This week: Tunisia

[Oldman731]

North Africa - Final Moves

Pressed between the veteran British Eighth Army on the
East, and the green but eager U.S. forces on the West,
the Afrika Korps fights the final delaying action.

Allied Forces (Bishops)

On Land:
 Boston
 C-47
 Hurri I, IIC, IID
 P38G
 P40E
 Spit5
 M3
 M8
 M16
 Ostwind
 Panzer IV

On Carriers:
 F4F
 Dauntless


Axis Forces (Knights)
Bf-109E
Bf-109F
Bf-110C
C. 202
FW-190A5
C-47
Ju-88
Stuka
M3
M8
M16
Ostwind
Panzer IV

Fog is set at 12.5 miles.
Radar settings as follows:
   Tower 132,000 (feet)
   Sector 316,800
Fuel is 1.0 burn rate.
Ack is .25 for low-level ack, .1 for puffy ack
  (that is, considerably less effective than MA).
Friendly mid-airs are off.
Killshooter is on.
Strat is disabled.
Rooks are disabled.  Pick Bishops or Knights.
Closest opposing bases are located along north coast
  and down in southeast.

AND PLEASE REMEMBER:  Civil behavior is valued,
and required, in this arena.

[KONG1]

Originally posted by Oldman731
AND PLEASE REMEMBER:  Civil behavior is valued,
and required, in this arena.

As a long time and devoted citizen of the AvA, fully committed to adhering to any and all requirements, I feel compelled to understand this statement and therefore have a few pertinent questions.

(1) What would constitute civil behavior or, conversely, uncivil behavior?

(1.1) If civil/uncivil behavior is codified:
(1.1.1) Who were the authoring party(s)?
(1.1.2) Where could I find documentation of such?
(1.1.3) How would one petition for modification of such?

(1.2) If civil/uncivil behavior is a matter of judgement:
(1.2.1) Whose judgment?
(1.2.2) Would the judging party(s) be omnipresent?
(1.2.3) To whom would one appeal said judgment?

(2) Accepting that this requirement exists:
(2.1) How was the determination made that there should be a requirement?
(2.2) When was this requirement instituted?
(2.3) Who would enforce this requirement?
(2.3.1) Would the enforcing party(s) be omnipresent?
(2.3.2) What form would enforcement take?
(2.4) How would failure to adhere to this requirement be determined?

Since I am unaware of who instituted this requirement I am not sure to whom I should ask these questions. If anyone reading this post has any information about the creator(s) of this requirement, such information would be appreciated. If any are in contact with the creators, please inform them that there is some clarification required by those that wish to comply with this requirement and point them to this post.

Thanks in advance.

[dedalos]

Originally posted by KONG1
As a long time and devoted citizen of the AvA, fully committed to adhering to any and all requirements, I feel compelled to understand this statement and therefore have a few pertinent questions.

(1) What would constitute civil behavior or, conversely, uncivil behavior?

(1.1) If civil/uncivil behavior is codified:
(1.1.1) Who were the authoring party(s)?
(1.1.2) Where could I find documentation of such?
(1.1.3) How would one petition for modification of such?

(1.2) If civil/uncivil behavior is a matter of judgement:
(1.2.1) Whose judgment?
(1.2.2) Would the judging party(s) be omnipresent?
(1.2.3) To whom would one appeal said judgment?

(2) Accepting that this requirement exists:
(2.1) How was the determination made that there should be a requirement?
(2.2) When was this requirement instituted?
(2.3) Who would enforce this requirement?
(2.3.1) Would the enforcing party(s) be omnipresent?
(2.3.2) What form would enforcement take?
(2.4) How would failure to adhere to this requirement be determined?

Since I am unaware of who instituted this requirement I am not sure to whom I should ask these questions. If anyone reading this post has any information about the creator(s) of this requirement, such information would be appreciated. If any are in contact with the creators, please inform them that there is some clarification required by those that wish to comply with this requirement and point them to this post.

Thanks in advance.

[Tiger]

Originally posted by KONG1
As a long time and devoted citizen of the AvA, fully committed to adhering to any and all requirements, I feel compelled to understand this statement and therefore have a few pertinent questions.

(1) What would constitute civil behavior or, conversely, uncivil behavior?

(1.1) If civil/uncivil behavior is codified:
(1.1.1) Who were the authoring party(s)?
(1.1.2) Where could I find documentation of such?
(1.1.3) How would one petition for modification of such?

(1.2) If civil/uncivil behavior is a matter of judgement:
(1.2.1) Whose judgment?
(1.2.2) Would the judging party(s) be omnipresent?
(1.2.3) To whom would one appeal said judgment?

(2) Accepting that this requirement exists:
(2.1) How was the determination made that there should be a requirement?
(2.2) When was this requirement instituted?
(2.3) Who would enforce this requirement?
(2.3.1) Would the enforcing party(s) be omnipresent?
(2.3.2) What form would enforcement take?
(2.4) How would failure to adhere to this requirement be determined?

Since I am unaware of who instituted this requirement I am not sure to whom I should ask these questions. If anyone reading this post has any information about the creator(s) of this requirement, such information would be appreciated. If any are in contact with the creators, please inform them that there is some clarification required by those that wish to comply with this requirement and point them to this post.

Thanks in advance.

Please contact HiTech Legal Affairs at 1-800-leroyjenkins

[TequilaChaser]

Originally posted by KONG1
I feel compelled to understand this statement

don't you mean impelled?

it is in relation to the unwritten rules or ethics of gameplay for all, in the arena........what has become to be accepted by the elders that were here before you or I......

[Dichotomy]

I had a really nice couple of fights with a player whose name I can't remember.  He got me twice, I got him once or rather the trees did.   dude that was fun and broke me out of the funk I woke up in this am