« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5   Go Down

Author Topic: IL2  (Read 1826 times)

Offline Anaxogoras

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7072
Re: IL2
« Reply #45 on: October 30, 2008, 11:09:52 PM »
Il-2             34   
LVTA4          1   
M-16           2
Ostwind       13   
Panzer IV H   6
PT Boat       1   
Sherman VC  1   
T-34/76       9   
Wirbelwind    13   

It's nice that you have a few kills in tanks.  :P
Logged
gavagai
334th FS

RPS for Aces High!

Offline Nightshift82

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 526
Re: IL2
« Reply #46 on: October 30, 2008, 11:46:28 PM »
The new IL-2's rock
Logged
Night5  
First tour: 55  (If anyone cares.......)

Offline moot

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 16330
      • http://www.dasmuppets.com
Re: IL2
« Reply #47 on: October 31, 2008, 12:18:02 AM »
Quote from: BaldEagl on October 30, 2008, 02:48:55 PM
Not only are the cannons uber the thing is immune to pintle gun fire.
The oil bin is still as exposed as ever. 
Like I said in the other thread, the Il2 is a flying piece of trash.. Just have a WW around (gasp "teamwork") and at best it dies disabling the WW turret.  The tank the WW's covering can almost ignore the Il2; save for dive bombing attacks.
« Last Edit: October 31, 2008, 12:20:32 AM by moot »
Logged
Hello ant
running very fast
I squish you

Offline Bronk

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9044
Re: IL2
« Reply #48 on: October 31, 2008, 05:22:53 AM »
Quote from: Anaxogoras on October 30, 2008, 11:00:13 PM
Just like Bronk, you're pathetically trolling.  Nice try. :aok

What? You say..
Quote
The last time we discussed this topic, it was pretty easy to figure out that everyone who was against perking the Il-2 spent little or zero time in tanks.  Imagine that. Wink

I as one who have more overall GV time than you doesn't want a perk. That constitutes trolling? Ahhh I see pointing out the inaccuracies of your statements is now trolling. Welcome to Krusty status. I bet your knowledge of the arboreal is quite extensive also. :rolleyes:
Logged
See Rule #4

Offline BaldEagl

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10791
Re: IL2
« Reply #49 on: October 31, 2008, 08:32:38 AM »
Quote from: Bronk on October 30, 2008, 08:31:03 PM
Your just lucky they didn't have the patients to learn the IID.

I love the IID but it's horribly vulnerable to any kind of ground fire, unlike the IL2.
Logged
I edit a lot of my posts.  Get used to it.

Offline Anaxogoras

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7072
Re: IL2
« Reply #50 on: October 31, 2008, 08:34:42 AM »
Quote from: Bronk on October 31, 2008, 05:22:53 AM
What? You say..
I as one who have more overall GV time than you doesn't want a perk. That constitutes trolling? Ahhh I see pointing out the inaccuracies of your statements is now trolling. Welcome to Krusty status. I bet your knowledge of the arboreal is quite extensive also. :rolleyes:

No, I was referring to what you were dong to bipolar in the other il-2 thread.  Pretty easy to figure that one out.
« Last Edit: October 31, 2008, 08:51:23 AM by Anaxogoras »
Logged
gavagai
334th FS

RPS for Aces High!

Offline Anaxogoras

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7072
Re: IL2
« Reply #51 on: October 31, 2008, 08:50:51 AM »
Quote from: Bronk on October 30, 2008, 07:54:23 PM
I'd say I have more overall time in GVs than you (dec 04). I don't want em perked.
Care to rethink your post?

If that's what counts as point out my inaccuracies, I don't deny that you have more gv time than me, but you have almost none since the new Il-2 came out.  Representing yourself the way you did here is a bit disingenuous.
Logged
gavagai
334th FS

RPS for Aces High!

