funk that, it'll just be another hangar queen that nobody wants to use...except for in scenarios.
also hoping for the b-29 variant which can defend itself, As is i would much rather use the candlestick b-24 or the less ord carrying b-17 rather than the lancaster. Doesn't matter if a plane can carry 50,000lbs of ord if it won't ever make it to the target.
Also another thing whats with lancaster tail gunners dieing soo easily, it sux so much being at 25k in perfectly good lancs with dead tail gunners. getting bb'd to death because all other positions are useless. Can't count how many times I've had all tail gunners destroyed on a single pass, great nothing left to do but sit here an "take it" while the 109f takes its sweet time killing all my undefendable bombers. Hek wouldn't some other crew member be able to shimmy there way to that gun position to man the .50cal 
Please, oh please, go do some research on tail gunners in Lancasters. It's not so simple as to just hop back to the tail. Remove the dead crewman and repair the damaged turrets under those circumstances. Who is going to do it? Mid upper? Flight engineer is busy helping the pilot. Nav? Might need him
Might want to learn "Corkscrew Port Go!"
Try Max Hastings book "Bomber COmmand", Martin Middlebrooks book "The Nuremburg Raid" and Chaz Bowyers book "Guns in the sky" to help you at least gain a clue as to what you are talking about
