I can't say, we'd be blacklisted from future visits to the R.A.F. museum. You should of seen what he did to the Mosquito
Was he doing a little wing walking?
+1,000,000!! Before you knock it compared to what we already have, remember the Whirlwind was essentially a 1930s design and an attempt to answer the demand for heavier fighter armament. A Teddy Petter design it typically had some notable features for its day. One of the first fighter aircraft with a bubble canopy (with rear-view mirror incorporated), less frontal area than a Hurricane, excellent handling characteristics and large Fowler flaps (for which the rear section of the nacelles also tipped downwards, see photo). What the pictures don't illustrate is the diminutive size, it was only slightly larger than some of the single-engine fighters of the day. Quickly nickname the Crikey for its (comparatively) high speed!Powered by a development of an even earlier Rolls Royce V12, it was originally thought that the compact (but troublesome) Peregrine engine would eventually become the standard fighter engine for the forthcoming war until the Merlin replaced it. Shows how quickly was the pace of development in those times. Spitfires and Hurricanes mounting cannon and Rolls Royce discontinuing manufacture of the Peregrine marked the end of this promising design. (Image removed from quote.)(Image removed from quote.)(Image removed from quote.)(Image removed from quote.)(Image removed from quote.)(Image removed from quote.)
Do not run.Face your opponent with all you have.If you die you have something to learn.
My eyes But still... +1
Think this would be perked in Early war?~S~ Buck
Bring on the twins!We just got the Tu-2 and "recently" the 410. Now the stage is set to get the Whirlwind and Beaufighter!... and mossies, MOAR mossies! F.II, FB.XVIII, F.XXX, B.V...
I'd +1 this after an Italian and Soviet bomber. Early war perkie bird? Maybe.(Image removed from quote.)(Image removed from quote.)
You started this thread and it was obviously about your want and desire in spite of your use of 'we' and Google.