Author Topic: College Football  (Read 6266 times)

Offline DMBEAR

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1044
      • JG2 Richtofen
Re: College Football
« Reply #240 on: December 06, 2009, 05:52:21 PM »
LSU 31 Washington 23.

I feel this is all i need to prove my point.  That was a very closely contested game.  The thing is thought washinton finished 7th!!!!!!! in the PAC10.  Where as LSU is proably the 3rd best team in the SEC minus a bonehead coaching move.  The SEC is like many conferences, too top heavy.  THe PAC10 is more of a challenge week in and week out.

I've never seen a game that a SEC team won used more often in forums to try to argue against the SEC.

LSU led 24-13 w/ 6 minutes to play when Washington kicked a field goal to make it 24-16.  LSU then drove and scored to make it 31-16 w/ about 2 minutes left to play.  Jake Locker scored on the games final play to end it 31-23.

Anyways, how did USC do against Washington?


Offline Reschke

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7724
      • VF-17 "The Jolly Rogers"
Re: College Football
« Reply #241 on: December 06, 2009, 06:03:34 PM »
Ok here is my Case for the PAC-10.

The SEC is at the moment a bunch of cupcakes+Alabama, Florida, and LSU.  That is suomething a strong recruiting class will change.

You have lost your mind! Name one other conference that beats itself to pieces each Saturday like the SEC. There is a reason that the majority of the teams are 7 or 8 win teams each year...they play in a conference that has produced...7 National Champions since 1992 and 4 of those have come in the last 6 years with a chance to play for the 5th in that same time frame. Besides the USC + 9 FCS Division teams that is the Pac-10 hasn't been representing itself too well in the last few years. Even back in the old days when USC wasn't the power house they have been recently the other teams haven't stepped or didn't step up to stomp on them any worse than they have this year.
Buckshot
Reschke from March 2001 till tour 146
Founder and CO VF-17 Jolly Rogers September 2002 - December 2006
"I'm baaaaccccckkk!"

Offline fudgums

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3875
Re: College Football
« Reply #242 on: December 06, 2009, 06:06:24 PM »
I like Oregon's loss to Boise State too  :aok
"Masters of the Air" Scenario - JG27

Offline fudgums

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3875
Re: College Football
« Reply #243 on: December 06, 2009, 07:04:13 PM »
Fiesta bowl TCU vs Boise state that sucks  :headscratch:
"Masters of the Air" Scenario - JG27

Offline Pannono

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1101
Re: College Football
« Reply #244 on: December 06, 2009, 07:27:23 PM »
Fiesta bowl TCU vs Boise state that sucks  :headscratch:
That doesnt prove anything for whoever wins.
Midmajor vs Midmajor
Pannono
Proud Member of Pigs On The Wing
8 Player H2H: 2006-07
MA Tours: 87, 97-113, 143-144, 160-Present
FSO: JG54

Offline SkyRock

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7758
Re: College Football
« Reply #245 on: December 06, 2009, 07:48:56 PM »
when the PAC-10 can put all but one of their teams in a bowl game come back and talk about toughest conference in the land.
SEC has ten in bowl games as of today.  I am a Tide fan, so I am biased a bit....but the SEC is one tough freaking conference this year....and I guess the Bowls see this also.  :aok

Triton28 - "...his stats suggest he has a healthy combination of suck and sissy!"

Offline B17Skull12

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3839
Re: College Football
« Reply #246 on: December 06, 2009, 07:55:13 PM »
You have lost your mind! Name one other conference that beats itself to pieces each Saturday like the SEC. There is a reason that the majority of the teams are 7 or 8 win teams each year...they play in a conference that has produced...7 National Champions since 1992 and 4 of those have come in the last 6 years with a chance to play for the 5th in that same time frame. Besides the USC + 9 FCS Division teams that is the Pac-10 hasn't been representing itself too well in the last few years. Even back in the old days when USC wasn't the power house they have been recently the other teams haven't stepped or didn't step up to stomp on them any worse than they have this year.
PAC10.

