Author Topic: Whaler ship cuts USS PETA Batboat in two  (Read 5053 times)

Offline Masherbrum

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 22408
Re: Whaler ship cuts USS PETA Batboat in two
« Reply #75 on: January 08, 2010, 01:08:55 AM »
If you cant see the morons werent looking to get a you tube clip your a bigger moron than they are. Wow. Talk about colossal failure.

 :rofl :rofl
-=Most Wanted=-

FSO Squad 412th FNVG
http://worldfamousfridaynighters.com/
Co-Founder of DFC

Offline Demetrious

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 108
Re: Whaler ship cuts USS PETA Batboat in two
« Reply #76 on: January 08, 2010, 01:36:19 AM »
So you think 911 was a good effort then and all those NYFD firefighters deserved to die.

Oh, look, a false comparision, wrapping yourself in the flag, and calling me a terrorist sympathizer to boot. ("So you think 911 was a good effort," etc.) You might wanna throttle back your righteous indignation there friend, before you say something you don't mean.

As for the discussion of if the whaler rammed the Sea Shepard's boat, I posit that the weight of evidence points to a staged event by Sea Shepard: (Sources taken from a well sourced Wikipedia article:

1. Sea Shepard has a well-documented history of actively seeking violent confrontation, including using ramming as a technique:

a. Sea Shepherd spent part of 1979 hunting for the whaling ship Sierra which was notorious for having undetermined ownership, ignoring whaling agreements, hunting indiscriminately, and using non-explosive harpoons.[78] To increase the effect of a ramming the bow of the Sea Shepherd was filled with approximately 100 tonnes of cement. In July, the Sierra was found off the port of Oporto, Portugal. Sea Shepherd put non-essential crew ashore and manned by three crew (Paul Watson, Peter Woof, and Jerry Doran), returned to ram and cripple the Sierra.

b. While in Lisbon in February 1980, the Sierra was sunk with limpet mines.[81] The Sierra's chief engineer, Luis Mendes, told reporters that he believed "the blast was set by crew members of the Sea Shepherd."[81] In a 2004 interview Paul Watson said, "Meanwhile, the Sierra had been repaired and was ready to return to sea. It never did so: on February 6, 1980, my crew blew the bottom out of her and permanently ended her career. We traded a ship for a ship, but it was a great trade because we also traded our ship for the lives of hundreds of whales."[82]

I want you to take SPECIAL NOTE of Paul Watson claiming responsibility for the LIMPET MINING OF A SHIP IN HARBOR TO ENSURE IT'S DESTRUCTION. Apparently they learned from the French.

c. In April 1980, explosives were used to sink the whalers Isba I and Isba II in Vigo, Spain. Watson said that the boats were "victims of magnetic mines, one of them homemade, which had been planted by the same trio that destroyed the Sierra."[83] Sea Shepherd does show these vessels on the tally of vessels "sunk" on the side of the Farley Mowat and the back of some Sea Shepherd shirts. The whalers Susan and Theresa are also shown on these tallies. No one was injured during the attacks.[33]

TWO MORE INCIDENTS of self-admittedly using explosives to sink civilian fishing vessels.

d. In the summer of 1982, Watson offered a reporter an exclusive story on the group's plan to ram a Russian vessel. The reporter informed authorities and the ramming did not take place.

e. Between December 2005 and January 2006, a crew of 43 aboard the Farley Mowat attempted to stop the Japanese whaling fleet in the Southern Ocean. During the campaign, the Farley Mowat 'sideswiped' a Japanese supply ship called the Oriental Bluebird. No damage or injuries were reported.[119] New Zealand Conservation Minister Chris Carter criticized Sea Shepherd as irresponsible for using tactics such as running into the other vessel with a "can opener" device, a seven-foot steel blade on the starboard bow designed to damage the hull of an enemy ship.

