Author Topic: Ben Stein vs. Sputtering Atheists  (Read 18749 times)

Offline Holden McGroin

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8591
Re: Ben Stein vs. Sputtering Atheists
« Reply #420 on: April 27, 2008, 03:48:24 PM »
But if the a male from the furry tribe and one from the bikini tribe got it on, they would produce a HUMAN, right?

Not if the branches grew apart long enough.

After eons of isolation, they could have an offspring that was infertile.

Is a mule a horse or a donkey?
Holden McGroin LLC makes every effort to provide accurate and complete information. Since humor, irony, and keen insight may be foreign to some readers, no warranty, expressed or implied is offered. Re-writing this disclaimer cost me big bucks at the lawyer’s office!

Offline moot

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 16333
      • http://www.dasmuppets.com
Re: Ben Stein vs. Sputtering Atheists
« Reply #421 on: April 27, 2008, 04:02:49 PM »
Recent acceleration of human adaptive evolution
Quote
Genomic surveys in humans identify a large amount of recent positive selection. Using the 3.9-million HapMap SNP dataset, we found that selection has accelerated greatly during the last 40,000 years. We tested the null hypothesis that the observed age distribution of recent positively selected linkage blocks is consistent with a constant rate of adaptive substitution during human evolution. We show that a constant rate high enough to explain the number of recently selected variants would predict (i) site heterozygosity at least 10-fold lower than is observed in humans, (ii) a strong relationship of heterozygosity and local recombination rate, which is not observed in humans, (iii) an implausibly high number of adaptive substitutions between humans and chimpanzees, and (iv) nearly 100 times the observed number of high-frequency linkage disequilibrium blocks. Larger populations generate more new selected mutations, and we show the consistency of the observed data with the historical pattern of human population growth. We consider human demographic growth to be linked with past changes in human cultures and ecologies. Both processes have contributed to the extraordinarily rapid recent genetic evolution of our species.
« Last Edit: April 27, 2008, 04:04:47 PM by moot »
Hello ant
running very fast
I squish you

Offline SirLoin

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5705
Re: Ben Stein vs. Sputtering Atheists
« Reply #422 on: April 27, 2008, 04:54:53 PM »
Anyone who thinks there is some order or design to the universe should take a close look at the Andromeda galaxy(it can be seen with the naked eye)...3 billion years from now(mark it on your calender),this galaxy will collide with ours...our sun turns into a red dwarf,then a red giant and every living thing on this planet gets broiled alive.

Some design...and quite some designer.
« Last Edit: April 27, 2008, 04:56:36 PM by SirLoin »
**JOKER'S JOKERS**

Offline Donzo

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2355
      • http://www.bops.us
Re: Ben Stein vs. Sputtering Atheists
« Reply #423 on: April 27, 2008, 05:54:18 PM »
Anyone who thinks there is some order or design to the universe should take a close look at the Andromeda galaxy(it can be seen with the naked eye)...3 billion years from now(mark it on your calender),this galaxy will collide with ours...our sun turns into a red dwarf,then a red giant and every living thing on this planet gets broiled alive.

Some design...and quite some designer.

How does this indicate that there is/isn't a designer?

Offline SirLoin

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5705
Re: Ben Stein vs. Sputtering Atheists
« Reply #424 on: April 27, 2008, 05:57:44 PM »
How does this indicate that there is/isn't a designer?

Are you talking about bringing on the armageddon?
**JOKER'S JOKERS**

Offline redman555

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2193
Re: Ben Stein vs. Sputtering Atheists
« Reply #425 on: April 27, 2008, 05:59:13 PM »
im atheist = D have been for yrs now


-BigBOBCH
~364th C-HAWKS FG~

Ingame: BigBOBCH

Offline Donzo

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2355
      • http://www.bops.us
Re: Ben Stein vs. Sputtering Atheists
« Reply #426 on: April 27, 2008, 06:12:03 PM »
Are you talking about bringing on the armageddon?

No, I'm asking how this show there is/isn't a designer.

