Author Topic: The SpitXIV conundrum  (Read 4635 times)

Offline Kazaa

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8371
      • http://www.thefewsquadron.co.uk
Re: The SpitXIV conundrum
« Reply #150 on: April 30, 2009, 12:02:27 PM »
Then by the charts here the Spit 9 is the under achiever, because the version we have will only make around 318 MPH at SL with boost.

I'm not 100% sure about your comment, I will have to test it out non the less.



"If you learn from defeat, you haven't really lost."

Offline PJ_Godzilla

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2661
190 D-11
« Reply #151 on: April 30, 2009, 12:09:28 PM »
since we're talking wish list, I'd like to see a perked version of the 190D. The D-11 was very similar to the D-9 - with the notable addition of two 30mm cannon in the wings, outboard of the existing 20's.

Also, what about Night Ops? I'd call it a new frontier for AHII. Think of the possible add'l a/c: HE219, P-61, JU 388, etc.

Also, why no Me 210/410? Historical accounts show them to be numerous and reasonably successful bomber hunters, if kill-pads for the Allied fighter jocks.
Some say revenge is a dish best served cold. I say it's usually best served hot, chunky, and foaming. Eventually, you will all die in my vengeance vomit firestorm.

Offline Kazaa

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8371
      • http://www.thefewsquadron.co.uk
Re: The SpitXIV conundrum
« Reply #152 on: April 30, 2009, 12:14:20 PM »
Erm, 190 thread that way. >



"If you learn from defeat, you haven't really lost."

Offline Lusche

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23869
      • Last.FM Profile
Re: 190 D-11
« Reply #153 on: April 30, 2009, 12:16:51 PM »
since we're talking wish list, I'd like to see a perked version of the 190D. The D-11 was very similar to the D-9 - with the notable addition of two 30mm cannon in the wings, outboard of the existing 20's.

D-11 wasn't in serial production, only 5 protoypes were build out of old A-8's


Sorry Kaz ;)
Steam: DrKalv
E:D Snailman

Offline moot

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 16330
      • http://www.dasmuppets.com
Re: The SpitXIV conundrum
« Reply #154 on: April 30, 2009, 12:18:14 PM »
There's a 410 thread too, and one weighing the pros and cons of a 219, etc. Contribute in those if you have to :)   As far as a perked 190D, it'd best be one optimized for low alt.
Hello ant
running very fast
I squish you

Offline PJ_Godzilla

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2661
Re: The SpitXIV conundrum
« Reply #155 on: April 30, 2009, 12:31:38 PM »
Re: the D-11 - at least one served in JV-44... and, as with the 219, there is always the possibility of assembled ac w/o werknummeren (so called "phantom" builds - typically done on site). Otherwise, my bad. I see no way to start a new topic.
Some say revenge is a dish best served cold. I say it's usually best served hot, chunky, and foaming. Eventually, you will all die in my vengeance vomit firestorm.

Offline moot

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 16330
      • http://www.dasmuppets.com
Re: The SpitXIV conundrum
« Reply #156 on: April 30, 2009, 12:48:03 PM »
« Last Edit: April 30, 2009, 12:52:02 PM by moot »
Hello ant
running very fast
I squish you

Offline Kazaa

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8371
      • http://www.thefewsquadron.co.uk
Re: The SpitXIV conundrum
« Reply #157 on: April 30, 2009, 01:15:22 PM »
Wtb 150 octane fuel in AH2! :aok No one has a problem with that, right ? :uhoh



"If you learn from defeat, you haven't really lost."

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23046
Re: The SpitXIV conundrum
« Reply #158 on: April 30, 2009, 01:18:00 PM »
Then by the charts here the Spit 9 is the under achiever, because the version we have will only make around 318 MPH at SL with boost.
Our Spit IX is a 1942 F.Mk IX with a Merlin 61 at +15lbs boost, not a 1943 LF.Mk IX with a Merlin 66 as on that chart.  Ours performs correctly.  The Mk VIII and Mk XVI in AH both have a Merlin 66, so compare them to the chart.
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline Motherland

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8110
Re: The SpitXIV conundrum
« Reply #159 on: April 30, 2009, 06:01:32 PM »
Finally got to duel Machfly today, a couple times before time was up. I've never dueled the way he suggested before, and it was interesting. Instead of a set merge we just stayed in the sector, climbed 'til we found each other and went at it.

Only got 2 duels in, both with him in the Spitfire MkXIV, first with me in Spitfire Mk XVI and then me in the Bf.109K-4.

14vs16 was about a co-e merge and 14vsK he had a bit of alt on me.
'bout 2.5 megs for each film

http://www.mediafire.com/file/iggzdigdmzj/Machfly16.ahf

http://www.mediafire.com/file/mlzgq51tyzm/Machfly109K.ahf

Offline MachFly

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6296
Re: The SpitXIV conundrum
« Reply #160 on: April 30, 2009, 06:07:36 PM »
Did not have much luck  :cry lol

good fight  :salute
"Now, if I had to make the choice of one fighter aircraft above all the others...it would be, without any doubt, the world's greatest propeller driven flying machine - the magnificent and immortal Spitfire."
Lt. Col. William R. Dunn
flew Spitfires, Hurricanes, P-51s, P-47s, and F-4s

Offline Motherland

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8110
Re: The SpitXIV conundrum
« Reply #161 on: April 30, 2009, 06:08:58 PM »
:salute
Better than trying to find a fight in the MA was treating me :) Good fun
I would like to try with standard merge rules as well at least once or twice :)

Offline moot

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 16330
      • http://www.dasmuppets.com
Re: The SpitXIV conundrum
« Reply #162 on: April 30, 2009, 06:10:15 PM »
K4 link looks broken.
Hello ant
running very fast
I squish you

Offline Motherland

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8110
Re: The SpitXIV conundrum
« Reply #163 on: April 30, 2009, 06:11:55 PM »
Works for me...

Offline moot

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 16330
      • http://www.dasmuppets.com
Re: The SpitXIV conundrum
« Reply #164 on: April 30, 2009, 06:15:58 PM »
"The key you provided for file download was invalid. This is usually caused because the file is no longer stored on Mediafire. This occurs when the file is removed by the originating user or Mediafire."
Hello ant
running very fast
I squish you