2. Despite the above, Sea Shepard has a history of blaming others for trying to attack them to stir up media sympathy:

a. Watson's public relations savvy is shown in an episode of Whale Wars when he creates an international media "storm" after two crewmembers are detained on a Japanese whaling vessel.[31] In his book, Earthforce!, Watson advises readers to make up facts and figures when they need to, and to deliver them to reporters confidently.[5] He also states that the "truth is irrelevant" due the nature of mass media.[32]

b. On January 15, 2008, after attempting to entangle the whaling vessel's propeller and throwing containers of butyric acid onto the decks,[123] two Sea Shepherd members, Benjamin Potts and Giles Lane, from the Sea Shepherd vessel MV Steve Irwin boarded the Japanese whaling vessel Yushin Maru No. 2 from a rigid-hulled inflatable boat. The pair were delivering a letter advising the Japanese that they were "whaling illegally"[124] with the hope of creating an international incident.[125] The Japanese responded by saying that the men would be held until Sea Shepherd stopped what they called "dangerous and illegal activities."[126]... The crew of the Yushin Maru No. 2 detained the men for two days, before turning them over to the Australian customs vessel MV Oceanic Viking on the orders of Japanese authorities[124]; subsequently, the Steve Irwin rendezvoused with the Oceanic Viking and the two crewmembers were returned to Sea Shepherd.[123][127][128] On April 9, first mate Peter Brown was described in a newspaper article as saying that the incident only became a hostage situation because the Sea Shepherd vessel left the scene, so the Japanese would be forced to hold the two crewmen longer. He was quoted as saying, "It's all giant street theater."[129]

c. On 29 March 2008 the MV Farley Mowat and a Canadian Coast Guard ship collided.[73] The coast guard icebreaker had put itself between the Farley Mowat and a smaller seal hunter's boat. The group says their vessel was rammed while the Canadian Fisheries and Oceans department says the coast guard ship was grazed by the Farley Mowat.[74]

Note, accusation of a ramming. Does anybody here want to accuse the Canadian Coast Guard of deliberately trying to ram an unarmed vessel?

3. Sea Shepard has engaged in multiple acts of sabotage.

a. In late December 1992, O.R.C.A Force (Sea Shepherd) sabotaged the whaler Nybraena in response to Norway's decision to resume commercial whaling of minke whales in 1993. Police found the vessel's engine room nearly full of water at her moorings in the Lofoten Islands but were able to keep it afloat.[91]

b. In November 1986, the Sea Shepherd Conservation Society claimed responsibility for actions against a whaling station in Hvalfjörður, Iceland. Computers were destroyed with sledgehammers and records were doused with acid. The Hvalur 6 and Hvalur 7, two of the nation's four whaling ships, were sunk by opening their seaaxles while they were moored in Reykjavík harbour.[104][105][106]

This is, of course, in addition to the SINKINGS OF VESSELS WITH EXPLOSIVE CHARGES.

Given all of this... do you really think the Whaler is at fault in this latest incident?
« Last Edit: January 08, 2010, 01:38:06 AM by Demetrious »

Offline Chalenge

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15179
Re: Whaler ship cuts USS PETA Batboat in two
« Reply #77 on: January 08, 2010, 01:58:37 AM »
Pirates at sea should be hung or shot dead.  :aok
If you like the Sick Puppy Custom Sound Pack the please consider contributing for future updates by sending a months dues to Hitech Creations for account "Chalenge." Every little bit helps.

Offline Getback

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6364
Re: Whaler ship cuts USS PETA Batboat in two
« Reply #78 on: January 08, 2010, 02:04:59 AM »
Why in half? Why not quarters!

  Created by MyFitnessPal.com - Free Calorie Counter

Offline Vulcan

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9891
Re: Whaler ship cuts USS PETA Batboat in two
« Reply #79 on: January 08, 2010, 02:37:45 AM »
Oh, look, a false comparision, wrapping yourself in the flag, and calling me a terrorist sympathizer to boot. ("So you think 911 was a good effort," etc.) You might wanna throttle back your righteous indignation there friend, before you say something you don't mean.
...

Given all of this... do you really think the Whaler is at fault in this latest incident?

That is totally irrelevant, I was referring to your comments support the terrorist bombing by french agents of a civilian ship in a NZ port. That ship was involved in protesting the testing of nuclear weapons in the south pacific. One of the few causes I actually support greenpeace on (if the french want to test their nukes test em in their own back yard). Note that greenpeaces activities during these protests were non-violent.

So, do you support terrorist bombings of civilians when that countries citizens disagree with your countries policies? If you support the french government in such an action then you must support the Taliban's (govt of afghanistan at the time) involvement in 911. Or the bombing the the 747 over Lockerbie by Libyan agents?

p.s. if you took some literacy classes instead of cut'n'paste classes you might have observed I believe this was both their fault.


