Why have a "fighter" category?

[Steve]

I think the last time I checked I was around 3-400 overall. If you are more or less than that, does that make me better than you since you have a lower score than me or you better than me because your score may be better than mine? 

This has nothing to do with the question. You claimed I am an easy kill. I'm curious how you came to that conclusion.


It's becoming clear you can't answer your own claims beyond they are wildly unfounded in anything other than random stabs at debate.  

What I mean is, you claim that most of the top 100 are timid and easy kills yet you can offer no explanation, no logic as to how you came to this conclusion.  Furthermore, you went on to say you don't even know who the top 100 are. 

Finally, you went on to say I'm an easy kill, although I had nothing to do with the debate as I'm nowhere near the top 100.  When asked about this, and how you arrived at this conclusion, you ignored the question.

[Dadsguns]

This has nothing to do with the question. You claimed I am an easy kill. I'm curious how you came to that conclusion.


It's becoming clear you can't answer your own claims beyond they are wildly unfounded in anything other than random stabs at debate.  

Are you serious?  We certainly have a communication break somehwere.
Its becoming clear you need a do over, maybe start to read everything from the start of this post and how you interjected and to where your own questions have you now, I cant help you comprehend a thought process, but I can elect to dismiss your ignorance.   

[Steve]

Are you serious?  We certainly have a communication break somehwere.
Its becoming clear you need a do over, maybe start to read everything from the start of this post and how you interjected and to where your own questions have you now, I cant help you comprehend a thought process, but I can elect to dismiss your ignorance.   

Do you have discussions in real life like this? Where you absolutely refuse to answer questions?

I can't make it any simpler At least answer one question, since you refuse to answer the one about kills per hour :  How did you arrive at the conclusion that I am an easy kill?  It's not a trick question.  It's not a hard question.  answer it.

[ink]

I have fought Steve he is not an easy kill, as a matter of fact he is down right hard to kill, he is very capable and knows how to use his E perfectly, on top of that he is a great shot, and that is the most important aspect of air combat.

if I remember correctly I have also fought you dadsguns, you also gave me great fights, but to say who is better between you and steve would be imposable even if you guys fought, some days your on some days off, we all have them, I have seen circumstances when, stick A can kill stick B , stick B can kill stick C, but stick A cannot kill stick C.   

anybody who is anybody in this game knows "rank" and "score" don't mean crap except when compared to your own stats, and used as a tool for yourself to judge progress, but if you are straight up "gaming the Game" IE only vulching at capped fields, spawn camping, and the many other sorted ways to game the game, then score truly don't mean crap.

I have fought some of the highest ranked players on numerous occasions and whipped them easy, but maybe they were having a bad day? or maybe I was just "on"?

point is " there is no best, there is no #1 guy", that's not why we play this game At least for me anyway, its about having fun, but at the same time I am competitive and want to become the best that I can, and ya I guess I like the idea of the nme cons, upon hearing "INK"  they know they are in for a serious fight, and better be on there A game or have back up.

my $.02

<S> steve and Dadsguns just go have fun forget about this drama.

[Ack-Ack]

LOL like asking them to the dueling arena alone ? BWAHAHAHAHHAHAHAH

I've been waiting for over a year for Dadguns to take me to the DA and teach me how to 'walk the walk' after I wasted a bunch of the Rolling Flatulence one day.  Resigned to the fact he has neither the balls nor the skill to show.


ack-ack

[Dadsguns]

I've been waiting for over a year for Dadguns to take me to the DA and teach me how to 'walk the walk' after I wasted a bunch of the Rolling Flatulence one day.  Resigned to the fact he has neither the balls nor the skill to show.
ack-ack

You both get shot down by Daddy and want your revenge.  I cherish this moment....   

[Ack-Ack]

You both get shot down by Daddy and want your revenge.  I cherish this moment....   

You never showed me how to 'walk the walk' so how could it be?  Like I said, I've resigned myself to the fact that you neither have the balls or the skill to show me how to 'walk the walk'. 


ack-ack

[Dadsguns]

You never showed me how to 'walk the walk' so how could it be?  Like I said, I've resigned myself to the fact that you neither have the balls or the skill to show me how to 'walk the walk'. 
ack-ack

Then if you have resigned, you can now get off of them,,, free rides aint cheap..

[Bronk]

You both get shot down by Daddy and want your revenge.  I cherish this moment....   

