Author Topic: "Judy" dive bomber  (Read 1328 times)

Offline Sikboy

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6702
Re: "Judy" dive bomber
« Reply #15 on: March 18, 2009, 12:48:14 PM »
I stand by my record on this wish...

Judy Judy Judy!

-Sik
You: Blah Blah Blah
Me: Meh, whatever.

Offline SmokinLoon

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6168
Re: "Judy" dive bomber
« Reply #16 on: March 18, 2009, 01:09:22 PM »
I stand by my record on this wish...

Judy Judy Judy!

-Sik

I dont blame ya.  It'd be nice to have.  But as far as "gaps" go... it doesnt fill any gaps that I can think of.   ;)

However, the Ki-45 "Nick" does.   ;) 
Proud grandson of the late Lt. Col. Darrell M. "Bud" Gray, USAF (ret.), B24D pilot, 5th BG/72nd BS. 28 combat missions within the "slot", PTO.

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23047
Re: "Judy" dive bomber
« Reply #17 on: March 18, 2009, 01:22:51 PM »
I dont blame ya.  It'd be nice to have.  But as far as "gaps" go... it doesnt fill any gaps that I can think of.   ;)

However, the Ki-45 "Nick" does.   ;) 
It doesn't close the "Japanese CV attack aircraft from after the mid-30s" gap?
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline Sikboy

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6702
Re: "Judy" dive bomber
« Reply #18 on: March 18, 2009, 06:50:24 PM »
It doesn't close the "Japanese CV attack aircraft from after the mid-30s" gap?

I think he's being facetious. Though the Nick would find some use in Scenarios too. We made good use of the 110 as a Sub back in the CAP event.

-Sik 
You: Blah Blah Blah
Me: Meh, whatever.

Offline FYB

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1074
Re: "Judy" dive bomber
« Reply #19 on: March 19, 2009, 06:17:18 PM »
It doesn't close the "Japanese CV attack aircraft from after the mid-30s" gap?
Hope you're not blaming me for the 1930s aircraft the Japanese flew in WWII.

-FYB
Most skill based sport? -
The sport of understanding women.