Author Topic: battle ships  (Read 949 times)

Offline splitatom

  • Parolee
  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 765
battle ships
« on: November 11, 2007, 05:16:39 PM »
we need to add a new ship to the fleets also make it harder for bombers to hit the cv with more aa:aok
snowey flying since tour 78

Offline Spikes

  • Aces High CM Staff
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15721
    • Twitch: Twitch Feed
battle ships
« Reply #1 on: November 11, 2007, 05:24:56 PM »
SuperAck + 4 destroyers and 1 crusier...and you want MORE ack?

go fly a set of buffs low through CV ack...
i7-12700k | Gigabyte Z690 GAMING X | 64GB G.Skill DDR4 | EVGA 1080ti FTW3 | H150i Capellix

FlyKommando.com

Offline MachFly

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6296
battle ships
« Reply #2 on: November 11, 2007, 06:07:26 PM »
I think another battleship should be added just like in AvA Japan map
"Now, if I had to make the choice of one fighter aircraft above all the others...it would be, without any doubt, the world's greatest propeller driven flying machine - the magnificent and immortal Spitfire."
Lt. Col. William R. Dunn
flew Spitfires, Hurricanes, P-51s, P-47s, and F-4s

Offline texastc316

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1774
      • Mighty 316th
battle ships
« Reply #3 on: November 11, 2007, 07:34:26 PM »
yeah more stuff to bomb, ack would suck though lol
TexsTC-CO/Court Jester-Mighty 316th FS "CREEPING DEATH"  in MA/FSO

The eager pilots are not experienced. And the experienced not eager.

S.A.P.P.- Secret Association Of P-38 Pilots (Lightning In A Bottle)

Offline Mr No Name

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1835
battle ships
« Reply #4 on: November 11, 2007, 08:19:17 PM »
actually the battleship was only on a couple of tours... what we have now is a heavy cruiser
Vote R.E. Lee '24

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23047
battle ships
« Reply #5 on: November 11, 2007, 08:57:03 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Mr No Name
actually the battleship was only on a couple of tours... what we have now is a heavy cruiser

We have never had a battleship in AH.  What we have now is the same thing we've had since the time ships were added.
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Online Meatwad

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 12792
battle ships
« Reply #6 on: November 11, 2007, 09:01:03 PM »
BB would be neat to have, but alas I doubt we will ever get one
See Rule 19- Do not place sausage on pizza.
I am No-Sausage-On-Pizza-Wad.
Das Funkillah - I kill hangers, therefore I am a funkiller. Coming to a vulchfest near you.
You cant tie a loop around 400000 lbs of locomotive using a 2 foot rope - Drediock on fat women

Offline Masherbrum

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 22408
battle ships
« Reply #7 on: November 11, 2007, 09:11:46 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by SpikesX
SuperAck + 4 destroyers and 1 crusier...and you want MORE ack?

go fly a set of buffs low through CV ack...
Buffs shouldn't be able to get anywhere near a CV group in the first place.
-=Most Wanted=-

FSO Squad 412th FNVG
http://worldfamousfridaynighters.com/
Co-Founder of DFC

Offline Masherbrum

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 22408
battle ships
« Reply #8 on: November 11, 2007, 09:12:23 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Mr No Name
actually the battleship was only on a couple of tours... what we have now is a heavy cruiser
We never had a BB.
-=Most Wanted=-

FSO Squad 412th FNVG
http://worldfamousfridaynighters.com/
Co-Founder of DFC

Offline Mr No Name

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1835
battle ships
« Reply #9 on: November 11, 2007, 10:44:33 PM »
guys don't you remember a few years back when we has a BB alone task group?  there was no CV with the group but there was a BB
Vote R.E. Lee '24

Online Meatwad

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 12792
battle ships
« Reply #10 on: November 11, 2007, 10:52:32 PM »
That was the cruiser


If I remember right that was that one map that had about 6 or higher TG's per country
See Rule 19- Do not place sausage on pizza.
I am No-Sausage-On-Pizza-Wad.
Das Funkillah - I kill hangers, therefore I am a funkiller. Coming to a vulchfest near you.
You cant tie a loop around 400000 lbs of locomotive using a 2 foot rope - Drediock on fat women

Offline splitatom

  • Parolee
  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 765
battle ships
« Reply #11 on: November 13, 2007, 05:52:03 PM »
radar aa is only good with the 40 mm and 20 mm not with 5 in fly above 7000 ft you are save from everything exept for maned 5in
snowey flying since tour 78

Offline MachFly

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6296
battle ships
« Reply #12 on: November 13, 2007, 09:28:52 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by MachFly
I think another battleship should be added just like in AvA Japan map


So anyways, what do you guys think about adding another ship?
"Now, if I had to make the choice of one fighter aircraft above all the others...it would be, without any doubt, the world's greatest propeller driven flying machine - the magnificent and immortal Spitfire."
Lt. Col. William R. Dunn
flew Spitfires, Hurricanes, P-51s, P-47s, and F-4s

Offline Keiler

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 314
battle ships
« Reply #13 on: November 14, 2007, 01:13:34 AM »
I'd be all for a battleship battlegroup, i.e. BB and some DD's. No LVT launching capability, just a menace to pork fields, hunt CV groups and cause general mayhem. Plus, one more interesting target to hunt down :)

Matt

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23047
battle ships
« Reply #14 on: November 14, 2007, 09:49:02 AM »
I'd love to see a Yamato BB group.

Or a King George V BB group.  The US has a task force in game, give the Japanese or British a task group.

Sure, the Iowa would be the most survivable, but that isn't the only consideration.  Both the late Yamato and the King George V put out decent AA fire themselves.
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-