Author Topic: New Hydrogen Breakthrough?  (Read 769 times)

Offline FUNKED1

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6866
      • http://soldatensender.blogspot.com/
New Hydrogen Breakthrough?
« Reply #15 on: May 23, 2006, 06:06:07 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Nifty
nice avatar Mak!  :)  Go Vincent!


Vincent is a *****.

Offline Brenjen

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1514
New Hydrogen Breakthrough?
« Reply #16 on: May 23, 2006, 06:13:24 PM »
There have been a butt load of people running their vehicles on used cooking oil for years, what is in the exhaust off of that stuff?

Offline LePaul

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7988
New Hydrogen Breakthrough?
« Reply #17 on: May 23, 2006, 06:23:20 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by FUNKED1
Vincent is a *****.


LOL Maximillian!

Everyone knows R2's rock  :)

Offline Hangtime

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10148
New Hydrogen Breakthrough?
« Reply #18 on: May 23, 2006, 06:24:39 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Skuzzy
This is not new and has been invented by several people, in one form or another.  The latest being some guy from Colorado who claims his Honda runs on water and breaks down the water, in real time, to run the car.  No gasoline needed.
He claims it gets a couple hundred miles per gallon of water, and the exhaust contains nothing harmful to the environment.


In unrelated news, distilled water prices in central colorado today hit a new high, topping 12 dollars a gallon...
The price of Freedom is the willingness to do sudden battle, anywhere, any time and with utter recklessness...

...at home, or abroad.

Offline Holden McGroin

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8591
New Hydrogen Breakthrough?
« Reply #19 on: May 23, 2006, 09:47:34 PM »
The best reported efficeincy for electrolysis under laboratory conditions is about 95%, or the energy within the hydrogen produced is 5% less than the energy put into the process.

Getting better than 95% is going to be difficult due to the 2nd law of thermodynamics and that nasty always increasing entropy thing.  In any conversion process, energy in must be greater than energy received.

Most industrial processes are probably lucky to get 50%.

Ain't nobody gunna run their car on water.
Holden McGroin LLC makes every effort to provide accurate and complete information. Since humor, irony, and keen insight may be foreign to some readers, no warranty, expressed or implied is offered. Re-writing this disclaimer cost me big bucks at the lawyer’s office!

Offline Vulcan

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9891
New Hydrogen Breakthrough?
« Reply #20 on: May 23, 2006, 10:11:08 PM »
Bridges... get yer cheap bridges.... going for a song....

Offline xNOVAx

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 811
New Hydrogen Breakthrough?
« Reply #21 on: May 23, 2006, 10:13:27 PM »
Gah.. apparently nobody watched the friggen video.. nevermind my posting of this..


NOVA - Army of Muppets - Inactive

"When once you have tasted flight, you will forever walk the earth with your eyes turned skyward, for there you have been, and there you will always long to return." -Leonardo da Vinci

Offline rpm

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15661
New Hydrogen Breakthrough?
« Reply #22 on: May 23, 2006, 10:20:31 PM »
And there was this guy in Vernon, Texas that built a cold fission reactor in his garage...
My mind is a raging torrent, flooded with rivulets of thought cascading into a waterfall of creative alternatives.
Stay thirsty my friends.

Offline lazs2

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 24886
New Hydrogen Breakthrough?
« Reply #23 on: May 24, 2006, 09:06:08 AM »
the real key is cheap or free electricity   As holden points out... that is what is needed to make hydrogen cars worthwhile.

lazs

Offline lukster

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2581
New Hydrogen Breakthrough?
« Reply #24 on: May 24, 2006, 09:27:54 AM »
I watched the video, was very interesting. The guys claim that they can generate about 1,700 liters (or was it 17,000) of aquagen every hour at about $.70/hr. They also said that it's use in their car reduced the gasoline consumption by about 50%. If their report is true, this could be very big.


Can't find the video now, maybe it was a farce and CNN dropped it.

