Author Topic: Brewster B-239 and the I-16  (Read 8276 times)

Offline Clone155

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 918
Re: Brewster B-239 and the I-16
« Reply #15 on: June 26, 2009, 04:41:23 PM »
I got into a very long turn fight with another Brewster (<S>  Santaana), had my flaps waaay out and was having a blast.  Then I got rammed by somebody trying to pick me, knocked my tail feathers off.  Plane pitched up, I kept the throttle full...  Floated down and landed like a helicopter, plane settled right side up pretty as you please.  I think I fell at least 500 feet, maybe more!   :rofl
:lol

On another topic, the I16 is looking to have a bleak future with the poor fuel consumption...

Offline Lusche

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23926
      • Last.FM Profile
Re: Brewster B-239 and the I-16
« Reply #16 on: June 26, 2009, 05:19:35 PM »
:lol

On another topic, the I16 is looking to have a bleak future with the poor fuel consumption...

I think it can make a good NOE defense plane, and you will see it a lot on CV vs land base battles.

---

I have only a little time in it yet, but to me it seems the I-16 is way more stable than I would have expected, both from what I have read as well as watching original footage of that plane in action.

The B-239 is a low-speed monster. May become the dread of all A6M5's in latewar :)

I'm pretty sure particulary the Brewster will see a lot more sustained usage after the novelty wears off than the P-39
« Last Edit: June 26, 2009, 05:22:32 PM by Lusche »
Steam: DrKalv
E:D Snailman

In November 2025, Lusche will return for a 20th anniversary tour. Get your tickets now!

Offline moot

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 16333
      • http://www.dasmuppets.com
Re: Brewster B-239 and the I-16
« Reply #17 on: June 26, 2009, 05:32:45 PM »
It feels like the same sort of artificial stability that the F4U isn't supposed to have at departure.  The I-16 does have a pretty loose departure, so it's not completely uncharacteristic.
« Last Edit: June 26, 2009, 05:34:17 PM by moot »
Hello ant
running very fast
I squish you

Offline WWhiskey

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3122
Re: Brewster B-239 and the I-16
« Reply #18 on: June 26, 2009, 05:32:53 PM »
So far I must say I like both airplanes. Best of all they really duel each other out really well. The Historical recreations including the two should be awsome. We'll see how it works out. I'll say this already however and that is I like the 235 more then the FM2. I think the 235 handles better.

 yea i thouhgt i very funny, the fm2 will now have to run and B.And Z.
Flying since tour 71.

Offline Saxman

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9155
Re: Brewster B-239 and the I-16
« Reply #19 on: June 26, 2009, 05:58:59 PM »
I sort of wish HTC had made a separate B-239 and F2A-3, rather than just making it a single aircraft with gun packages. The F2A-3 had a good deal more weight than the 239 so we've really got sort of a hybrid with the US gun package (granted, it had an extra 200hp as well, but nowhere near enough power increase to make up for it). The result is a sprightlier Brewster than the USMC, RAF and Dutch actually had against the Japanese.
Ron White says you can't fix stupid. I beg to differ. Stupid will usually sort itself out, it's just a matter of making sure you're not close enough to become collateral damage.

Offline Krusty

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 26745
Re: Brewster B-239 and the I-16
« Reply #20 on: June 26, 2009, 06:14:25 PM »
I've had the stall buffet occur a few times, but has anybody spun out or dropped a wing in one yet?  :uhoh

EDIT: referring to the brewster this time

Offline Grendel

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 877
      • http://www.compart.fi/icebreakers
Re: Brewster B-239 and the I-16
« Reply #21 on: June 26, 2009, 06:20:37 PM »
I sort of wish HTC had made a separate B-239 and F2A-3, rather than just making it a single aircraft with gun packages. The F2A-3 had a good deal more weight than the 239 so we've really got sort of a hybrid with the US gun package

What US gun package?

Finnish Brewsters had two weapon layouts. Originally with 3 x heavy and 1 x light MGs, which was upgraded to 4 x heavies.

Offline Guppy35

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 20386
Re: Brewster B-239 and the I-16
« Reply #22 on: June 26, 2009, 06:45:52 PM »
I had a spectacular low speed crash in an I-16- some Finn took a wing off, and I tumbled in, ripped off the tail, then the other wing, then one gear strut, and rolled over on the canopy, sliding to a halt in a stand of trees. It's interesting to fight at speeds low enough to survive unscheduled departures.  ;)

I do that in the 38G on the deck all the time.  Managed it nicely in the Brewster too.  Way too low and slow, plowed into the water, both wings and tail came off.  Then Bat came in and rammed me and he broke up the same way and we were both sitting there in the water having a good laugh at that tough little bird :)
Dan/CorkyJr
8th FS "Headhunters