Offline moot

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 16330
      • http://www.dasmuppets.com
Re: IL2
« Reply #52 on: October 31, 2008, 09:41:26 AM »
I got popped in a tiger by Lusche with an Il2. It's still the same big and slow bird that needs to very precisely and predictably make its gunning approach.. AAA fodder. Just have an Ostie or WW on standby like they did historicaly.  There's no sense in complaining that gameplay is shifting towards more teamwork, more bullets flying around blowing toejam up.
Logged
Hello ant
running very fast
I squish you

Offline PFactorDave

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4334
Re: IL2
« Reply #53 on: October 31, 2008, 10:41:35 AM »
Logged

1st Lieutenant
FSO Liaison Officer
Rolling Thunder

Offline hubsonfire

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8658
Re: IL2
« Reply #54 on: October 31, 2008, 10:54:56 AM »
I routinely take damage to the oil or radiator from mg fire in the Il2. The claims of the Ils being impervious to pintle/turret mgs is quite an exaggeration.
Logged
mook
++Blue Knights++

Proper punctuation and capitalization go a long way towards people paying attention to your posts.  -Stoney
I was wondering why I get ignored so often.  -Hitech

Offline Ack-Ack

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 25260
      • FlameWarriors
Re: IL2
« Reply #55 on: October 31, 2008, 12:24:48 PM »
Quote from: hubsonfire on October 31, 2008, 10:54:56 AM
The claims of the Ils being impervious to pintle/turret mgs is quite an exaggeration.

But it's easier to claim that in an attempt to get the IL2 perked so some wouldn't have to waste valuable brain cells coming up with sound tactics that deal with an air threat.  Wouldn't be surprised if those whining to perk the IL2 are the same that want the Spitfire Mk XVI, LA 7, etc., perked.


ack-ack
Logged
"If Jesus came back as an airplane, he would be a P-38." - WW2 P-38 pilot
Elite Top Aces +1 Mexican Official Squadron Song

Offline BaldEagl

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10791
Re: IL2
« Reply #56 on: October 31, 2008, 12:31:52 PM »
Quote from: Ack-Ack on October 31, 2008, 12:24:48 PM
But it's easier to claim that in an attempt to get the IL2 perked so some wouldn't have to waste valuable brain cells coming up with sound tactics that deal with an air threat.  Wouldn't be surprised if those whining to perk the IL2 are the same that want the Spitfire Mk XVI, LA 7, etc., perked.


ack-ack 

I was the one that said that and I don't think the IL2 needs to be perked.

I've been flying the IL2 quite a bit since the revision and I haven't been damaged by pintle fire yet, even though I've taken a lot of it.  The worst damage I've seen so far is a hole in the windscreen glass.  I did however get taken out by a Panzer's main gun on an incredibly lucky crossing shot.
Logged
I edit a lot of my posts.  Get used to it.

Offline Bronk

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9044
Re: IL2
« Reply #57 on: October 31, 2008, 03:08:07 PM »
Quote from: Anaxogoras on October 31, 2008, 08:34:42 AM
No, I was referring to what you were dong to bipolar in the other il-2 thread.  Pretty easy to figure that one out.
LOL bipolar is a big boy so i don't think he neeeds you defending him. Not to mention he familiar with trolling soo....let us just leave it at that.
Logged
See Rule #4

Offline BiPoLaR

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4132
Re: IL2
« Reply #58 on: October 31, 2008, 04:14:17 PM »
Quote from: Bronk on October 31, 2008, 03:08:07 PM
LOL bipolar is a big boy so i don't think he neeeds you defending him. Not to mention he familiar with trolling soo....let us just leave it at that.
Defending no..calling it like he sees it, yes.

you have a good day bronk  :aok
Logged
R.I.P. T.E.Moore (Dad) 9-9-45 - 7-16-10.
R.I.P. Wes Poss  (Best Friend) 11-14-75 - 5-2-14

Offline Bronk

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9044
Re: IL2
« Reply #59 on: October 31, 2008, 04:25:17 PM »
Quote from: BiPoLaR on October 31, 2008, 04:14:17 PM
Defending no..calling it like he sees it, yes.

you have a good day bronk  :aok
Don't you have a whine to post...or something?  :aok
Logged
See Rule #4
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5   Go Up
« previous next »