Author Topic: LST ( landing ship,tank  (Read 4158 times)

Offline 321BAR

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6140
Re: LST ( landing ship,tank
« Reply #30 on: January 03, 2011, 07:25:02 PM »
I think my argument is going right over your head BAR.

Could someone please help him out with this?
what monkey said. it was never over my head. you just need to see that it would most likely be a loadout selection in the hangar as what to drive off the LST. and this will not include any other armor but american/british
I am in need of a new epic quote
Happy Jack's Go Buggy

Offline M0nkey_Man

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2254
Re: LST ( landing ship,tank
« Reply #31 on: January 03, 2011, 07:25:47 PM »
what monkey said. it was never over my head. you just need to see that it would most likely be a loadout selection in the hangar as what to drive off the LST. and this will not include any other armor but american/british
:aok
FlyKommando.com


"Tip of the dull butter knife"
delta07

Offline skorpion

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3798
Re: LST ( landing ship,tank
« Reply #32 on: January 03, 2011, 08:20:18 PM »
what monkey said. it was never over my head. you just need to see that it would most likely be a loadout selection in the hangar as what to drive off the LST. and this will not include any other armor but american/british
what "british" armor do we have other than the firefly?

Offline M0nkey_Man

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2254
Re: LST ( landing ship,tank
« Reply #33 on: January 03, 2011, 09:21:24 PM »
Brits used the M8, and Sherman tanks...
FlyKommando.com


"Tip of the dull butter knife"
delta07

Offline M0nkey_Man

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2254
Re: LST ( landing ship,tank
« Reply #34 on: January 03, 2011, 09:22:48 PM »
and he never said there was more than one type of British armor that we use in AH  :P
FlyKommando.com


"Tip of the dull butter knife"
delta07

Offline 321BAR

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6140
Re: LST ( landing ship,tank
« Reply #35 on: January 04, 2011, 12:25:20 AM »
what "british" armor do we have other than the firefly?
just because i said brit doesnt mean i thought more than the firefly was brit.. second, much later on in this game's development there will most likely be crusaders/cromwells/comets/churchills too... :rolleyes: why must everyone argue with me? :rolleyes:
I am in need of a new epic quote
Happy Jack's Go Buggy

Offline skorpion

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3798
Re: LST ( landing ship,tank
« Reply #36 on: January 04, 2011, 03:31:35 PM »
just because i said brit doesnt mean i thought more than the firefly was brit.. second, much later on in this game's development there will most likely be crusaders/cromwells/comets/churchills too... :rolleyes: why must everyone argue with me? :rolleyes:
well this is the BBS what do you expect? arguing is in almost every wishlist thread...

Offline M0nkey_Man

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2254
Re: LST ( landing ship,tank
« Reply #37 on: January 04, 2011, 05:06:48 PM »
true
FlyKommando.com


"Tip of the dull butter knife"
delta07

Offline BigKev03

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 256
Re: LST ( landing ship,tank
« Reply #38 on: January 04, 2011, 05:12:56 PM »
A simple solution to this might be to allow the LST in the game but not allow it to land vehicles unless the nearby base is dropped to a certain level (i.e. nor ord, no radar, no troops, etc, etc).  This would represent the fact that LST's did not land and drop their vehicles until a beach head was established.  I know this is not the nest solution if at all a solution but it may open up other ideas to this concept but still keeping it histoical in the fact that LST's did not hit the beach until after assualt troops had cleared the beach and moved inland.  LST does stand for Large Slow Target!!!!

BigKev

Offline 321BAR

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6140
Re: LST ( landing ship,tank
« Reply #39 on: January 04, 2011, 07:42:34 PM »
A simple solution to this might be to allow the LST in the game but not allow it to land vehicles unless the nearby base is dropped to a certain level (i.e. nor ord, no radar, no troops, etc, etc).  This would represent the fact that LST's did not land and drop their vehicles until a beach head was established.  I know this is not the nest solution if at all a solution but it may open up other ideas to this concept but still keeping it histoical in the fact that LST's did not hit the beach until after assualt troops had cleared the beach and moved inland.  LST does stand for Large Slow Target!!!!

BigKev
scratch this idea... one word "perks" :aok perk all GVs that are used on an LST
I am in need of a new epic quote
Happy Jack's Go Buggy

Offline skorpion

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3798
Re: LST ( landing ship,tank
« Reply #40 on: January 04, 2011, 07:59:02 PM »
scratch this idea... one word "perks" :aok perk all GVs that are used on an LST
:rofl oh hell no!

Offline 321BAR

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6140
Re: LST ( landing ship,tank
« Reply #41 on: January 04, 2011, 08:03:30 PM »
:rofl oh hell no!
and why is this bad?? most GVers have more than 1000 perks. and it is very easy to get perks so why wouldnt this be a good idea? :headscratch:
I am in need of a new epic quote
Happy Jack's Go Buggy

Offline skorpion

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3798
Re: LST ( landing ship,tank
« Reply #42 on: January 04, 2011, 08:06:00 PM »
and why is this bad?? most GVers have more than 1000 perks. and it is very easy to get perks so why wouldnt this be a good idea? :headscratch:
seriously? perking a perked gv on an LST would be pointless! (M4's aint free ya know) btw with my 8 months of being on AH i was hardly able to get 300 perks, and that was in the fighter sorties

Offline W7LPNRICK

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2050
      • Ham Radio Antenna Experiments
Re: LST ( landing ship,tank
« Reply #43 on: January 04, 2011, 10:44:38 PM »
I would bet a lot of the negative forum trolls
here voted for the B-29- guffaw! we need a new emoticon for guffaw! B-29 what a waste of resources. This is an interesting Idea and all some of you can do it criticize.   :huh
WildWzl
Ft Bragg Jump School-USAF Kunsan AB, Korea- Clark AB P.I.- Korat, Thailand-Tinker AFB Ok.- Mtn Home AFB Idaho
F-86's, F-4D, F-4G, F-5E Tiger II, C-130, UH-1N (Twin Engine Hueys) O-2's. E3A awacs, F-111, FB-111, EF-111,

Offline 321BAR

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6140
Re: LST ( landing ship,tank
« Reply #44 on: January 04, 2011, 10:44:59 PM »
seriously? perking a perked gv on an LST would be pointless! (M4's aint free ya know) btw with my 8 months of being on AH i was hardly able to get 300 perks, and that was in the fighter sorties
so a 5 perk GV on an LST isnt 300... most of us will be able to use an LST. and they wont be using the LST freely while theres a huge cap over the base/enemies nearby
I am in need of a new epic quote
Happy Jack's Go Buggy