Or, maybe, the oil companies destroyed it and killed everyone in the company and are looking for everyone that watched it. I never really believed those guys, honest. ;)
« Last Edit: May 24, 2006, 09:36:11 AM by lukster »

Offline lukster

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2581
New Hydrogen Breakthrough?
« Reply #25 on: May 24, 2006, 10:39:11 AM »
I suspect the guys in the video may have meant they are producing this fuel at $.70 per liter but I don't think that's what they said. Here's an interesting article on the fuel.

http://www.blazelabs.com/n-aquagen.asp

Offline Goomba

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 331
New Hydrogen Breakthrough?
« Reply #26 on: May 24, 2006, 11:46:51 AM »
I'm afraid I might disagree with a point;

Hydrogen is most definitely a powerful energy source...and the most plentiful in the Universe.  The Hindenburg reference is right on point...that's pure energy release from combusting hydrogen.  In fact, it has a very high energy density, which is one of the reasons it's attractive as an energy source;  a plentiful fuel with low energy density is bulky, inefficient and inconvenient.

It does not act like a battery...it does not 'store' energy in that sense, and does not take energy input from another source.

Fuel cell development is progressing quite well, as far as I can tell, and test fleets are rolling as we speak.

I see two major hurdles to this otherwise very good fuel source;

1)  As Holden points out, we need an improvement in the means by which we can aquire H2.  While it is the most common element in the Universe, it does not exist on Earth (for the most part) in it's elemental form.

2)  We need a new distribution infrastructure to move the fuel from production to end user.  This is a big ticket item, no doubt.  However, when oil was discovered in plentiful quantities and commercial uses for it were developed, there was no distribution infrastructure.  Now, there is.  Clearly, market demand and current technology can make this an entirely realistic effort.  Imagine the costs of an infrastructure building program weighed against the benefits of energy independence and massively reduced emissions...

I still consider hydrogen/fuel cells to be the most legitimate, long-term, environmentally responsible solution to the current global energy situation, when the aformentioned issues are addressed.

The best part would be marginalizing those homicidal lunatics in the Middle East by nearly eliminating demand for their one and only product.

Offline vorticon

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7935
New Hydrogen Breakthrough?
« Reply #27 on: May 24, 2006, 12:10:48 PM »
hydrogen fuel cell just runs an electric motor right? so the only thing making it more likable than electricity is it weighs less than batteries...why not use it for straight combustion?


of course, you could just give a smaller amount for researching recovery from oil shale (which iirc, you have several billion barrels locked up in) and tell the middle east to keep there filthy oil.

Offline Holden McGroin

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8591
New Hydrogen Breakthrough?
« Reply #28 on: May 24, 2006, 04:27:22 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Goomba
I'm afraid I might disagree with a point;

Hydrogen is most definitely a powerful energy source...and the most plentiful in the Universe.  The Hindenburg reference is right on point...that's pure energy release from combusting hydrogen.  In fact, it has a very high energy density, which is one of the reasons it's attractive as an energy source;  a plentiful fuel with low energy density is bulky, inefficient and inconvenient.

It does not act like a battery...it does not 'store' energy in that sense, and does not take energy input from another source.


If one electrolises water, it takes more energy to seperate the hydrogen from the water than exists in the hydrogen produced.

Hydrogen (seperated from water) is the stored energy of the production process. Water is the "ash" of a hydrogen oxygen combustion. You must replace the energy of the fire in order to seperate the elements.

If one seperates hydrogen from hydrocarbons, burning the hydrocarbon directly would yeild more heat than burning the seperated hydrogen.

The if you burned the stuff it took to produce the hydrogen in the Hindenburg, you could have destroyed Lakehurst NJ, not just an airship.
« Last Edit: May 24, 2006, 04:33:34 PM by Holden McGroin »
Holden McGroin LLC makes every effort to provide accurate and complete information. Since humor, irony, and keen insight may be foreign to some readers, no warranty, expressed or implied is offered. Re-writing this disclaimer cost me big bucks at the lawyer’s office!

Offline Debonair

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3488
New Hydrogen Breakthrough?
« Reply #29 on: May 24, 2006, 04:57:05 PM »
not true if you take the H2 & put it in a fusion bomb.  your alternative fuel enviro-car will be teh fast also