« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Down

Author Topic: P-59  (Read 1041 times)

Offline Rino

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8495
Re: P-59
« Reply #15 on: April 16, 2011, 09:38:46 PM »
     Why not American?  Other than your obvious bias I mean.  Since alot of folks don't know about the unwritten
rules of acceptance they choose what they find.  

     The combat record of the 162 is limited at best, plus we need to make sure all the jets are German?
The meteor is definitely a more acceptable choice by the squadron strength and saw combat criteria.

     Wildcat, it must be a real burden to be so much smarter than everyone else.  I feel for you.
« Last Edit: April 16, 2011, 09:44:39 PM by Rino »
Logged
80th FS Headhunters
PHAN
Proud veteran of the Cola Wars

Offline Meatwad

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 12846
Re: P-59
« Reply #16 on: April 16, 2011, 09:53:02 PM »
OMFG GUYS LOOK WHAT I FOUNDZ!!! ITZ SOOO COOL WE SHUD ADD IT!!  M-5 STUART
Logged
See Rule 19- Do not place sausage on pizza.
I am No-Sausage-On-Pizza-Wad.
Das Funkillah - I kill hangers, therefore I am a funkiller. Coming to a vulchfest near you.
You cant tie a loop around 400000 lbs of locomotive using a 2 foot rope - Drediock on fat women

Offline Wildcat1

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2163
Re: P-59
« Reply #17 on: April 16, 2011, 10:25:42 PM »
Quote from: Rino on April 16, 2011, 09:38:46 PM
     Wildcat, it must be a real burden to be so much smarter than everyone else.  I feel for you.
:D

in all seriousness, i would have no problem with an American jet in the game, but only after a LOOOOONGG list of re-models and much needed EW and MW aircraft are added
Logged
having fun and getting killed since tour 110
The King of 'Cobras. 350th FG, Tunisia 2016

Air Traffic Controller (Air Warfare/Surface Warfare) 2nd Class, USS John C. Stennis CVN-74

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23047
Re: P-59
« Reply #18 on: April 16, 2011, 10:53:26 PM »
Quote from: Rino on April 16, 2011, 09:38:46 PM
    Why not American?  Other than your obvious bias I mean.
What bias I am showing?  I am not the one asking for something that didn't see combat just because it is American.

Personally, I don't think we need more jets of any kind, but given than people want them, it seems they could at least ask for the ones that fought in WWII.
Logged
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline DemonFox

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 158
Re: P-59
« Reply #19 on: April 17, 2011, 08:46:37 PM »
Karnak just liked to go shoot down peoples ideas. But in truth I have to agree that if it didn't see combat it shouldn't be put in aces high. I say put in the PBY :3 it saw lots of service
Logged

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23047
Re: P-59
« Reply #20 on: April 17, 2011, 08:56:19 PM »
Quote from: DemonFox on April 17, 2011, 08:46:37 PM
Karnak just liked to go shoot down peoples ideas. But in truth I have to agree that if it didn't see combat it shouldn't be put in aces high. I say put in the PBY :3 it saw lots of service
Bah.  Humbug.  I've supported every idea that I thought was good.  :p

PBY did indeed see lots of service.
Logged
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline B-17

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2672
Re: P-59
« Reply #21 on: April 23, 2011, 06:51:06 PM »
Quote from: DemonFox on April 17, 2011, 08:46:37 PM
Karnak just liked to go shoot down peoples ideas. But in truth I have to agree that if it didn't see combat it shouldn't be put in aces high. I say put in the PBY :3 it saw lots of service

i like the use of "shoot down"... in a flight combat sim.... :bolt:

PBY saw alot of service, yes, but including that owuld have to include adding more of a nval realism to the game. and what about other planes/GVs... and the updating of the ones we have... and anyways, my thoughts on what HTC should/could do is keep the combat areas the way they are (surface naval, airborne, and ground) and get those REALLY FANTASTIC (not that they arent already... just saying) and then introduce a new kind of combat (naval-- surface and below surface)
Logged

Offline Yeager

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10167
Re: P-59
« Reply #22 on: April 23, 2011, 07:50:32 PM »
Quote from: Karnak on April 16, 2011, 06:57:59 PM
but I don't get why they are obsessed with it being an American jet.  

What is so special about it being American?
You Sir apparently have never heard of Grand Funk Railroad.  Find here, in the haze of smoke, the answer to your question:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lMsIrKjSM6Y
Logged
"If someone flips you the bird and you don't know it, does it still count?" - SLIMpkns

Offline dirt911

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 435
Re: P-59
« Reply #23 on: April 23, 2011, 08:41:36 PM »
Quote from: Meatwad on April 16, 2011, 09:53:02 PM
OMFG GUYS LOOK WHAT I FOUNDZ!!! ITZ SOOO COOL WE SHUD ADD IT!!  M-5 STUART

+1
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Up
« previous next »