Author Topic: How about another alternative to the C47?  (Read 403 times)

Offline Staga

  • Parolee
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5334
      • http://www.nohomersclub.com/
How about another alternative to the C47?
« Reply #15 on: July 13, 2001, 05:56:00 AM »
btw Lisunov was about 20-30mph slower than C-47 so it could be nice trade-off:
With C-47 you get more speed w/out defensive armament but in Li-2 less speed but few light mg's to defend your plane.

Anyway Me-323 could bring some new possibilities in gameplay like carrying vehicles to distant enemy bases...

Offline Replicant

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3567
How about another alternative to the C47?
« Reply #16 on: July 13, 2001, 06:57:00 PM »
Ju52 or the Armstrong Whitworth Albemarle.  This plane was used in a variety of different tasks - bomber, target tug, transport, troop carrier, etc....  It was also used by many allied countries including Britain, France, Soviet Union etc.

   

Also  http://www.marketgarden.com/new/aircraft/albemanle.htm

Regards

Nexx

BTW  Whichever plane you chose I think it would still only carry 10 troops... remember that a real C47 could carry around 25 - 30 troops.

[ 07-13-2001: Message edited by: Replicant ]
NEXX

Offline Fishu

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3789
How about another alternative to the C47?
« Reply #17 on: July 15, 2001, 09:11:00 AM »
Before any yankee C's, wouldn't Ju52 be ideal addition  :)

Offline brady

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7055
      • http://personal.jax.bellsouth.net/jax/t/y/tyr88/JG2main.html
How about another alternative to the C47?
« Reply #18 on: July 15, 2001, 09:24:00 AM »



The JU 52 would be cool no doubt, but the Tabby with it's slightly better spead than the C47 and better defensive arament( one 13mm Type 2 and two 7.7mm Type 92MG's.487 of them being built.)than the JU 52 would be very nice indead.

[ 07-15-2001: Message edited by: brady ]

[ 07-15-2001: Message edited by: brady ]