Pass it on... you've had enough.

[Steve]

I have fought Steve he is not an easy kill, as a matter of fact he is down right hard to kill, he is very capable and knows how to use his E perfectly, on top of that he is a great shot, and that is the most important aspect of air combat.

Who is better between dads and I is not the point, although I thank you for your words.

The point is, much like his claim that the top 100 are easy kills, that dads has no earthly idea if I'm an easy kill... none whatsoever... zero, zip. Not a clue.
In the last 5 years, the player dadsguns has killed me 1 time; that's right one time. I was in a p51 and he was in a b24. Dadsguns has no inkling of whether or not I'm easy to kill. He also has no idea if he is better than the top 100 as he claims. Based on his anemic kills per hour stat, I'd say he is barely able to beat a 2 weeker but this is speculation.

Furthermore, dadsguns was asked repeatedly to tell us who the "we" is when he called me an easy kill. He said  

And yes, most including YOU, are easy kills as what we are saying here.

   When asked repeatedly about this, who "we" is, he refused to answer. The fact is, Dadsguns pukes out unfounded remarks in hopes that nobody will bother to call him  on it.  

Is the "we"  his squad? Perhaps.  Even if it is, his statement about me  being an easy kill has no basis in experience or fact.  In the last 5 years, his squad has shot me down, fighter to fighter, exactly 1 time. That's right, one time,....ever. During the last few months, FWIW, I've killed members fo his squad 13 times in the air. Dadsguns has no idea what he is talking about, he makes statements about things while possessing no actual knowledge on the subject.

[Dadsguns]

Who is better between dads and I is not the point, although I thank you for your words.

The point is, much like his claim that the top 100 are easy kills, that dads has no earthly idea if I'm an easy kill... none whatsoever... zero, zip. Not a clue.
In the last 5 years, the player dadsguns has killed me 1 time; that's right one time. I was in a p51 and he was in a b24. Dadsguns has no inkling of whether or not I'm easy to kill. He also has no idea if he is better than the top 100 as he claims. Based on his anemic kills per hour stat, I'd say he is barely able to beat a 2 weeker but this is speculation.

Furthermore, dadsguns was asked repeatedly to tell us who the "we" is when he called me an easy kill. He said      When asked repeatedly about this, who "we" is, he refused to answer. The fact is, Dadsguns pukes out unfounded remarks in hopes that nobody will bother to call him  on it.  

Is the "we"  his squad? Perhaps.  Even if it is, his statement about me  being an easy kill has no basis in experience or fact.  In the last 5 years, his squad has shot me down, fighter to fighter, exactly 1 time. That's right, one time. During the last few months, FWIW, I've killed members fo his squad 13 times in the air. Dadsguns has no idea what he is talking about, he makes statements about things while possessing no actual knowledge on the subject.

I answered your question, you just didnt like what you read.  As usual, you and others dont get what YOU want and try to skirt the conversation or belittle everyone else but your idiotic thinking.  Good luck.  Nice try though.

[Steve]

I answered your question, you just didnt like what you read.  As usual, you and others dont get what YOU want and try to skirt the conversation or belittle everyone else but your idiotic thinking.  Good luck.  Nice try though.

You didn't answer anything.  Are you down to just plain lying now?

[Dadsguns]

You didn't answer anything.  Are you down to just plain lying now?

Yeah thats it. You got it. 

[Steve]

I asked you how you came to the conclusion that I was an easy kill.  You didn't answer. 

You said

And yes, most including YOU, are easy kills as what we are saying here.

I asked you who "we" is and you didn't answer. You can insult me all you want with rhetorical barbs but it doesn't change the fact that you haven't answered these questions.  I invite you, yet again, to answer them. If you have answered them, as you claim, go ahead and quote your answer again for me. Go ahead.

[Dadsguns]

I asked you how you came to the conclusion that I was an easy kill.  You didn't answer. 

You said

I asked you who "we" is and you didn't answer. You can insult me all you want with rhetorical barbs but it doesn't change the fact that you haven't answered these questions.  I invite you, yet again, to answer them. If you have answered them, as you claim, go ahead and quote your answer again for me. Go ahead.

No, if you choose not to read what has already been answered, its on you to find it, not me. 

You jump into a conversation demanding some answers to your rhetorical questions and have repeatedly told you to catch up.  You simply choose to continue to ask what has already been said.