UCLA who beat a Tennesse team @ Tennesse, that A)gave Florida fits on the road and B)Finished 2 in the SEC East and 4th Overall, finished basically at the bottom of the barrel of the pac 10 with conferences wins.  ASU lost a admitted depleted Georgia team by 3 points.  Lets step back here and look at the big picture.  PAC10 has more quality teams.  This and proably next year than the SEC does.  It may not be a top end heavy, but top to bottom it is a superior conference to the SEC.  The w-l record wont show that though cause the pac10 plays 9 conference games unlike the SEC which get the ability to schedule 1 more cupcake each to help bolster their w-l.  IDK im just not seeing how the SEC is better.  Really.
II/JG3 DGS II

Offline fudgums

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3875
Re: College Football
« Reply #247 on: December 06, 2009, 07:59:39 PM »
PAC10.

UCLA who beat a Tennesse team @ Tennesse, that A)gave Florida fits on the road and B)Finished 2 in the SEC East and 4th Overall, finished basically at the bottom of the barrel of the pac 10 with conferences wins.  ASU lost a admitted depleted Georgia team by 3 points.  Lets step back here and look at the big picture.  PAC10 has more quality teams.  This and proably next year than the SEC does.  It may not be a top end heavy, but top to bottom it is a superior conference to the SEC.  The w-l record wont show that though cause the pac10 plays 9 conference games unlike the SEC which get the ability to schedule 1 more cupcake each to help bolster their w-l.  IDK im just not seeing how the SEC is better.  Really.



*stolen from Grizz long time ago
"Masters of the Air" Scenario - JG27

Offline DMBEAR

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1044
      • JG2 Richtofen
Re: College Football
« Reply #248 on: December 06, 2009, 08:27:44 PM »
Ok.  You all have convinced me that the PAC 10 is the best confernce.

The Pac10 is the best conference this year and will be next year.  I will tell this to all who will listen while I'm cheering on an SEC team to win the 5th Championship in the last 7 years.

That makes perfect sense to me.  :banana:

Offline Hajo

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6031
Re: College Football
« Reply #249 on: December 06, 2009, 09:01:35 PM »
Has anyone in this topic heard an SEC player put together a complete sentence while being interviewed after the game?
Just thought I'd ask. (Tim Tebow does well....althought I'm not an SEC fan there is no denying he is a gentleman.)
- The Flying Circus -

Offline Chapel

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 311
Re: College Football
« Reply #250 on: December 06, 2009, 09:39:42 PM »
A playoff system taking the top 16 settles this once and for all.
Rolling Thunder

Offline DMBEAR

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1044
      • JG2 Richtofen
Re: College Football
« Reply #251 on: December 06, 2009, 09:50:54 PM »
Has anyone in this topic heard an SEC player put together a complete sentence while being interviewed after the game?
Just thought I'd ask. (Tim Tebow does well....althought I'm not an SEC fan there is no denying he is a gentleman.)

Hajo, are you an Ohio St. fan? I'm thinking you were.

If you are you'll have to scroll down to the bottom of this chart.

Regardless, bringing up how stupid the players are in another conference is always a last resort when your conference is not winning.   When your Buckeyes are 0-9 all time in Bowls vs. the SEC I can understand you are reaching...when your graduation rate is bottom 10 it sounds kind of foolish.


