The problem is players falsely implying that other players' victories were due to gunnery and not flying skill. Like I said, if you don't want to hand out a compliment, don't. Now, saying "good shooting" is very much like saying, "Your flying wasn't worth mentioning but that was some good gunnery." Obviously, then, saying "good shooting" when the outcome of the fight was in fact determined by gunnery rather than flying skill is not the problem. But saying "good shooting" when the fight wasn't won by shooting but by excellent flying is deceitful.
For an extreme example, I can think of a time when a talented flier, "Joe," fought a less skilled player, "Ronny." Joe out-maneuvered Ronny in a fair fight, getting behind Ronny right away and staying there, but took a long time to finish him because of Joe's poor gunnery. After the fight, Ronny said, "good shooting." But it was obvious to me and everyone who saw the fight that it wasn't good shooting, it was bad shooting and great flying. Ronny was not being quite honest there; he handed out a false compliment to avoid giving out a real one. He didn't want to admit he was out-maneuvered in a fair fight, so he made it sound as if Ronny had simply gotten in a lucky shot or head-on pass.
If that situation is good with you, Hubsonfire, then I'll just squelch you if ever I see you in the game, because I don't deal with rude and dishonest players. If that's not the case, however, then I don't see why you apparently disagree with me here. Or is it that you just like to jump on me whenever you see me because of past disagreements about airplanes and countries? At any rate, I don't think I need to say a whole lot more here. My point has been made quite clearly (reduntantly, even), and anyone of integrity will recognize its value. Those who won't, won't, and nothing I say will change that.