Offline lambo31

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 470
Re: Ben Stein vs. Sputtering Atheists
« Reply #427 on: April 27, 2008, 06:42:30 PM »
It's posts like these... this is an unarmed man attacking a machine gun nest.  You have no clue whatsoever on what you are talking about.  Organisms cannot "choose" traits.... they don't "pick" which ones might work and which ones won't.  Genetic variability shows up only  AFTER pressure is applied to the organism in question.... It's pretty much just "luck" as to which genetic trait is going to turn out positively for the organism.  Please go back and read up on what you are talking about, prior to speaking.

quick example... a random genetic variation allows .01% of the population of say, humans, access to immunity to H5n1.  Say the human population is 10,000, to keep  the numbers low.  Out of those 10,000, 100 would have this unlikely trait, and most likely not know it. H5n1 becomes, through mixing with another flu virus ( A CLEAR EXAMPLE OF EVOLUTION) airborne, and transfers from avian to simian host.  9,900 of the population have no defense against this new pressure.  100 have natural immunity.  Those 100 will survive and reproduce, because they were most readliy prepared for the selective pressure (H5n1) that the population faced.  A preponderance of the offspring will now carry that trait.

Ridiculing me will win me over every time  :)   Shame that as smart as you would have us think you are that you would have to resort to insulting people.





Lambo
« Last Edit: April 27, 2008, 06:50:48 PM by lambo31 »
Ingame ID: Lambo

Offline moot

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 16333
      • http://www.dasmuppets.com
Re: Ben Stein vs. Sputtering Atheists
« Reply #428 on: April 27, 2008, 06:53:09 PM »
Facts take a back seat to feelings.

By the way, that quote of Lewontin you posted doesn't say what you say it does.  And Moray hasn't insulted you in that post.  He posted facts, showed how far off you are from those facts, and wrote what he suggested as remedy to being so far off.
« Last Edit: April 27, 2008, 06:56:06 PM by moot »
Hello ant
running very fast
I squish you

storch

  • Guest
Re: Ben Stein vs. Sputtering Atheists
« Reply #429 on: April 27, 2008, 06:56:15 PM »
H5n1 becomes, through mixing with another flu virus ( A CLEAR EXAMPLE OF EVOLUTION) airborne, and transfers from avian to simian host. 
  it would still be a virus it would not become anything other than a virus.

storch

  • Guest
Re: Ben Stein vs. Sputtering Atheists
« Reply #430 on: April 27, 2008, 06:58:20 PM »
Not if the branches grew apart long enough.

After eons of isolation, they could have an offspring that was infertile.

Is a mule a horse or a donkey?
  it is both. it is a hybrid.  there have been instances of mules being fertile though

Offline SirLoin

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5705
Re: Ben Stein vs. Sputtering Atheists
« Reply #431 on: April 27, 2008, 07:09:44 PM »
No, I'm asking how this show there is/isn't a designer.

Are you sadistic then ?
**JOKER'S JOKERS**

Offline moot

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 16333
      • http://www.dasmuppets.com
Re: Ben Stein vs. Sputtering Atheists
« Reply #432 on: April 27, 2008, 07:11:52 PM »
SirLoin you're doing the same thing they are. 
Hello ant
running very fast
I squish you

Offline Holden McGroin

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8591
Re: Ben Stein vs. Sputtering Atheists
« Reply #433 on: April 27, 2008, 07:21:59 PM »
The point is that isolated populations of the same species will change according to local conditions and will eventually be dissimilar enough to be considered different species.

Quote
it is both. it is a hybrid.  there have been instances of mules being fertile though

There has never been a documented fertile male mule.

Human Chimpanzee hybrids have been rumored.  If such an animal is possible, is it both? 

Holden McGroin LLC makes every effort to provide accurate and complete information. Since humor, irony, and keen insight may be foreign to some readers, no warranty, expressed or implied is offered. Re-writing this disclaimer cost me big bucks at the lawyer’s office!

storch

  • Guest
Re: Ben Stein vs. Sputtering Atheists
« Reply #434 on: April 27, 2008, 07:26:02 PM »
The point is that isolated populations of the same species will change according to local conditions and will eventually be dissimilar enough to be considered different species.

There has never been a documented fertile male mule.

Human Chimpanzee hybrids have been rumored.  If such an animal is possible, is it both? 


no only fertile female mules.  the humanzee has been proven to be false but the subject chimp was uncannily human looking.  here is a linky to oliver the suspected humanzee and his story.  www.rense.com/general67/oliver.htm