« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Field Artillery  (Read 639 times)

Offline AKKillz

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 8
Field Artillery
« on: March 11, 2009, 06:11:48 AM »
How about a fixed battery of guns to protect certain airfields from gv attacks and the ability to shell other field and towns. Easy to do. Like shore batteries with a land mode for targeting indirect fire. Of course binocular mode for jeep, m3, and lvts drivers for forward observers to spot the rounds.
Logged

Offline Scherf

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3409
Re: Field Artillery
« Reply #1 on: March 11, 2009, 06:21:39 AM »
How about towed artillery and have done with it?
Logged
... missions were to be met by the commitment of alerted swarms of fighters, composed of Me 109's and Fw 190's, that were strategically based to protect industrial installations. The inferior capabilities of these fighters against the Mosquitoes made this a hopeless and uneconomical effort. 1.JD KTB

Offline moot

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 16333
      • http://www.dasmuppets.com
Re: Field Artillery
« Reply #2 on: March 11, 2009, 07:15:00 AM »
Logged
Hello ant
running very fast
I squish you

Offline phatzo

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3734
      • No Crying
Re: Field Artillery
« Reply #3 on: March 11, 2009, 11:46:03 PM »
Quote from: moot on March 11, 2009, 07:15:00 AM
http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/smf/index.php/topic,248865.msg3061015.html#msg3061015

bit like the WB .spot comand

although have managed to lose a tank to my own artillery by spotting where I was going
Logged
No thank you Turkish, I'm sweet enough.

Offline Cajunn

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 723
Re: Field Artillery
« Reply #4 on: March 12, 2009, 12:46:09 AM »
Maybe put a few 5" guns for both air and ground. :aok
Logged
“The important thing [in tactics] is to suppress the enemy's useful actions but allow his useless actions. However, doing this alone is defensive.”

Miyamoto Musashi (1584-1645)
Japanese Samurai & Philosopher

Offline Chalenge

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15179
Re: Field Artillery
« Reply #5 on: March 12, 2009, 12:59:24 AM »
Whats wrong with tanks?  :confused:
Logged
If you like the Sick Puppy Custom Sound Pack the please consider contributing for future updates by sending a months dues to Hitech Creations for account "Chalenge." Every little bit helps.

Offline Saurdaukar

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8610
      • Army of Muppets
Re: Field Artillery
« Reply #6 on: March 12, 2009, 08:55:01 AM »
Voted no.

Too much emphasis has already been taken away from the 'high' part of Aces High.

You cant do everything.  See WWIIOL for example.
Logged

Offline Penguin

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3089
Re: Field Artillery
« Reply #7 on: March 29, 2009, 12:02:26 PM »
Well, sometimes you want to get out of that pony and hop into a Sherman.  Aces High is not just a flying game, and GV's should be given their fair share of the action.
Logged

Offline waystin2

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10155
Re: Field Artillery
« Reply #8 on: March 29, 2009, 12:14:21 PM »
I say yes to adding artillery, with a bias towards towed artillery.
Logged
CO for the Pigs On The Wing
& The nicest guy in Aces High!
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »