Author Topic: what we need is more cool vehicles! (Read 2655 times)

taylortanklover · « **Reply #75 on:** September 04, 2006, 12:38:54 PM »

hey u ********** read steve's signature! i think he is really right there!

taylortanklover · « **Reply #76 on:** September 04, 2006, 12:40:46 PM »

i type fast but softly, so when i hit a key it does not read it on the text! so do not pick on me any more just for dumb type-os, u ****** ******s!

nirvana · « **Reply #77 on:** September 04, 2006, 01:24:21 PM »

You talk big for a newer fellow on these boards Taylor, take my advice and calm down or you might see your welcome run out quite fast. You actually kinda remind me of Todd420/Autopilot...

bj229r · « **Reply #78 on:** September 04, 2006, 02:11:37 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by taylortanklover
no actually, if a sherman was hit and inoperatabale but not destroied, the could fix it up and it will be running again in no time! the actual cool thing is if a sherman was destroied it could be replaced with in 48 hours for the germans it took like a month! the less we hade to deal with them!:D

Yes...after they had hosed off the remains of the previous inhabitants:huh

bj229r · « **Reply #79 on:** September 04, 2006, 02:22:31 PM »

Does the term "Troll" occur to anyone?

Lye-El · « **Reply #80 on:** September 04, 2006, 07:49:48 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by taylortanklover
i type fast but softly, so when i hit a key it does not read it on the text! so do not pick on me any more just for dumb type-os, u ****** ******s!

Did anybody say anything about about your lack of capitalization or sentence structure? Does your Mom know you type with those fingers?

Meatwad · « **Reply #81 on:** September 04, 2006, 07:52:26 PM »

SHADE!!!

Autopilot returns!!!

nirvana · « **Reply #82 on:** September 04, 2006, 11:05:19 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Meatwad
SHADE!!!

Autopilot returns!!!

BURN HIM!

SAS_KID · « **Reply #83 on:** September 11, 2006, 09:15:42 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by nirvana
BURN HIM!

I got the mob rounded up for the fun. I even got my custom made hydro turbine powered torch with the candle light power of 1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000. (WOOT!) And my special pitchfork with shooting blades that get replaced after being shot. In additon, it is capable of hitting those runners from 100 yards out.
Brought to you by *Revoulutionary Mob weapons R'us*

Masherbrum · « **Reply #84 on:** September 12, 2006, 12:04:22 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by taylortanklover
nope, ur wrong about the matireal part! i remember that the germans did not call it that but some thing else that related to a lighter! Sence the M4 hade an auto-mobile engine it's fuel is what a car takes and that is highly flameable (more flameable than desiel!), and along with it's very thin armor so uselly one hit would light it on fire! that is why the germans named it after a lighter! But on aces high a t-34 agains a panzer 4 one hit to eather of them and u r back to the tower, even though the panzer 4 has a weaker gun than the T-34 they both can only take one hit! So if u put a sherman in there it wouldn't change the total hits taken to destroy it!:D

Wrong. It WAS nicknamed the "Ronson Lighter" BY THE GERMANS, or the "Tommycooker" by the British.

Quote

Originally posted by taylortanklover
u r wrong cause the shermans engine wass a ford 500 horse power it was not of a gm truck i have a book to prove it!

Wrong. The M4A2 of which EagleDNY referred to, HAD the GM 6046 2x6 engines. The M4A4 had the Chrysler A57 5xL6 engines in a star pattern. Only the M4A3W, M4A3E2 "Jumbo" and the M4A3E8(76)W "Easy Eight" had the Ford.

Quote

Originally posted by E25280
Best examples to illustrate are the 75mm gun on the Panther and the British 17lbr gun(76mm IIRC) both had more armor penetration power than the 88mm on the Tiger I.

Close enough Brauno, the Q17 pounder was 76.2mm.

Quote

Originally posted by justfreds
someone take the keyboard from this retard ^^^^^^^^^^

So true.

FrodeMk3 · « **Reply #85 on:** September 12, 2006, 12:43:17 AM »

Fellas, I've seen taylortanklover posting on other threads on the AH boards, and I've noticed the sherman get mentioned in those, too. Now, alot of people on those threads have been thinking troll, somebody even mentioned his spelling is similiar to HiTech's, and that he might be trolling in a shade. Fine...but, why the fixation with the M-4? If I may, I would like to hazard a guess that (1.)If it is HTC, and he's either polling/feeling the water about a specific vehicle, like the M-4, MAYBE that means that one is in the works.(2.)He might want to do another GV(My guess is, it's easier to model than an airplane, kinda to give us a bone while working on Combat Tour, and he's looking for info/input to help.(3.) ttl is what he seems, and really needs a stern talking-to by the Board Moderator...

Draw your own conclusions...

(P.S...Not that I would mind seeing the sherman in the game, But not in the guise of some overmodeled P.O.S. that is nothing like the original.)

taylortanklover · « **Reply #86 on:** September 12, 2006, 06:54:40 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by Masherbrum
Wrong. It WAS nicknamed the "Ronson Lighter" BY THE GERMANS, or the "Tommycooker" by the British.

Wrong. The M4A2 of which EagleDNY referred to, HAD the GM 6046 2x6 engines. The M4A4 had the Chrysler A57 5xL6 engines in a star pattern. Only the M4A3W, M4A3E2 "Jumbo" and the M4A3E8(76)W "Easy Eight" had the Ford.

Close enough Brauno, the Q17 pounder was 76.2mm.

So true.

okay is it just me or did a guy that drove a sherman (american), said that the americans called it a romnsen, and the germans the tommycooker (they spoke it in german we just translated it)!!!!! i am not that stupid u dumb-dumb!

Masherbrum · « **Reply #87 on:** September 12, 2006, 06:56:21 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by taylortanklover
okay is it just me or did a guy that drove a sherman (american), said that the americans called it a romnsen, and the germans the tommycooker (they spoke it in german we just translated it)!!!!! i am not that stupid u dumb-dumb!

You are wrong. GO get an edumacation and stop posting. You know NOTHING.

taylortanklover · « **Reply #88 on:** September 12, 2006, 06:58:06 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by FrodeMk3
Fellas, I've seen taylortanklover posting on other threads on the AH boards, and I've noticed the sherman get mentioned in those, too. Now, alot of people on those threads have been thinking troll, somebody even mentioned his spelling is similiar to HiTech's, and that he might be trolling in a shade. Fine...but, why the fixation with the M-4? If I may, I would like to hazard a guess that (1.)If it is HTC, and he's either polling/feeling the water about a specific vehicle, like the M-4, MAYBE that means that one is in the works.(2.)He might want to do another GV(My guess is, it's easier to model than an airplane, kinda to give us a bone while working on Combat Tour, and he's looking for info/input to help.(3.) ttl is what he seems, and really needs a stern talking-to by the Board Moderator...

Draw your own conclusions...

(P.S...Not that I would mind seeing the sherman in the game, But not in the guise of some overmodeled P.O.S. that is nothing like the original.)

what the hell did u just say? english please!

okay i may have fished out some of it and those i agree but i am just a normal person with special abilaties (adhd and like to hear my self talk), but i have the same rights as everyone else so stop picking on me!

Masherbrum · « **Reply #89 on:** September 12, 2006, 07:03:53 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by taylortanklover
what the hell did u just say? english please!

We're seeing through your BS.