Author Topic: Lazs wants to end women's suffrage! (Read 7001 times)

Neubob · « **Reply #15 on:** September 30, 2007, 08:35:09 AM »

Are you making a list of names and then crossing them out?

Tigeress · « **Reply #16 on:** September 30, 2007, 08:48:35 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by Neubob
Are you making a list of names and then crossing them out?

Not making a list... just observing.

TIGERESS

Angus · « **Reply #17 on:** September 30, 2007, 09:03:11 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by Tigeress
I am not going to be drawn into a battle of the sexes.
I am taking note of who says what though.

There are plenty of men here and elsewhere who don't do all their thinking with their gonads.

I think this topic is very offensive.

TIGERESS

It is absolutely offensive indeed. Okay, where is a chevalier when needed

I'm in, maybe not a bad idea, for I am a guy, but completely disagree with Lazs. In most cases

Now, the burning crosses stuff as well as questionable allowance of woman's rights seems to come from the same camp.
Same camp as I know so well in the global warming and gun threads. Didn't mention coloured folks and religion yet though.

You will observe some different kinds of posts on this thread, - if it doesn't get locked or something like that.
The ones that will pass for your observation are such of the Lazs kind such as this:
"Originally posted by lazs2
well... let me ask you...
Do you think the people are more or less free since we let women vote?
Would you like to live your life as your mom/wife/girlfriend believes you should?
lazs "

A very good thing indeed, since he does not seem to categorize women as half the "people" which they are. All those rantings on rights......

So, let's fish out some more golden ones. Upcoming ....

BTW, my remark about women and guns was a straight slash about "rights", since some here are very hot about the necessity of having plenty of artillery, while doubting woman's rights for even the vote! As a guy I get offended about a statement like the one I quoted simply for the behalf of the women. GRRRRRR!

lazs2 · « **Reply #18 on:** September 30, 2007, 09:05:19 AM »

I never let women drive me around either.

That is not to say that there are not some women who should vote and that there are not some women who drive well..

there are just so few of em that it is not worth it.

Women should be allowed to have firearms.

txmom... it is not that women are not informed or study the issues. it is that they vote for security over freedom..

It is their nature. That is fine for raising children but is very bad for adults.

I would say one thing tho... It would be fine for women to vote if we still had a strong constitution that we followed..

lazs

Angus · « **Reply #19 on:** September 30, 2007, 09:12:43 AM »

So you do say that not all women should have the rights for voting.
Just here:
"That is not to say that there are not some women who should vote and that there are not some women who drive well.."

"Some women should vote". You really amaze me, and IMHO guys that claim things like this should neither vote, shoot, or drive.

lazs2 · « **Reply #20 on:** September 30, 2007, 09:16:49 AM »

well.. of course that would be your opinion... you are a product of women being allowed to vote and... proof of what I say.

It really wouldn't matter if no one could vote on security over freedom. You could weep openly at the voting booth along with the women on the lack of compassion in politics for all I care. Just so long as you couldn't restrict my freedom.

lazs

Curval · « **Reply #21 on:** September 30, 2007, 09:28:32 AM »

But lazs, your suggestion of eliminating the right for women to vote is an EXTREME form of restricting THEIR freedom. What would give you that right? The Constitution? I hope not.

lazs2 · « **Reply #22 on:** September 30, 2007, 09:32:01 AM »

yes it would. I am not in favor of that. It is merely my opinion that they should not vote...or... they should vote as some man tells em to.

The problem is not so much with them voting as with them being able to vote for politicians and laws that are unconstitutional. If we obeyed the constitution there would be no problem with women and womenly men voting... they would have nothing to vote on.

nothing to hurt me anyway.

lazs

Curval · « **Reply #23 on:** September 30, 2007, 09:35:27 AM »

lol

Silly me.

lazs2 · « **Reply #24 on:** September 30, 2007, 09:46:24 AM »

curval... I have told you several times in the past that it would not be my right to take away womens right to vote.

My opinion is that they never should have been allowed to vote tho. It would be no more unconstitutional than telling me I couldn't own a BAR or Thompson sub gun or a shotgun that is 1/16 of an inch too short soooo..

hell.. we either live by the constitution or.. anything goes. We can get back to freedom from two directions... we can simply abide by the constitution and get our freedoms back... or.. we can take away womens right to vote and have em go back on their own.

The former works better than the latter for me but I am just enough of a hypocrite to not be upset by the latter.

lazs

Tigeress · « **Reply #25 on:** September 30, 2007, 10:05:16 AM »

Here are some fine examples of sociopaths who would agree with certian views voiced here...

Those that think as they do should go stand with them, imho.

TIGERESS

EDIT: These three sociopaths are/were the direct (and indirect) cause of the death of more women than I could count in a lifetime.

lazs2 · « **Reply #26 on:** September 30, 2007, 10:13:47 AM »

and... every single one of those was loved by the women who supported them and bought into their version of security. I bet a lot more women liked hitlers idea of gun control to make them safe than men did for instance.

lazs

Angus · « **Reply #27 on:** September 30, 2007, 10:28:33 AM »

Ok. Now post a pic of yourself

BTW, I'd like to know what you know of gun control. He sure made sure that a lot of bullets were fired. Anyway, His women had a habit of suicide. (not just Eva).
And Göring. Well, he was griefed by the death of his first wife to such an extent that he built a mansion in her memory. Went okay with the second one if I recall right.
Hussein, - a gun-loving hustler, passing the style down to his sons, all are now rotting.
Bin Laden? Did he loose his cherry yet? Anyway, those extreme moslims actually don't like women's right. Things like Voting come in first, then things like dressing, driving, reading etc.....you like a guy calling himself Lazs once said on a forum regarding women's right's:
"My opinion is that they never should have been allowed to vote tho"

Have a nice day.

lazs2 · « **Reply #28 on:** September 30, 2007, 10:40:12 AM »

I don't care how women dress.. I don't care if they drink or smoke or do drugs or wear their seatbelts or helmets or lifejackets in boats... I don't care what they do for sex with other willing adult partners in private and I don't care what they listen too or see and... they can have all the guns they want so far as I am concerned.

they can have all the medical treatment they want so long as they pay for it and not me. They can even commit suicide or kill their unborn up till a certain point.

I just wish that they would leave me alone to do the same... it is not their nature tho. Women... and some less than manly men... feel that security is more important than freedom or individuality... they feel that socialism will cure all the injustices of life... they don't realize that taking away freedom is the biggest injustice of all.

I am of course generalizing.. but it is a good generalization...it is like saying negros vote for democrats. not all do but so many as to make it a viable generalization.

lazs

Neubob · « **Reply #29 on:** September 30, 2007, 10:54:15 AM »

What I love most about Lazs speeches is the utter lack of emotion--especially when it's on issues that make other people red with anger in 2 seconds or less.

Easily worth the price of admission