Whoever said anything about the US being the sole protagonist in this? Don't forget there are RAF pilots flying over Iraq right now.
The US stance is supported by the UK, and in fact all the other countries on the security council are against the continuing embargo on humanitarian aid.
There is no UN mandate for over-flying Iraq. Although I personally have no problem with the no-fly-zones being enforced.
But what about the Turkish planes that are being used to attack the Kurds in the North? Do we take action against them?No, we welcome them into NATO.
BTW, unlike many who post here, I believe it is quite acceptable to criticise your own government.
Ever hear of Oil for Food?
But why hand a propaganda victory on a plate to Saddam? This embargo on humanitarian aid defeats its objective - to make his people rise against him.
What actually happens is that Saddam steals the money and blames the shortages on the US/UK - isolated, his people hate the outside world. We are storing up problems for the future.
...accountable for nothing other than your own selfishness...
I've donated to MAIC, so at least I don't just sit back and apathetically accept the situation. It's not much, but it's better than nothing.
Of course, you would be happier if Saddam had the capability to kill US pilots...
I'm very sorry. Did I miss something? Since when did medical supplies equate to SAMs and ZSUs? Please enlighten me. And why would I want Saddam to be able to attack RAF or US planes? Please explain that to me.
BTW, I'd rather be young and idealistic, than old, apathetic and defeated.
[This message has been edited by Dowding (edited 02-16-2001).]