Offline TwinEng

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 286
Re: Whaler ship cuts USS PETA Batboat in two
« Reply #80 on: January 08, 2010, 02:40:31 AM »
The whalers still suck.

Dude:

The Japanese have been eating Whale meat for over 900 years.  

What would you do if someone told you that you could not eat at McDonald's anymore??   Would you not consider that to be un-American?

.

Offline Demetrious

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 108
Re: Whaler ship cuts USS PETA Batboat in two
« Reply #81 on: January 08, 2010, 03:00:24 AM »
That is totally irrelevant... if you took some literacy classes instead of cut'n'paste classes you might have observed I believe this was both their fault.

I was addressing the topic of the thread in general, not this side argument.
« Last Edit: January 08, 2010, 03:02:14 AM by Demetrious »

Offline Rolex

  • AH Training Corps
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3285
Re: Whaler ship cuts USS PETA Batboat in two
« Reply #82 on: January 08, 2010, 04:06:04 AM »
The video from the Japanese ship after the collision shows its wake - it was turning to port to avoid the (now sunken) terrorist ship. The Japanese whalers are doing nothing "illegal." Their whale take is allowed under international agreements, being done in international waters and they are taking minke whales, which are not an endangered species.

It's seems like hypocrisy to not be similarly outraged at all of the illegal harvesting of lamb chops, rib eyes, plump pork sausages, prancing deer steaks, jumpy trout fillets, perky perch fish & chips, luscious lobsters, seasoned crabs, buttery shrimp, savory salmon, tasty tuna salad and chubby chicken breasts devoured by criminal humans every day. Outraged!

I'm hungry now . . .

Offline SirFrancis

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 413
Re: Whaler ship cuts USS PETA Batboat in two
« Reply #83 on: January 08, 2010, 04:51:56 AM »
 :rofl :rofl

nice vid of sea shepherds boat ramming and than get stuck on an iceberg...

-> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KDsZcLVXyn8&feature=related

Regards
SF
‘CO2…makes the planet greener’

Offline -tronski-

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2825
Re: Whaler ship cuts USS PETA Batboat in two
« Reply #84 on: January 08, 2010, 06:17:04 AM »
meh send an Australian warship down to arrest and detain Japanese whalers illegally fishing in our sovereign waters and there wouldn't have been a problem...at least there

 Tronsky
God created Arrakis to train the faithful

Offline allaire

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1239
Re: Whaler ship cuts USS PETA Batboat in two
« Reply #85 on: January 08, 2010, 07:27:05 AM »
:rofl :rofl

nice vid of sea shepherds boat ramming and than get stuck on an iceberg...

-> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KDsZcLVXyn8&feature=related

Regards
SF

Must be the reincarnated Captain Edward John Smith.
"I drank what?" -Socrates

Offline PFactorDave

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4334
Re: Whaler ship cuts USS PETA Batboat in two
« Reply #86 on: January 08, 2010, 08:14:58 AM »
They are a resource to the world's oceans ... they cause balance within the oceans.

I'm sure your boss considers you a resource to the company ... let me know when I can come and harvest you.

Poppycock!

The boss that considers an employee as an asset does reap a "harvest" from the work done by that employee.   By your argument, the boss/company should not be allowed to benefit from the employees work, but said employee should be allowed to show up for work everyday anyway simply so the same number of doughnuts would be eaten in the employee break room every morning.

I've always wondered what role whales supposedly play in the ecology of the ocean?  Is their primary role the reduction of plankton?  Or are they a primary food source for a predator species?  Are there enough of them left to actually affect either?  Precisely what balance would be upset if they were extinct? 

Don't mistake me, I'm not saying that we should allow them to be hunted to extinction in an way shape or form...  I just don't see any real evidence that whales play an important role in this mysterious "balance" of which you speak.

1st Lieutenant
FSO Liaison Officer
Rolling Thunder

Offline PJ_Godzilla

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2661
Re: Whaler ship cuts USS PETA Batboat in two
« Reply #87 on: January 08, 2010, 08:44:52 AM »
Looks to me like the batboat cut in front of the whaler bow.

http://video.foxnews.com/v/3961607/protest-ship-smashed-in-whaling-clash

SYDNEY —  A conservation group's boat had its bow sheared off and was in danger of sinking as it took on water Wednesday after it was struck by a Japanese whaling ship in the frigid waters of Antarctica, the group said.

