How is saying have two arenas and no (max 200) caps on arenas that can handle 1000 is equal to the desire of having one arena.
There seems to be a logical step in thinking that goes beyond my comprehension.
I think there was a policy error that resulted in a lot of coding into the arena caps system and now that it's failing from some users perspective in the task of enhancing their gaming experience there is a reluctance to fix what is broken.
More thought and analysis of user behavior, the reasons behind their choice of arenas should be conducted after which a more viable solution to this problem would surface.
I'm so smart, I sometimes have trouble understanding where my super fast and logical thinking abilities came from. 
Santaana.
1. Why have arena limits.
Simply put there is an optimal number of people in an arena that works best for the most people to have fun in many aspects. This number is more than 1 and less than 500.
As sine quick reasons why there is a top end cap, here are just a few.
1. Communication on country/voice and 200. With more people it can almost become unreadable.
2. The more people the less noticed each person is, and hence they are more anonymous.
3. More people create more of a herding / fly where they are not mentality. This is because each person feels they have less of an impact on the game, hence they need to be part of a bigger flying group to have any impact.
More thought and analysis of user behavior, the reasons behind their choice of arenas should be conducted after which a more viable solution to this problem would surface.
No need for more analysis, it is called heard behavior, and is just the nature of the human animal.
How is saying have two arenas and no (max 200) caps on arenas that can handle 1000 is equal to the desire of having one arena.
Simple fact everyone would go to the one arena.
From me.
saantana: Also be aware that many people will try disguise there desire for 1 arena with a suggestion that has the net effect of 1 arena.
HiTech
HiTech