2008 NCAA Graduation Success Rate for BCS Football Programs

1. Notre Dame 94%
2. Stanford 93
T3. BC 92
T3. Duke 92
T3. Northwestern 92
6. Vanderbilt 91
7. Wake Forest 83
8. Texas Tech 79
T9. Baylor 78
T9. Nebraska 78
T9. UNC 78
T9. Penn State 78
T13. UConn 77
T13. Indiana 77
T15. Colorado 75
T15. Iowa 75
T15. Syracuse 75
T15. Virginia Tech 75
19. Cincinnati 73
T20. Illinois 70
T20. Michigan 70
T20. Miami 70
T20. Rutgers 70
24. Florida State 69
T25. Clemson 68
T25. Florida 68
T25. Maryland 68
T25. Wash State 68
............................. ............
T29. Kansas State 67
T29. Pitt 67
31. Virginia 66
T32. South Carolina 65
T32. Washington 65
T34. Oregon State 64
T34. Ole Miss 63
T34. Miss State 63
T34. Purdue 63
T34. West Virginia 63
T34. Wisconsin 63
T40. Okla State 62
T40. UCLA 62
42. Arizona State 60
T43. N.C. State 59
T43. Missouri 59
45. Louisville 58
46. Auburn 57
T47. Kentucky 56
T47. Texas A&M 56
T47. South Florida 56
T50. Alabama 55
T50. Iowa State 55
T52. LSU 54
T52. Tennessee 54
T52. USC 54
T55. Cal 53
T55. Oregon 53
T55. Kansas 53
58. Ohio State 52
T58. Arkansas 52
T60. Minnesota 51
T60. Michigan State 51
62. Texas 50
T63. Georgia 48
T63. Georgia Tech 48
65. Oklahoma 46
66. Arizona 41

Offline DMBEAR

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1044
      • JG2 Richtofen
Re: College Football
« Reply #252 on: December 06, 2009, 09:53:54 PM »
LOL , I didn't realize they were mine.

I guess I thought you claimed Texas and thus were a Big12 fan....

          HOOK EM !

(Image removed from quote.)




Offline Pannono

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1101
Re: College Football
« Reply #253 on: December 06, 2009, 10:22:39 PM »
Fiesta Bowl =  :huh

WHY? Still cant believe they screwed up so bad. I knew they would do it, but I still hoped they wouldnt.
« Last Edit: December 06, 2009, 10:24:16 PM by Pannono »
Pannono
Proud Member of Pigs On The Wing
8 Player H2H: 2006-07
MA Tours: 87, 97-113, 143-144, 160-Present
FSO: JG54

Offline oakranger

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8379
      • http://www.slybirds.com/
Re: College Football
« Reply #254 on: December 06, 2009, 10:40:23 PM »
Hajo, are you an Ohio St. fan? I'm thinking you were.

If you are you'll have to scroll down to the bottom of this chart.

Regardless, bringing up how stupid the players are in another conference is always a last resort when your conference is not winning.   When your Buckeyes are 0-9 all time in Bowls vs. the SEC I can understand you are reaching...when your graduation rate is bottom 10 it sounds kind of foolish.


2008 NCAA Graduation Success Rate for BCS Football Programs

1. Notre Dame 94%
2. Stanford 93
T3. BC 92
T3. Duke 92
T3. Northwestern 92
6. Vanderbilt 91
7. Wake Forest 83
8. Texas Tech 79
T9. Baylor 78
T9. Nebraska 78
T9. UNC 78
T9. Penn State 78
T13. UConn 77
T13. Indiana 77
T15. Colorado 75
T15. Iowa 75
T15. Syracuse 75
T15. Virginia Tech 75
19. Cincinnati 73
T20. Illinois 70
T20. Michigan 70
T20. Miami 70
T20. Rutgers 70
24. Florida State 69
T25. Clemson 68
T25. Florida 68
T25. Maryland 68
T25. Wash State 68
............................. ............
T29. Kansas State 67
T29. Pitt 67
31. Virginia 66
T32. South Carolina 65
T32. Washington 65
T34. Oregon State 64
T34. Ole Miss 63
T34. Miss State 63
T34. Purdue 63
T34. West Virginia 63
T34. Wisconsin 63
T40. Okla State 62
T40. UCLA 62
42. Arizona State 60
T43. N.C. State 59
T43. Missouri 59
45. Louisville 58
46. Auburn 57
T47. Kentucky 56
T47. Texas A&M 56
T47. South Florida 56
T50. Alabama 55
T50. Iowa State 55
T52. LSU 54
T52. Tennessee 54
T52. USC 54
T55. Cal 53
T55. Oregon 53
T55. Kansas 53
58. Ohio State 52
T58. Arkansas 52
T60. Minnesota 51
T60. Michigan State 51
62. Texas 50
T63. Georgia 48
T63. Georgia Tech 48
65. Oklahoma 46
66. Arizona 41



Well, they are above Texas and Oklahoma so i guess that is a plus. 
Oaktree

56th Fighter group