Originally posted by Oldman731
That scenario isn't Galland. He was bombing and strafing Spaniards long before WWII started.
As Charon pointed out several years ago, there's an inherent irony in saying that the German flyers were just defending their country. Right: defending it over Madrid, Warsaw, Holland, Norway, Belgium, France, England, Yugoslavia, Greece, Africa....
- oldman
Actually I with that point I was more responding to the post Westy made.
As for Galland and the other fliers.
They were professional soldiers and they were doing what they were told to do.
Just as right or wrong our soldiers are doing now.
Thing too is a countries leader. Doesn't matter who it is can do almost anything and retain the support of the people so long as that country remains prosperous and highly successful at whatever it is they are doing.
Had we stormed through Iraq, Had there been no insurgence and all was peaceful there now Bush would have far more support then he does now.
In fact he could have gone into Syria, Iran and on and on and on and so long as the overwhelming success held up So would the support.
Look at Clinton. Certainly no gem of a president either. But he happened to be there during highly prosperous times and thus he maintained a fairly high level of support no matter what he did
So long as Germany was prosperous and remained highly successful he maintained a high popularity.
Once the successes became fewer and they started having setback after setback the popularity begins to wane.
People like to be associated with the winning team. Doesn't matter what the team is doing to win so long as its winning people will support it.
Once the team is loosing people abandon and will turn on it and even switch sides just to be associated with the winning side.
You can see this very effect in action almost nightly in the MA