Offline moot

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 16333
      • http://www.dasmuppets.com
Re: Brewster B-239 and the I-16
« Reply #23 on: June 26, 2009, 07:11:48 PM »
The I-16 speed limit is above 550TAS.  No broken parts and I couldn't snap anything off by ham handing it around either.  Couldn't even get the airframe to creak.
Hello ant
running very fast
I squish you

Offline Guppy35

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 20386
Re: Brewster B-239 and the I-16
« Reply #24 on: June 26, 2009, 08:33:48 PM »
I've had the stall buffet occur a few times, but has anybody spun out or dropped a wing in one yet?  :uhoh

EDIT: referring to the brewster this time

Yes, during some stall fighting with Batfink.  flaps hanging out and stalled it and dropped a wing.  Easy to recover though.
Dan/CorkyJr
8th FS "Headhunters

Offline Widewing

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8801
Re: Brewster B-239 and the I-16
« Reply #25 on: June 26, 2009, 10:20:00 PM »
I ventured into the Beta arena tonight and flew a single sortie on furball island. Shot down a pair of I-16s and a 109F. The I-16s really had nothing for the Brewster close-in. However, they are tough little fighters, sucking up a great deal of .50 cal ammo before going down. The 109F had an altitude advantage. He tried to suck me up into a climbing flight, but I wouldn't play his game. Instead, I dogged his low six until he came down.  After a couple of minutes, the 109F had lost his E advantage. Even with flaps out, the 109F was completely outclassed in a stall fight. Slow and dirty, the 109 pilot could not use his advantage in the vertical and never had a chance.

I think the "BREW", as its icon says, will be one of the dominant fighters in the early war arena, and can hold its own in the others as well.


My regards,

Widewing
My regards,

Widewing

YGBSM. Retired Member of Aces High Trainer Corps, Past President of the DFC, retired from flying as Tredlite.

Offline moot

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 16333
      • http://www.dasmuppets.com
Re: Brewster B-239 and the I-16
« Reply #26 on: June 26, 2009, 10:46:24 PM »
I haven't had so much trouble with brewsters in the I-16 that I'd put it as being out of contention in a knife fight.  I haven't gotten much 1:1 time (too many interruptions), but from what I've seen, the only clear dominance the Brewster has on the I-16 is pure flat turns. 
Hello ant
running very fast
I squish you

Offline gripen

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1914
Re: Brewster B-239 and the I-16
« Reply #27 on: June 26, 2009, 10:54:10 PM »
What US gun package?

Finnish Brewsters had two weapon layouts. Originally with 3 x heavy and 1 x light MGs, which was upgraded to 4 x heavies.

Actually there was three weapon layouts:

1. Original: 3x 12,7mm Colt (MG 53-2) + 1x  7,7mm Colt (MG 40)
2. 4x 12,7mm Colt
3. 2x 12,7mm Colt + 2x 12,7mm Lkk/42 (derivate of 13,2mm FN-Browning, not a copied Colt)

Firepower wise the third layout was about 50% more effective than the second because here in Finland the Colts were set for 550 rpm (factory default) while the LKk/42 did 1000-1100 rpm. The LKk/42s were also in the wings (no synchronisation) so the increased rate of fire was fully utilized.

For the details see Suomen Ilmailuhistoriallinen Lehti 4/2007-3/2008 "VKT 12,70 LKk/42 - ei mikään Coltin kopio" by Pentti Manninen. I sent some documention on this to Pyro but I don't know if the third layout is modeled.
« Last Edit: June 26, 2009, 10:55:51 PM by gripen »

Offline BnZs

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4207
Re: Brewster B-239 and the I-16
« Reply #28 on: June 26, 2009, 11:52:00 PM »
I think the "BREW", as its icon says, will be one of the dominant fighters in the early war arena, and can hold its own in the others as well.


I move that they change the icon from "BREW" to "BUFF". That way the average MAer will shoot at it from dead six instead of trying to HO it.
"Crikey, sir. I'm looking forward to today. Up diddly up, down diddly down, whoops, poop, twiddly dee - decent scrap with the fiendish Red Baron - bit of a jolly old crash landing behind enemy lines - capture, torture, escape, and then back home in time for tea and medals."

Offline Saxman

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9155
Re: Brewster B-239 and the I-16
« Reply #29 on: June 27, 2009, 12:16:31 AM »
I move that they change the icon from "BREW" to "BUFF". That way the average MAer will shoot at it from dead six instead of trying to HO it.

Just got done playing with her for the first time in the Beta arena.

Very stable, incredibly agile and superb rate of roll at all airspeeds, dives like a brick, controls remain responsive even at high speeds, her flaps may be as good as the Corsair's, solid gunnery package, VERY long range. E retention appears to be very good, at least with flaps up. Her only two weaknesses are speed and sustained rate of climb.

I'm calling it now: Perk on the Brewster in EARLY WAR ARENA.
Ron White says you can't fix stupid. I beg to differ. Stupid will usually sort itself out, it's just a matter of making sure you're not close enough to become collateral damage.