I don't see what Fencer has to elaborate on.
Ooze asked a question, Oneway answered like he was part of the action, process and decision. He didn't ask squat Kermit.
Fencer is a big boy, can probably answer his own questions about his own server. Considering anyone can comment on anything, I thought I'd stick my nose in where it didn't belong as well 
I was in a rush when I made that post. Oops. OOZ asked the question, which has been answered by Fencer.
I don't think 0neway is unappreciative of the TS Server, but it may have come across that way. Yes, 0neway is saying he thinks the TS is unsuitable for use during the actual frames in Scenarios by all GLs, XO and COs on both sides at same time due to it's 25 user limit, but he may feel that this situation is fine. Most TS server activity has occurred during planning gatherings rather than during the frames, so this is still a great planning tool, which is greatly appreciated. Many players have stated TS doesn't work well when AH is running. Usually this is just a settings issue, but sometimes it's a gameplay issue due to TS audio playing while AH Vox is heard, which is like trying to listen to two people talking at the same time.
Anyway, I think the majority would agree 25 max total users is fine for planning or even during actual frame usage. If the CMs gave us no TS, that would be fine, so anything greater than 2 per side is appreciative, even more so once we learned a CM is paying out of own pocket.
I hope I stated this POV in a polite way. Last thing I want to do is create an argument over a great and much appreciated gift from CM to us players.
