paying customer.
But atomic weapons would be a horrible addition to it's payload.

Offline bkbandit

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 682
I would like the B-29
« Reply #110 on: April 07, 2006, 09:53:22 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by MobiusAC
So either you're just going against your previous post or you don't know what your talking about.



Reading is fun aint it, if you pay attention to wat you read you dont hav to ask many questions.


Brenjen sumed it up perfectly.  Ur talking about the effects of the a bomb after it was droped.  Im pretty sure htc isnt going to have your pilot develope cancer.   A perked b29 would do the game good.  Just load it up with regular bombs.  Picking the a bomb in the game is a pain in the ass.

Offline MobiusAC

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 27
      • http://www.66thhellcats.com
I would like the B-29
« Reply #111 on: April 08, 2006, 01:19:48 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by bkbandit
Reading is fun aint it, if you pay attention to wat you read you dont hav to ask many questions.


Brenjen sumed it up perfectly.  Ur talking about the effects of the a bomb after it was droped.  Im pretty sure htc isnt going to have your pilot develope cancer.   A perked b29 would do the game good.  Just load it up with regular bombs.  Picking the a bomb in the game is a pain in the ass.


I am going to drop this because you make no sense.  You would come across sounding like an intelligence person; if you would take the time to spell check your responses.  Maybe if you read what I wrote you would understand.

I never verbally or wrote out in text requesting for HiTech to add the atomic bomb to Aces High II.

Quote
Originally posted by bkbandit
Those attacks killed way more people then the atom bombs.


The incendiary attacks had about 100,000 more Japanese civilians that were killed, than died in the Hiroshima atomic bombing.  You clearly stated that more people died from both Hiroshima's atomic bombing and Nagasaki's atomic bombing.  Apparently that is not true based on historical facts.

Oh, and I agree with Brenjen on the statement that it would be nice to have HiTech incorporate every vehicle and weapon used in World War II.