Author Topic: Yak7B/Yak7M105PF/Yak9D/Yak1B/Yak3/Yak9UT (perked) (Read 2205 times)

straffo · « **on:** May 29, 2006, 04:57:30 AM »

YakYakYakYakYakYakYakYakYakYa kYakYakYakYak !!!!

Yak 1B :

Yak9D

Yak 3:

straffo · « **Reply #1 on:** May 29, 2006, 05:04:45 AM »

You forgot the 9M say one of little voices I've in my head.

Sikboy · « **Reply #2 on:** May 29, 2006, 09:04:41 AM »

Uh Oh, I'm going to need a few minutes alone.

And a box of tissue.

Though really I would be happy with just the Yak-1, 9M and 9-UT.

I'm not picky.... Oh what the hell, add the Moskit!

-Sik

mussie · « **Reply #3 on:** May 29, 2006, 09:16:30 AM »

The UT had a 37mm and two 20's right.....

Mmmmmmmmmmmm Hi-caliber desruction.....

thndregg · « **Reply #4 on:** May 29, 2006, 09:28:40 AM »

I suppose I'd better do some reading to form an opinion.

straffo · « **Reply #5 on:** May 29, 2006, 09:34:03 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by Sikboy
I'm not picky.... Oh what the hell, add the Moskit!

is it the Yak 1 M ?

TexMurphy · « **Reply #6 on:** May 29, 2006, 10:16:27 AM »

I really hope that we get the full line of Yak´s once the Yak9s are due for remake...

all of the versions listed here where made in significant numbers except the UT... but the UT would be a great addition to the perk plane lineup..

If we get the line of Yaks, a Mig3 and a LaGG3 we are pretty much set when it comes to russian fighters.

Adding all these Yaks shouldnt be much extra work when remodeling the 9T and 9U as they are relativly similar in shape.

LaGG3 could easily be added with when the LaLas get remade..

When this is done we can finally run AvA RPSes, Scenarios and Snapshots on the eastern front that actually feature russian planes.

As it is today its pretty rediculous when all Russian planes are either British or American.

Tex

Sikboy · « **Reply #7 on:** May 29, 2006, 10:57:30 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by straffo
is it the Yak 1 M ?

Straffo,

Sorry, I seem to have lost my Yak book in the divorce settlement (I seem to have lost a lot of these things in the divorce).

You're right, the Moskit was the 1M, I was thinking they kept the nickname for the Yak-3, but I think I'm wrong on that.

As for the future of the Yaks... I'm pretty positive we'll get the 9M when they re-do the model. I'm hopeful that we'll get the 9UT, but I'm not holding my breath. The 9UT in game will cause a big fight here at the house when I try to convince wife 2.0 that I should get my X-45 out of storage.

-Sik

Tilt · « **Reply #8 on:** May 30, 2006, 05:14:48 PM »

The Cross of Lorraine never flew over Russia........it was added after the NN returned to France. (but then you know that Straffo!!)

The UT (2 x B20 + 1 x NS37) was tested as late as March 45 and only then ordered for production (282 were made but its not clear how many before the war end) If we count the August Manchurian campaign then it should qualify..............

The Yak3 would be an MA favourite IMO...

Yak9D is a must for scenarios it sits square beside the La5FN in a post Kursk plane set.

straffo · « **Reply #9 on:** May 30, 2006, 05:36:24 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Tilt
The Cross of Lorraine never flew over Russia........it was added after the NN returned to France. (but then you know that Straffo!!)

I plead guilty your honor

Sikboy, condolence and congrats for your divorce

I've been unable to get a proper reference for the Moskit (my library is quite a mess) but I'm almost (perhaps) pretty (un)sure it was the nickname of the Yak 1M

Sikboy · « **Reply #10 on:** May 30, 2006, 06:44:17 PM »

Straffo,

You're correct. I was just getting itchy lol.

-Sik

Jebus · « **Reply #11 on:** May 30, 2006, 06:45:28 PM »

They all look the same to me.

Krusty · « **Reply #12 on:** May 30, 2006, 06:50:06 PM »

Most of them fly the same, too. There's very little need for 10 identical yaks. One might make an argument for a special armament variant, like the UT, but D vs T the difference is minimal.

Sikboy · « **Reply #13 on:** May 30, 2006, 07:02:34 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Krusty
Most of them fly the same, too. There's very little need for 10 identical yaks. One might make an argument for a special armament variant, like the UT, but D vs T the difference is minimal.

D v. T is pretty significant since the T has the 37mm and the D doesn't.

As far as flying the same, the Yak-3 is unlike any other Yak. From that point of view, it would be a good model.

-Sik

Treize69 · « **Reply #14 on:** May 30, 2006, 07:24:09 PM »

I can see the Yak-1 so we have more options early war, but I have to agree that we don't really need a half dozen nearly identical aircraft added when there are so many different aircraft from the same theater and point in the war(LaGG-3, MiG-3, I-16, IAR, Buffalo, etc.) that need to be done too.