Author Topic: Do you consider this acceptable?  (Read 4206 times)

Offline NOT

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 780
Do you consider this acceptable?
« Reply #30 on: March 08, 2007, 02:37:02 PM »
Nexus, your fishin in the wrong pond, move along please.:noid



NOT



AKNOT

Offline nexus69

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 108
      • http://www.708th.com
Do you consider this acceptable?
« Reply #31 on: March 08, 2007, 02:54:13 PM »
See Rule #4
« Last Edit: March 08, 2007, 03:29:24 PM by Skuzzy »

Offline FrodeMk3

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2481
Do you consider this acceptable?
« Reply #32 on: March 08, 2007, 02:54:42 PM »
Not's right. Disagree or agree, Nexus, the AK's are simply trying to help make the MA's work. I would note, though, that they would probably have stayed on one country, and flown together as one squad(Which i'm sure they would much rather do) If the arena's had never split. Say that one MA was a slum all you want, We've got multiple slums now. The EW and MW get milkrunned' by squads looking for scores, and we have unbalance in the LW's. If the AK's are trying to balance, then so be it.

Offline nexus69

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 108
      • http://www.708th.com
Re: Re: Do you consider this acceptable?
« Reply #33 on: March 08, 2007, 02:59:16 PM »
See Rule #5
« Last Edit: March 08, 2007, 03:29:11 PM by Skuzzy »

Offline nexus69

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 108
      • http://www.708th.com
Do you consider this acceptable?
« Reply #34 on: March 08, 2007, 03:00:29 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by FrodeMk3
Not's right. Disagree or agree, Nexus, the AK's are simply trying to help make the MA's work. I would note, though, that they would probably have stayed on one country, and flown together as one squad(Which i'm sure they would much rather do) If the arena's had never split. Say that one MA was a slum all you want, We've got multiple slums now. The EW and MW get milkrunned' by squads looking for scores, and we have unbalance in the LW's. If the AK's are trying to balance, then so be it.




Did I mention anyones name, or squad name? I don't remember.

Offline Bronk

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9044
Do you consider this acceptable?
« Reply #35 on: March 08, 2007, 03:02:05 PM »
LMAO
This thread has it all.
The split arena dead horse whine was the  cherry on top.

:rofl :rofl :rofl


Bronk
See Rule #4

Offline NOT

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 780
Do you consider this acceptable?
« Reply #36 on: March 08, 2007, 03:08:16 PM »
NOT(large letters so you can understand) to be rude, but my understanding of this thread is that you are whining because someone is NOT playing the way YOU do. Not everyone plays the same way. Some like to take bases, some furball, some switch sides for balance, some have a loyalty to one side or the other. Is any of that  right or wrong, who cares, pay your $15 a month and play the way you want, and let others do the same. :aok

and thaits all i got to say abouut thait.



NOT



AKNOT

Offline kamilyun

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1467
Do you consider this acceptable?
« Reply #37 on: March 08, 2007, 03:10:21 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Bronk
LMAO
This thread has it all.
The split arena dead horse whine was the  cherry on top.

:rofl :rofl :rofl


Bronk


I disagree.  We are missing a hijack to a totally unrelated "dead horse" whine such as warping, collisions or scorewhoring. :D

Offline Bronk

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9044
Do you consider this acceptable?
« Reply #38 on: March 08, 2007, 03:16:24 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by kamilyun
I disagree.  We are missing a hijack to a totally unrelated "dead horse" whine such as warping, collisions or scorewhoring. :D


Close I'd say.
Hijack under way and they touched on scorewhoring with the "milkrunning and shooting ones own squad". Per husky01 reference.

Now we just need a ram whine and warp then we can declare it "Perfecto".




:rofl :rofl

Bronk
See Rule #4

Offline SkyRock

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7758
Do you consider this acceptable?
« Reply #39 on: March 08, 2007, 03:20:31 PM »
I think something is fishy!  I saw some guys switch sides the other night(unloyal twits) and then when they attacked me, one of them was warping badly right when I got on his six,(cable puller)  then his friend came in and HO'd me(HO dweeb), and then the third guy came in and rammed me and I got all the damage and he flew away unscathed(Ram tard!) :mad: :furious :mad: :furious :t :t




:noid

Triton28 - "...his stats suggest he has a healthy combination of suck and sissy!"

Offline kamilyun

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1467
Do you consider this acceptable?
« Reply #40 on: March 08, 2007, 03:22:11 PM »
Done.  (Enter Skuzzy stage right)

Offline FrodeMk3

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2481
Do you consider this acceptable?
« Reply #41 on: March 08, 2007, 03:22:58 PM »
Quote
Did I mention anyones name, or squad name? I don't remember.


No, you did not. But since this thread came out about 24 hours after AKKaz's thread explaining why his squad split onto 2 countries, One can only assume that they are who you are alluding to in your original post.

Offline Bronk

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9044
Do you consider this acceptable?
« Reply #42 on: March 08, 2007, 03:23:30 PM »
Stick a fork in it folks, cuz it's done.

Perfecto


:D

Bronk
See Rule #4

Offline FrodeMk3

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2481
Do you consider this acceptable?
« Reply #43 on: March 08, 2007, 03:26:54 PM »
Quote
Stick a fork in it folks, cuz it's done.


Never shoulda went in the oven to start with. :rofl

Offline nexus69

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 108
      • http://www.708th.com
Do you consider this acceptable?
« Reply #44 on: March 08, 2007, 03:29:49 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by FrodeMk3
No, you did not. But since this thread came out about 24 hours after AKKaz's thread explaining why his squad split onto 2 countries, One can only assume that they are who you are alluding to in your original post.



NO, I had no knowledge of that post. But I'll guess that even if he other post had 124 hours I would be blame the same..

Have a good day
« Last Edit: March 08, 2007, 03:34:50 PM by nexus69 »