Author Topic: New divebomber  (Read 1980 times)

Offline DEECONX

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1502
Re: New divebomber
« Reply #15 on: July 19, 2010, 07:19:04 PM »
Agreed  :aok
Not to mention it would be great for knocking out hangers/CV's with the 2,000 pounder :x

Don't forget the 500's either!

Offline jolly22

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1587
Re: New divebomber
« Reply #16 on: July 19, 2010, 07:40:53 PM »
PLEASE!!!!!!!!!!!! PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE!!!!!!!!!!!!!

3./JG 53 cheerleader - Battle Over The Winter Line - FLY AXIS - JRjolly

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23047
Re: New divebomber
« Reply #17 on: July 19, 2010, 07:56:44 PM »
God help this thread. Karnak will be here soon. We already have the p51, p47 and p38. Not to mention the SBD, F4U and F6F...
Meh.  I am tired.  10 hour day and mandatory 6 day weeks.

If they add it, maybe it will be modeled to be a handling nightmare to make you long for your old SBD-5.  Also, maybe if it is added some Japanese strike aircraft that actually entered service after Pearl might be added.
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline fbWldcat

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2970
Re: New divebomber
« Reply #18 on: July 19, 2010, 07:58:44 PM »
Sorry to hear about the hours, Karnak.

My thoughts summed up.
Landing is overrated.
"Two roads diverged in a wood, and I: I took the one less traveled by." - Robert Frost
"Uncommon valor was a common virtue." <S>

Offline AWwrgwy

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5478
Re: New divebomber
« Reply #19 on: July 19, 2010, 09:59:41 PM »
Meh.  I am tired.  10 hour day and mandatory 6 day weeks.

If they add it, maybe it will be modeled to be a handling nightmare to make you long for your old SBD-5.  .

Just like real life.   :aok

But remember, it gots canunz.

 :old:


wrongway
71 (Eagle) Squadron
"THAT"S PAINT!!"

"If nothing else works, a total pig-headed unwillingness to look facts in the face will see us through."
- General Sir Anthony Cecil Hogmanay

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23047
Re: New divebomber
« Reply #20 on: July 19, 2010, 10:02:03 PM »
Just like real life.   :aok

But remember, it gots canunz.

 :old:


wrongway

You're right.

Here's the bargain for Karnak's support:

SB2C and B7A2 at the same time.  Dey bof have cannunz and dey can fitez eachother.
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline Ack-Ack

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 25260
      • FlameWarriors
Re: New divebomber
« Reply #21 on: July 19, 2010, 10:13:28 PM »
Meh.  I am tired.  10 hour day and mandatory 6 day weeks.

If they add it, maybe it will be modeled to be a handling nightmare to make you long for your old SBD-5.  Also, maybe if it is added some Japanese strike aircraft that actually entered service after Pearl might be added.

Depends which Helldiver.  The problems that plagued the earlier variants (underpowered, crappy electrical system, crappy construction, short range, crappy hydraulic system, problems with propellor) were fixed with the SB2C-4.

ack-ack
"If Jesus came back as an airplane, he would be a P-38." - WW2 P-38 pilot
Elite Top Aces +1 Mexican Official Squadron Song

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23047
Re: New divebomber
« Reply #22 on: July 19, 2010, 10:18:18 PM »
Depends which Helldiver.  The problems that plagued the earlier variants (underpowered, crappy electrical system, crappy construction, short range, crappy hydraulic system, problems with propellor) were fixed with the SB2C-4.

ack-ack
It would be funny to see the US get a crappy, early version of one of their aircraft for once.
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline Volron

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5805
Re: New divebomber
« Reply #23 on: July 19, 2010, 10:28:28 PM »
It would be funny to see the US get a crappy, early version of one of their aircraft for once.

I think the TBD Devastator would fit that bill.  I would say the D4Y Judy would be a fun add though.
Quote from: hitech
Wow I find it hard to believe it has been almost 38 days since our last path. We should have release another 38 versions by now  :bhead
HiTech
Quote from: Pyro
Quote from: Jolly
What on Earth makes you think that i said that sir?!
My guess would be scotch.

Offline Guppy35

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 20385
Re: New divebomber
« Reply #24 on: July 20, 2010, 01:10:11 AM »
It would be funny to see the US get a crappy, early version of one of their aircraft for once.

LOL, you mean like the P40B, P39D, F4F etc?  What other early birds would there be beyond a shark fin B17, Devastator, Allison Mustang?

Come on now Karnak, your long hours are making you cranky.  You got your Mossie fixed.  What else do you need? :)
Dan/CorkyJr
8th FS "Headhunters

Offline STXAce8

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 724
Re: New divebomber
« Reply #25 on: July 20, 2010, 08:27:55 AM »
I do say it would be nice, it was faster with more of a payload than a SBD. It also had to 20mm in stead of 2 50s in a SBD. +1








    Ace8
ZLA- Don't Focke Wulf Us!
Ingame: Batz
Kommando Nowotny
Its over the top as Fack

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23047
Re: New divebomber
« Reply #26 on: July 20, 2010, 05:47:55 PM »
LOL, you mean like the P40B, P39D, F4F etc?  What other early birds would there be beyond a shark fin B17, Devastator, Allison Mustang?

Come on now Karnak, your long hours are making you cranky.  You got your Mossie fixed.  What else do you need? :)
I don't want to take anything from the US planeset, but.....

Imagine a B-17E instead of a B-17G.
How about a B-24D rather than a B-24J.
An SBD-3 in place of the SBD-5.
TBD-1 to fill the role of the TBM-3.


I wouldn't agree with all of those changes, but some of them are comparable to the situation that, say, some Japanese aircraft are in.
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline Guppy35

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 20385
Re: New divebomber
« Reply #27 on: July 21, 2010, 12:49:36 AM »
Well you know me, I prefer the early to the later.  I'm much prefer a B17E or F to the G and a B24D would be just fine :)
 
I'd also like a map of the Southwest Pacific covering Australia New Guiniea, Rabaul and the Solomons so we could fight that time in the war.  Give me Bettys and Oscars, the occasional Dinah for the Japanese.  I'll need my RAAF Beaufighters to go with the RAAF P40Es and Spit V

Put me at the historical base for the 80th Headhunters at that time and lets have at it.  I'd love to have a map that allowed me to see the historical terrain and to permit the most immersion flying possible.

Wonder if we could get enough guys to move into the other roles needed for A20 and B25CStrafer pilots, C47 drivers, P39s, P40s

A couple of good runs to Rabaul would be fun too.

Wonder if anyone else would want to play out that kind of tour :)
Dan/CorkyJr
8th FS "Headhunters

Offline jay

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 889
Re: New divebomber
« Reply #28 on: July 21, 2010, 06:03:34 AM »
If they add it, maybe it will be modeled to be a handling nightmare

if i recall reading somwhere pilots that flew the SBD HATED the helldiver.....somthing about ripping the tail section off when pulling up from a dive  :noid
"He who makes a beast of himself Gets rid of the pain of being a man." Dr.Johnson


Offline TOMCAT21

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1648
Re: New divebomber
« Reply #29 on: July 21, 2010, 08:16:27 AM »
+2 to what Corky, errr Guppy said.Rabaul would be a nice scenario. In fact, I just started reading a book called " Fortress Rabaul'..
RETIRED US Army/ Flying and dying since Tour 80/"We're paratroopers, Lieutenant, we're supposed to be surrounded." - Capt. Richard Winters.  FSO 412th FNVG/MA- REGULATORS