The boat's six crew members were safely transferred to another of the Sea Shepherd Conservation Society's vessels, the newly commissioned Bob Barker. The boat is named for the American game show host who donated $5 million to buy it.

The clash was the most serious in the past several years, during which the Sea Shepherd has sent vessels into far-southern waters to try to harass the Japanese fleet into ceasing its annual whale hunt.....
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,582115,00.html?test=latestnews

Regards,
Sun





I laughed 'til I peed my rubber suit. If you've watched "Whale Wars" at all, you know these little roostersuckers have had it coming for some time. They harass the Japanese vessels and then get upset when they screw themselves up.

The Japanese vessels are whaling legally. Regard for any form of rules doesn't seem to feature in the little communist Sea Shepherd's conduct.

I hope they all die down there.

Further, the little ankle-holding pillow-biters LIED about the cause, claiming their boat was at idle when "rammed". Happily, the Japanese videotaped the whole thing, clearly showing the commie cadre of little rimdrivers cutting off the Japanese vessel.

Standing there with soiled Grampers holding his deeeck is Bob Barker, who paid for the "Ady Gil" (a granola-munching collective-farmer name if ever there was one, it probably stinks of old birks) and now regrets it. I guess he didn't realize that Paul T*Watson is a puffy-drunken old fat slob, bent on destroying a legal and productive venture.

meh send an Australian warship down to arrest and detain Japanese whalers illegally fishing in our sovereign waters and there wouldn't have been a problem...at least there

 Tronsky


The Japanese vessel wasn't in Australian sovereign waters, merely waters over which Aus/NZ have safety authority.  The Aus government's statement was pretty limp-wristed:

"The government is very concerned at this collision," Australian Environment Minister Peter Garrett said. "We condemn any dangerous or violent activity that takes place in the southern oceans. Safety at sea is an absolute priority in this dangerous and inhospitable ocean area."

In any case, imj, enviros and animal right's activists are today's luddite religious zealots. There is no reasoning mit zese subhumans. They should be rounded up und slaughtered in zee arbeitslageren. Das ist der endlosung!
« Last Edit: January 08, 2010, 08:48:19 AM by PJ_Godzilla »
Some say revenge is a dish best served cold. I say it's usually best served hot, chunky, and foaming. Eventually, you will all die in my vengeance vomit firestorm.

Offline fudgums

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3929
Re: Whaler ship cuts USS PETA Batboat in two
« Reply #88 on: January 08, 2010, 08:48:24 AM »
Dude:

The Japanese have been eating Whale meat for over 900 years.  

What would you do if someone told you that you could not eat at McDonald's anymore??   Would you not consider that to be un-American?

.

We have Mcdonalds? All I see is KFC.
"Masters of the Air" Scenario - JG27

Offline PJ_Godzilla

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2661
Re: Whaler ship cuts USS PETA Batboat in two
« Reply #89 on: January 08, 2010, 08:54:31 AM »
Poppycock!

The boss that considers an employee as an asset does reap a "harvest" from the work done by that employee.   By your argument, the boss/company should not be allowed to benefit from the employees work, but said employee should be allowed to show up for work everyday anyway simply so the same number of doughnuts would be eaten in the employee break room every morning.

I've always wondered what role whales supposedly play in the ecology of the ocean?  Is their primary role the reduction of plankton?  Or are they a primary food source for a predator species?  Are there enough of them left to actually affect either?  Precisely what balance would be upset if they were extinct? 

Don't mistake me, I'm not saying that we should allow them to be hunted to extinction in an way shape or form...  I just don't see any real evidence that whales play an important role in this mysterious "balance" of which you speak.

I'd like to see a good answer to that one as well. I always hear some exceedingly fuzzy argument regarding that and some canary in the coal mine argument. I doubt either would survive serious scrutiny.

I'd also like to see the means by which these eco-chupadores estimate the size of the whale population. It's probably as shammy as East Anglia's climate "data". Part of the reason I say as much is because of direct experience with both Mountain Lions and Golden Eagles in Southeast Michigan. Neither are officially here per the DNR and Audubon societies, respectively, yet there is ample evidence (including, in the case of the Golden Eagle, an unmistakeable encounter I had with one just outside of Ann Arbor) that both still exist here in the lower peninsula of Michigan.
Some say revenge is a dish best served cold. I say it's usually best served hot, chunky, and foaming. Eventually, you will all die in my vengeance vomit firestorm.